Wesche Rose, Espinosa-Hernández Graciela, Lefkowitz Eva S
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA.
University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Sex Cult. 2016 Dec;20(4):1003-1019. doi: 10.1007/s12119-016-9370-1. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
The sexual double standard influences men's and women's sexual attitudes and behavior, leading men and women to consider distinct sexual motives, or reasons whether or not to engage in sexual intercourse (Crawford & Popp 2003; Reiss 1964). The goal of the present paper was to document how the sexual double standard shapes perceptions of peers' sexual motives. We build on past research by using open-ended questions and measuring perceptions of both same-gender and other-gender peers. The sample included 154 heterosexual college students (50% female, 49% European American, 25% Latino American, 26% African American) recruited via probability sampling. When we compared perceptions of men's and women's sexual motives, we found that participants seemed to rely on the sexual double standard. Participants were more likely to attribute a female-stereotyped motive (e.g., romantic relationship characteristics, feeling "ready", emotional investment) and less likely to attribute a male-stereotyped motive ("easy", arousal, physical appearance) to female peers than to male peers. However, when we compared participants' own motives to perceptions of their peers' motives, participants overestimated male-stereotyped motives and underestimated female-stereotyped motives in peers, regardless of peer gender, possibly in congruence with stereotypes of hookup culture. These findings demonstrate that, although individuals sometimes rely on the sexual double standard to attribute sexual motives to others, misperceptions of peers' sexual motives may also be influenced by stereotypes of hookup culture. These misperceptions contribute to pluralistic ignorance that may influence college students' sexual behaviors.
性双重标准影响着男性和女性的性态度及行为,导致男性和女性会考虑不同的性动机,即是否进行性行为的原因(克劳福德和波普,2003年;赖斯,1964年)。本文的目的是记录性双重标准如何塑造对同龄人中性动机的认知。我们借鉴以往的研究,采用开放式问题并测量对同性和异性同龄人的认知。样本包括通过概率抽样招募的154名异性恋大学生(50%为女性,49%为欧裔美国人,25%为拉丁裔美国人,26%为非裔美国人)。当我们比较对男性和女性性动机的认知时,发现参与者似乎依赖于性双重标准。与男性同龄人相比,参与者更倾向于将女性刻板印象的动机(例如浪漫关系特征、感觉“准备好了”、情感投入)归因于女性同龄人,而不太可能将男性刻板印象的动机(“随便”、性唤起、外貌)归因于女性同龄人。然而,当我们将参与者自己的动机与对同龄人的动机认知进行比较时,无论同龄人的性别如何,参与者都高估了同龄人中男性刻板印象的动机,而低估了女性刻板印象的动机,这可能与勾搭文化的刻板印象一致。这些发现表明,尽管个体有时会依赖性双重标准来将性动机归因于他人,但对同龄人中性动机的误解也可能受到勾搭文化刻板印象的影响。这些误解导致了多元无知,可能会影响大学生的性行为。