Clausen Loa, Rosenvinge Jan H, Friborg Oddgeir, Rokkedal Kristian
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2011 Mar;33(1):101-110. doi: 10.1007/s10862-010-9207-4. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
The Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) is used worldwide in research and clinical work. The 3(rd) version (EDI-3) has been used in recent research, yet without any independent testing of its psychometric properties. The aim of the present study was twofold: 1) to establish national norms and to compare them with the US and international norms, and 2) to examine the factor structure, the internal consistency, the sensitivity and the specificity of subscale scores. Participants were Danish adult female patients (N = 561) from a specialist treatment centre and a control group (N = 878) was women selected from the Danish Civil Registration system. Small but significant differences were found between Danish and international, as well as US norms. Overall, the factor structure was confirmed, the internal consistency of the subscales was satisfactory, the discriminative validity was good, and sensitivity and specificity were excellent. The implications from these results are discussed.
饮食失调问卷（EDI）在全球范围内用于研究和临床工作。第三版（EDI - 3）已在近期研究中使用，但尚未对其心理测量特性进行任何独立测试。本研究的目的有两个：1）建立全国常模并与美国和国际常模进行比较，2）检验分量表得分的因子结构、内部一致性、敏感性和特异性。参与者为来自专科治疗中心的丹麦成年女性患者（N = 561），对照组（N = 878）为从丹麦民事登记系统中选取的女性。丹麦常模与国际常模以及美国常模之间存在虽小但显著的差异。总体而言，因子结构得到确认，分量表的内部一致性令人满意，区分效度良好，敏感性和特异性极佳。文中讨论了这些结果的意义。
