Southwestern University, Georgetown, TX 78626, USA.
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar-Apr;151(2):180-200. doi: 10.1080/00224540903510837.
The present study tested the prediction that male teachers are judged more harshly than female teachers for engaging in heterosexual intercourse with a student. One-hundred and eighty-seven adults (116 women, 71 men) evaluated a hypothetical newspaper article describing an alleged student-teacher relationship as part of a 2 (Gender Dyad: Male Teacher/Female Student or Female Teacher/Male Student) x 2 (Initiator: Student or Teacher) between-subjects design. As expected, a reverse sexual double standard was revealed, in which participants judged situations involving male teachers more harshly than they judged situations involving female teachers, but only when the sexual contact was teacher-initiated. Participants also believed that male students received more social benefits from the sexual contact than did female students.
本研究检验了这样一种假设,即与学生发生异性性关系的男教师会比女教师受到更严厉的评判。187 名成年人(116 名女性,71 名男性)参与了一项研究,他们对一篇描述涉嫌师生关系的假设性报纸文章进行了评价,这是一项 2(性别对:男教师/女学生或女教师/男学生)x 2(发起者:学生或教师)的被试间设计的一部分。正如预期的那样,出现了一种相反的性双重标准,即参与者对涉及男教师的情况的评判比涉及女教师的情况更为严厉,但这种情况仅出现在性接触由教师发起的情况下。参与者还认为,与女学生相比,男学生从性接触中获得了更多的社会利益。