Suppr超能文献

德国宫颈癌初级人乳头瘤病毒筛查的成本效益分析——决策分析。

Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV screening for cervical cancer in Germany--a decision analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center I, A-6060 Hall iT, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(11):1633-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HPV-based primary cervical cancer screening in the German health care context using a decision-analysis approach.

METHODS

A Markov-model for HPV-infection and cervical cancer was developed for the German health care context, and applied to evaluate various screening strategies that differ by screening interval and test algorithms, including HPV-testing alone or in combination with cytology. German clinical, epidemiological, and economic data, and test accuracy data from international meta-analyses were used. Outcomes predicted included the reduction in cervical cancer cases and deaths, life expectancy and discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The analysis was performed from the perspective of the healthcare system adopting a 3% annual discount rate for costs and outcomes. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

HPV-based screening is more effective than cytology alone. It results in a 71-97% reduction in cervical cancer cases as compared to 53-93% for cytology alone. The ICER range from 2600 Euro/LYG (cytology, 5-year-interval) to 155,500 Euro/LYG (annual HPV-testing starting at age 30 years, cytology age 20-29 years). Annual cytology alone, the current recommended screening strategy in Germany, is dominated by HPV-strategies. Increasing the age at screening initiation from 20 to 25 years does not result in a relevant loss in effectiveness but results in lower costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our analyses, HPV-based cervical cancer screening is more effective than cytology alone and could be cost-effective if performed at intervals of two years or longer. In the German context, an optimal screening strategy may be biennial HPV screening starting at age 30 years preceded by biennial cytology for women aged 25-29 years. Longer screening intervals may be considered in low-risk women with good screening adherence and in populations with low HPV-incidence.

摘要

目的

采用决策分析方法系统评价 HPV 为基础的宫颈癌初级筛查在德国卫生保健环境下的长期效果和成本效益。

方法

为德国卫生保健环境建立了 HPV 感染和宫颈癌的 Markov 模型,并应用于评估各种筛查策略,这些策略在筛查间隔和测试算法上有所不同,包括单独使用 HPV 测试或与细胞学联合使用。使用了德国临床、流行病学和经济数据以及来自国际荟萃分析的测试准确性数据。预测的结果包括宫颈癌病例和死亡人数的减少、预期寿命和贴现增量成本效益比(ICER)。分析从采用 3%年度贴现率对成本和结果进行贴现的医疗保健系统的角度进行。进行了广泛的敏感性分析。

结果

HPV 为基础的筛查比单独使用细胞学更有效。与单独使用细胞学相比,HPV 筛查可使宫颈癌病例减少 71%-97%。ICER 的范围从每增加 1 年生命预期的 2600 欧元(细胞学,5 年间隔)到 155500 欧元(从 30 岁开始每年进行 HPV 检测,细胞学在 20-29 岁年龄进行)。目前在德国推荐的筛查策略是每年单独进行细胞学检查,这种策略被 HPV 策略所主导。将筛查起始年龄从 20 岁增加到 25 岁不会导致效果显著降低,但会降低成本。

结论

根据我们的分析,基于 HPV 的宫颈癌筛查比单独使用细胞学更有效,如果每两年或更长时间进行一次,可以具有成本效益。在德国,最佳的筛查策略可能是每两年进行一次 HPV 筛查,30 岁开始,对于 25-29 岁的女性每两年进行一次细胞学检查。在具有良好筛查依从性的低风险女性和 HPV 发病率较低的人群中,可以考虑更长的筛查间隔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验