Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 May;24(2):163-190. doi: 10.1177/1088868319891310. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
(Hetero)sexual double standards (SDS) entail that different sexual behaviors are appropriate for men and women. This meta-analysis ( = 99; = 123,343) tested predictions of evolutionary and biosocial theories regarding the existence of SDS in social cognitions. Databases were searched for studies examining attitudes or stereotypes regarding the sexual behaviors of men versus women. Studies assessing differences in evaluations, or expectations, of men's and women's sexual behavior yielded evidence for traditional SDS ( = 0.25). For men, frequent sexual activity was more expected, and evaluated more positively, than for women. Studies using Likert-type-scale questionnaires did not yield evidence of SDS (combined = -0.09). Effects were moderated by level of gender equality in the country in which the study was conducted, SDS-operationalization (attitudes vs. stereotypes), questionnaire type, and sexual behavior type. Results are consistent with a hybrid model incorporating both evolutionary and sociocultural factors contributing to SDS.
异性恋双重标准(SDS)意味着不同的性行为适合男性和女性。本元分析(n=99;N=123343)检验了进化和生物社会理论关于 SDS 在社会认知中存在的预测。数据库中搜索了研究男性与女性性行为态度或刻板印象的研究。评估男性和女性性行为差异的研究产生了传统 SDS 的证据(r=0.25)。对于男性,人们期望他们有更频繁的性行为,对他们的性行为评价也更积极。使用李克特量表问卷的研究没有发现 SDS 的证据(综合 r=-0.09)。研究结果受到研究所在国家性别平等水平、SDS 的操作化(态度与刻板印象)、问卷类型和性行为类型的调节。结果与一个混合模型一致,该模型结合了进化和社会文化因素,这些因素促成了 SDS。