• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试工作场所体力活动干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验。

Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Apr 11;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-29.

DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-8-29
PMID:21481265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3094266/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased physical activity levels benefit both an individuals' health and productivity at work. The purpose of the current study was to explore the impact and cost-effectiveness of a workplace physical activity intervention designed to increase physical activity levels.

METHODS

A total of 1260 participants from 44 UK worksites (based within 5 organizations) were recruited to a cluster randomized controlled trial with worksites randomly allocated to an intervention or control condition. Measurement of physical activity and other variables occurred at baseline, and at 0 months, 3 months and 9 months post-intervention. Health outcomes were measured during a 30 minute health check conducted in worksites at baseline and 9 months post intervention. The intervention consisted of a 3 month tool-kit of activities targeting components of the Theory of Planned Behavior, delivered in-house by nominated facilitators. Self-reported physical activity (measured using the IPAQ short-form) and health outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Multilevel modelling found no significant effect of the intervention on MET minutes of activity (from the IPAQ) at any of the follow-up time points controlling for baseline activity. However, the intervention did significantly reduce systolic blood pressure (B=-1.79 mm/Hg) and resting heart rate (B=-2.08 beats) and significantly increased body mass index (B=.18 units) compared to control. The intervention was found not to be cost-effective, however the substantial variability round this estimate suggested that further research is warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found mixed support for this worksite physical activity intervention. The paper discusses some of the tensions involved in conducting rigorous evaluations of large-scale randomized controlled trials in real-world settings.

摘要

背景

增加身体活动水平有益于个人的健康和工作生产力。本研究的目的是探讨旨在提高身体活动水平的工作场所身体活动干预措施的影响和成本效益。

方法

共有 1260 名参与者来自 44 个英国工作场所(基于 5 个组织内)被招募到一项群组随机对照试验中,工作场所被随机分配到干预组或对照组。在基线、0 个月、3 个月和 9 个月的干预后,测量身体活动和其他变量。在基线和干预后 9 个月在工作场所进行的 30 分钟健康检查中测量健康结果。干预措施包括一个针对计划行为理论组成部分的 3 个月工具包活动,由指定的促进者在内部提供。使用 IPAQ 短表自我报告身体活动(测量)和健康结果。

结果与讨论

多层次建模发现,在控制基线活动的情况下,干预对 IPAQ 中活动的代谢当量分钟数在任何随访时间点都没有显著影响。然而,与对照组相比,干预确实显著降低了收缩压(B=-1.79 毫米汞柱)和静息心率(B=-2.08 次),并显著增加了体重指数(B=.18 单位)。干预措施被发现没有成本效益,但是围绕这个估计值的很大的可变性表明需要进一步研究。

结论

本研究对这种工作场所身体活动干预措施提供了混合支持。本文讨论了在真实环境中进行大规模随机对照试验的严格评估中涉及的一些紧张局势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d16e/3094266/b45f599db813/1479-5868-8-29-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d16e/3094266/b45f599db813/1479-5868-8-29-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d16e/3094266/b45f599db813/1479-5868-8-29-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.测试工作场所体力活动干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Apr 11;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-29.
2
Effects of a Multi-Component Workplace Intervention Program with Environmental Changes on Physical Activity among Japanese White-Collar Employees: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.一项包含环境改变的多成分职场干预项目对日本白领员工身体活动的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):637-648. doi: 10.1007/s12529-018-9747-7.
3
Intervention fidelity and effectiveness of a UK worksite physical activity intervention funded by the BUPA Foundation, UK.由英国保柏基金会资助的一项英国工作场所身体活动干预措施的干预保真度和效果。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Mar;30(1):38-49. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau088. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.用于增加身体活动量的工作场所计步器干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD009209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009209.pub2.
5
Effects of a multicomponent workplace intervention programme with environmental changes on physical activity among Japanese white collar employees: a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项包含环境改变的多成分工作场所干预计划对日本白领员工身体活动的影响:一项整群随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e017688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017688.
6
Cost and cost-effectiveness of the 'Stand and Move at Work' multicomponent intervention to reduce workplace sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk.“站立和运动工作”多组分干预措施降低工作场所久坐时间和心血管代谢风险的成本和成本效益。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Jul 1;48(5):399-409. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4022. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
7
Associations among workplace environment, self-regulation, and domain-specific physical activities among white-collar workers: a multilevel longitudinal study.白领人群工作环境、自我调节与特定领域体育活动之间的关系:一项多层次纵向研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 May 31;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0681-5.
8
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: A cluster randomised controlled trial.促进英国青少年增加身体活动的 GoActive 干预措施的有效性和成本效益:一项集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 23;17(7):e1003210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003210. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
A blended intervention to promote physical activity, health and work productivity among office employees using intervention mapping: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项使用干预映射法促进办公室员工身体活动、健康和工作效率的混合干预措施:一项群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 25;20(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09128-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and productivity benefits of a multicomponent workplace program by gender in small companies.小型公司中按性别划分的多组分工作场所计划对健康和生产力的益处。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Aug 29;7:1672619. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1672619. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors for adherence to a physical activity promotion program in the workplace: a systematic review.职场中坚持体育活动促进计划的因素:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 17;25(1):1827. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22775-4.
3
Unleashing the potential of Health Promotion in primary care-a scoping literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences.《促进健康的身体活动基础:英国运动与运动科学协会共识声明》。
J Sports Sci. 2010 Apr;28(6):573-91. doi: 10.1080/02640411003671212.
2
Physical activity on prescription (PAP): costs and consequences of a randomized, controlled trial in primary healthcare.处方运动疗法(PAP):初级医疗保健中一项随机对照试验的成本与结果
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(4):216-22. doi: 10.3109/02813430903438734.
3
Effectiveness of the First step Program delivered by professionals versus peers.
释放初级保健中健康促进的潜力——范围文献综述。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae044.
4
Impact of a Wellness Leadership Intervention on the Empathy, Burnout, and Resting Heart Rate of Medical Faculty.健康领导力干预对医学教师同理心、职业倦怠和静息心率的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Nov 23;7(6):545-555. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.005. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Physical Activity and Well-being Status among Employees of University of Medical Sciences.医科大学员工的体育活动与健康状况
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Aug 27;36:97. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.97. eCollection 2022.
6
Factors influencing implementation of health-promoting interventions at workplaces: Protocol for a scoping review.影响工作场所促进健康干预措施实施的因素:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0275887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275887. eCollection 2022.
7
Motives Driving Non-healthcare Community Organizations to Engage in Health Promotion Activities.推动非医疗保健社区组织参与健康促进活动的动机。
J Community Health. 2022 Oct;47(5):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01108-1. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
8
STAR-VITAL, a Four Year Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion Program: Study Design.STAR-VITAL,一个为期四年的综合工作场所健康促进计划:研究设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 11;19(10):5854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105854.
9
The UP150: A Multifactorial Environmental Intervention to Promote Employee Physical and Mental Well-Being.UP150:促进员工身心健康的多因素环境干预。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3):1175. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031175.
10
Adherence to a Lifestyle Exercise and Nutrition Intervention in University Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.新冠疫情期间大学员工对生活方式、运动及营养干预措施的依从性:一项随机对照试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 14;18(14):7510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147510.
由专业人员与同龄人实施的第一步计划的有效性。
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):456-62. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.4.456.
4
Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions.工作场所身体活动干预的荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.008.
5
Association between time spent in sedentary, moderate to vigorous physical activity, body mass index, cardiorespiratory fitness and blood pressure.久坐时间、中度至剧烈身体活动、体重指数、心肺适能与血压之间的关联。
Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Jul-Aug;36(4):379-87. doi: 10.1080/03014460902817976. Epub 2009 May 11.
6
Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis.基于学校的体育活动干预对儿童体重指数的影响:一项荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2009 Mar 31;180(7):719-26. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080966.
7
Resting heart rate as a low tech predictor of coronary events in women: prospective cohort study.静息心率作为女性冠状动脉事件的低技术预测指标:前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2009 Feb 3;338:b219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b219.
8
Can there be a single best measure of reported physical activity?对于所报告的身体活动,能否有一种单一的最佳衡量标准?
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Mar;89(3):736-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27461. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
9
Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire.六个欧洲国家人群健康状况比较:使用EQ-5D问卷进行的代表性调查结果
Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):255-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318184759e.
10
Referral from primary care to a physical activity programme: establishing long-term adherence? A randomized controlled trial. Rationale and study design.从初级保健转诊至体育活动计划:建立长期依从性?一项随机对照试验。原理与研究设计。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jan 22;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-31.