Winterbauer Neil E, Bouton Mark E
University of Vermont.
Learn Motiv. 2011 May 1;42(2):154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.01.002.
Three experiments with rat subjects examined resurgence of an extinguished instrumental response using the procedure introduced by Epstein (1983) with pigeons. There were three phases: (1) initial acquisition of pressing on a lever (L1) for pellet reward, (2) extinction of L1, and (3) a test session in which a second lever (L2) was inserted, briefly reinforced, and then extinguished. Experiment 1 confirmed that if pressing L2 delivered 20 pellets followed by extinction, rats would resume L1 responding in the final test. Experiment 2 compared the effects of response-contingent and non-contingent rewards delivered upon insertion of L2. Although insertion of L2 alone did not increase L1 responding, response-contingent and non-contingent rewards led to comparable increases in L1 responding. Experiment 3 found that the delivery of non-contingent pellets during extinction of L1, which would be expected to reduce the ability of pellets to set the occasion for the L1 response, also reduced the effects of both response-contingent and non-contingent rewards during the final test. The results indicate that in this method, the resurgence treatment leads to an increase in L1 pressing due to simple presentation of the pellet; delivering the reinforcer after extinction of L1 reinstates L1 responding by setting the occasion for the L1 response.
三项以大鼠为实验对象的实验,采用了爱泼斯坦(1983年)针对鸽子所采用的程序,来检验消退后的工具性反应的恢复情况。实验分为三个阶段:(1)最初通过按压杠杆1(L1)获取食丸奖励,(2)L1反应消退,(3)测试阶段,在此阶段插入第二个杠杆(L2),短暂给予强化,然后消退。实验1证实,如果按压L2能获得20颗食丸然后消退,大鼠在最终测试中会恢复L1反应。实验2比较了插入L2时给予的反应依存性奖励和非依存性奖励的效果。虽然单独插入L2并没有增加L1反应,但反应依存性奖励和非依存性奖励都导致L1反应有类似程度的增加。实验3发现,在L1消退期间给予非依存性食丸,这预计会降低食丸为L1反应设定情境的能力,同时也降低了最终测试中反应依存性奖励和非依存性奖励的效果。结果表明,在这种方法中,恢复处理由于简单呈现食丸而导致L1按压增加;在L1消退后给予强化物,通过为L1反应设定情境来恢复L1反应。