• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广泛而结构化的方法提高患者安全和质量:丹佛健康的经验教训。

A broad and structured approach to improving patient safety and quality: lessons from Denver Health.

机构信息

Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):612-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0042.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0042
PMID:21471480
Abstract

America's health care systems have not achieved the desired level of quality and safety. This may be due, in part, to the lack of clear and robust approaches for institutions to follow. Denver Health, an integrated, public safety-net institution, developed a multifaceted, structured approach to quality and safety improvement that has produced positive outcomes. For example, in 2010 Denver Health ranked first of 112 US academic medical centers in terms of actual mortality observed relative to the national mortality rate. Given these results, we argue that regulatory bodies should refocus their oversight to consider an institution's overall structured approach to quality improvement and safety, instead of monitoring individual small outcomes, such as a patient's receipt of antibiotics for pneumonia within six hours of arriving in the emergency department.

摘要

美国的医疗体系并未达到理想的质量和安全水平。部分原因可能是医疗机构缺乏明确且强有力的方法可循。丹佛健康医疗中心是一家综合性的公共医保定点医疗机构,它制定了一个多方面的、结构化的质量和安全改进方法,取得了积极的成果。例如,2010 年,丹佛健康医疗中心在全美 112 家学术医疗中心中,实际死亡率与全国死亡率相比排名第一。鉴于这些结果,我们认为监管机构应该重新调整其监督工作,以考虑机构在质量改进和安全方面的整体结构化方法,而不是监测个别小的结果,例如患者在抵达急诊部门后六小时内是否接受了肺炎抗生素治疗。

相似文献

1
A broad and structured approach to improving patient safety and quality: lessons from Denver Health.广泛而结构化的方法提高患者安全和质量:丹佛健康的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):612-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0042.
2
The quest for quality: perspectives from the safety net.对质量的追求:安全网的视角
Front Health Serv Manage. 2007 Summer;23(4):15-28.
3
Restructuring within an academic health center to support quality and safety: the development of the Center for Quality and Safety at the Massachusetts General Hospital.学术健康中心内部为支持质量与安全而进行的重组:麻省总医院质量与安全中心的发展
Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1663-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bfd09b.
4
Creating the patient safety mindset.树立患者安全意识。
Trustee. 2001 Oct;54(9):18-23, 1.
5
Safety and quality: our common goals.安全与质量:我们的共同目标。
Minn Med. 2004 Apr;87(4):16.
6
Hospitals educate patients to reduce medical errors, improve patient safety.医院对患者进行教育,以减少医疗差错,提高患者安全。
Perform Improv Advis. 2006 Jan;10(1):9-11, 1.
7
Implementing a national strategy for patient safety: lessons from the National Health Service in England.实施国家患者安全战略:来自英国国民医疗服务体系的经验教训。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):135-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011882.
8
Lessons learned from measuring safety culture: an Australian case study.从安全文化测量中吸取的教训:澳大利亚案例研究。
Midwifery. 2010 Oct;26(5):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
9
Embracing Leapfrog. As first hospital systems to join group, HCA, Promina hope to influence policy on patient-safety standards.拥抱“跳蛙”行动。作为首批加入该组织的医院系统,HCA和普罗米纳希望影响患者安全标准方面的政策。
Mod Healthc. 2002 Jul 1;32(26):6-7, 16, 1.
10
Improving clinical communication through structured conversation.通过结构化对话改善临床沟通。
Nurs Econ. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):268-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging stakeholders in the adaptation of the pediatric weight management program for national implementation.让利益相关者参与儿科体重管理项目的调整,以便在全国实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jun 17;1:55. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00047-z. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of hospital safety-net status on failure to rescue after major cardiac surgery.医院安全网状态对大型心脏手术后抢救失败的影响。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):778-784. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
3
Prediction of Future Chronic Opioid Use Among Hospitalized Patients.
预测住院患者未来慢性阿片类药物使用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):898-905. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4335-8. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Integration of data from a safety net health care system into the Vaccine Safety Datalink.将安全网医疗保健系统的数据整合到疫苗安全数据链中。
Vaccine. 2017 Mar 1;35(9):1329-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
A structured approach to improving patient safety: Lessons from a public safety-net system.一种改善患者安全的结构化方法:来自公共安全网系统的经验教训。
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 Dec 1;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-32.