Suppr超能文献

治疗后结直肠癌患者表达性披露小组干预的可行性:健康表达研究的结果。

Feasibility of an expressive-disclosure group intervention for post-treatment colorectal cancer patients: results of the Healthy Expressions study.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77230-1439, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;117(21):4993-5002. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26110. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjusting to cancer requires effective cognitive and emotional processing. Written and verbal disclosure facilitate processing and have been studied independently in cancer survivors. Combined written and verbal expression may be more effective than either alone, particularly for patients with difficult to discuss or embarrassing side effects. Thus, the authors developed and tested the efficacy of a 12-session combined written and verbal expression group program for psychologically distressed colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

Forty post-treatment patients with CRC (stages I-III) identified as psychologically distressed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) were randomized to an intervention group (Healthy Expressions; n = 25) or standard care (control group; n = 15). Assessments were completed at baseline, Month 2, and Month 4 (postintervention). Primary outcomes were psychological functioning and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

Most participants were women (63%), white (63%), and non-Hispanic (75%). The Healthy Expressions group demonstrated significantly greater changes in distress compared with the control group at Month 2 on the BSI Global Severity Index (GSI) and the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) scores (P < .05 for each); differences in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) global QOL scores approached significance (P = .063). The BSI GSI and Positive Symptom Total, CES-D, and EORTC emotional functioning subscale scores were all significant at Month 4 (P < .05 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

The Healthy Expressions program improved psychological functioning in CRC patients who reported experiencing distress. Findings demonstrate the program's feasibility and provide strong support for conducting a larger randomized trial.

摘要

背景

适应癌症需要有效的认知和情绪处理。书面和口头披露有助于处理,并且已经在癌症幸存者中进行了独立研究。书面和口头表达的结合可能比单独使用任何一种都更有效,尤其是对于那些难以讨论或尴尬的副作用的患者。因此,作者开发并测试了一种 12 节的书面和口头表达相结合的团体方案,用于治疗心理困扰的结直肠癌(CRC)患者。

方法

40 名接受治疗的 CRC(I-III 期)患者使用Brief Symptom Inventory(BSI)被确定为心理困扰,他们被随机分配到干预组(Healthy Expressions;n = 25)或标准护理(对照组;n = 15)。评估在基线、第 2 个月和第 4 个月(干预后)进行。主要结果是心理功能和生活质量(QOL)。

结果

大多数参与者是女性(63%)、白人(63%)和非西班牙裔(75%)。与对照组相比,Healthy Expressions 组在第 2 个月时在 BSI 总体严重程度指数(GSI)和中心流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D)评分上的困扰变化显著更大(每个 P <.05);欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)全球 QOL 评分的差异接近显著(P =.063)。在第 4 个月时,BSI GSI 和阳性症状总分、CES-D 和 EORTC 情绪功能子量表的评分均显著(每个 P <.05)。

结论

Healthy Expressions 方案改善了报告有困扰的 CRC 患者的心理功能。研究结果表明了该方案的可行性,并为进行更大规模的随机试验提供了强有力的支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验