• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术健康中心内部为支持质量与安全而进行的重组:麻省总医院质量与安全中心的发展

Restructuring within an academic health center to support quality and safety: the development of the Center for Quality and Safety at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

作者信息

Bohmer Richard M J, Bloom Jonathan D, Mort Elizabeth A, Demehin Akinluwa A, Meyer Gregg S

机构信息

Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1663-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bfd09b.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bfd09b
PMID:19940570
Abstract

Recent focus on the need to improve the quality and safety of health care has created new challenges for academic health centers (AHCs). Whereas previously quality was largely assumed, today it is increasingly quantifiable and requires organized systems for improvement. Traditional structures and cultures within AHCs, although well suited to the tripartite missions of teaching, research, and clinical care, are not easily adaptable to the tasks of measuring, reporting, and improving quality. Here, the authors use a case study of Massachusetts General Hospital's efforts to restructure quality and safety to illustrate the value of beginning with a focus on organizational culture, using a systematic process of engaging clinical leadership, developing an organizational framework dependent on proven business principles, leveraging focus events, and maintaining executive dedication to execution of the initiative. The case provides a generalizable example for AHCs of how applying explicit management design can foster robust organizational change with relatively modest incremental financial resources.

摘要

近期对提高医疗质量与安全的关注给学术医疗中心(AHCs)带来了新挑战。以往质量在很大程度上被视为理所当然,如今它越来越可量化,且需要有组织的改进系统。AHCs内部的传统结构和文化,尽管非常适合教学、研究和临床护理这三方使命,但并不容易适应衡量、报告和提高质量的任务。在此,作者通过对麻省总医院重组质量与安全工作的案例研究,来说明从关注组织文化入手的价值,采用让临床领导力参与的系统流程,建立依赖经过验证的商业原则的组织框架,利用重点事件,并保持高管对该举措执行的投入。该案例为AHCs提供了一个可推广的范例,展示了如何运用明确的管理设计,以相对适度的增量财政资源推动强大的组织变革。

相似文献

1
Restructuring within an academic health center to support quality and safety: the development of the Center for Quality and Safety at the Massachusetts General Hospital.学术健康中心内部为支持质量与安全而进行的重组:麻省总医院质量与安全中心的发展
Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1663-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bfd09b.
2
Observation and measurement of hand hygiene and patient identification improve compliance with patient safety practices.对手部卫生和患者身份识别进行观察与测量可提高对患者安全措施的依从性。
Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1705-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bf6988.
3
Physician quality officer: a new model for engaging physicians in quality improvement.医师质量官:让医师参与质量改进的新模式。
Am J Med Qual. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):295-301. doi: 10.1177/1062860609336219. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
4
Implementing a national strategy for patient safety: lessons from the National Health Service in England.实施国家患者安全战略:来自英国国民医疗服务体系的经验教训。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):135-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011882.
5
Perspective: call to action: it is time for academic institutions to appoint a resident quality and patient safety officer.观点:行动呼吁:现在是学术机构任命常驻质量和患者安全官员的时候了。
Acad Med. 2011 Jul;86(7):826-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821da286.
6
Organizational factors associated with high performance in quality and safety in academic medical centers.学术医疗中心中与质量和安全方面的高绩效相关的组织因素。
Acad Med. 2007 Dec;82(12):1178-86. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318159e1ff.
7
Patient first: a tri-fold approach to health care transformation.患者至上:医疗保健转型的三重方法。
Semin Nurse Manag. 2002 Jun;10(2):105-9.
8
A physician leadership development program at an academic medical center.一所学术医疗中心的医师领导力发展项目。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;19(3):231-8. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181eb13ab.
9
A broad and structured approach to improving patient safety and quality: lessons from Denver Health.广泛而结构化的方法提高患者安全和质量:丹佛健康的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):612-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0042.
10
Strong leadership and teamwork drive culture and performance change: Ohio State University Medical Center 2000-2006.强有力的领导与团队合作推动文化与绩效变革:俄亥俄州立大学医学中心2000 - 2006年
Acad Med. 2008 Sep;83(9):845-54. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d2e7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing HRO Principles under Stress: A Hospital's Journey toward High Reliability.在压力下践行高可靠性组织原则:一家医院迈向高可靠性的历程。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2025 May 22;10(3):e816. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000816. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.确定一线 NHS 员工提供质量改进所需的技能:来自六个案例研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
Designing a knowledge translation mentorship program to support the implementation of evidence-based innovations.
设计一个知识转化指导计划,以支持基于证据的创新的实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 14;15:198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0863-7.
4
Guidance for structuring team-based incentives in healthcare.医疗机构团队激励机制构建指南
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Feb 1;19(2):e64-70.
5
More quality measures versus measuring what matters: a call for balance and parsimony.更多的质量措施与衡量重要事项:呼吁平衡和简约。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):964-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001081. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
6
Commentary: clinical faculty, academic culture, and the future of medical professionalism.评论:临床教员、学术文化与医学职业精神的未来
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep;2(3):488-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00130.1.