Suppr超能文献

短期 S-氯胺酮输注治疗纤维肌痛疼痛无长期镇痛作用:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲、活性安慰剂对照试验。

Absence of long-term analgesic effect from a short-term S-ketamine infusion on fibromyalgia pain: a randomized, prospective, double blind, active placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2011 Oct;15(9):942-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

Abstract

To assess the analgesic efficacy of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist S(+)-ketamine on fibromyalgia pain, the authors performed a randomized double blind, active placebo-controlled trial. Twenty-four fibromyalgia patients were randomized to receive a 30-min intravenous infusion with S(+)-ketamine (total dose 0.5mg/kg, n=12) or the active placebo, midazolam (5mg, n=12). Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and ketamine plasma samples were obtained for 2.5-h following termination of treatment; pain scores derived from the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ) were collected weekly during an 8-week follow-up. Fifteen min after termination of infusion the number of patients showing a reduction in pain scores >50% was 8 vs. 3 (P<0.05), at t=180min 6 vs. 2 (ns), at the end of week-1 2 vs. 0 (ns) and at end of week-8 2 vs. 2 in the ketamine and midazolam groups, respectively. Ketamine effect on VAS closely followed ketamine plasma concentrations. For VAS and FIQ scores no significant differences in treatment effects were observed in the 2.5-h following infusion or during the 8-week follow-up. Side effects as measured by the Bowdle questionnaire (which scores for 13 separate psychedelic symptoms) were mild to moderate in both study groups and declined rapidly, indicating adequate blinding of treatments. Efficacy of ketamine was limited and restricted in duration to its pharmacokinetics. The authors argue that a short-term infusion of ketamine is insufficient to induce long-term analgesic effects in fibromyalgia patients.

摘要

为了评估 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂 S(+)-氯胺酮治疗纤维肌痛疼痛的疗效,作者进行了一项随机、双盲、阳性对照试验。24 名纤维肌痛患者被随机分为接受 30 分钟静脉输注 S(+)-氯胺酮(总剂量 0.5mg/kg,n=12)或阳性对照药物咪达唑仑(5mg,n=12)。治疗结束后 2.5 小时内采集视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和氯胺酮血样;在 8 周随访期间每周收集纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)的疼痛评分。输注结束后 15 分钟,疼痛评分降低>50%的患者人数为 8 例 vs. 3 例(P<0.05),t=180 分钟时为 6 例 vs. 2 例(ns),第 1 周结束时为 2 例 vs. 0 例(ns),第 8 周结束时为 2 例 vs. 2 例,分别为氯胺酮组和咪达唑仑组。氯胺酮对 VAS 的影响与氯胺酮血浆浓度密切相关。在输注后 2.5 小时内或 8 周随访期间,VAS 和 FIQ 评分均未观察到治疗效果的显著差异。通过 Bowdle 问卷(评分 13 种不同的致幻症状)测量的副作用在两组研究中均为轻度至中度,并迅速下降,表明治疗方法的盲法效果良好。氯胺酮的疗效有限,且其持续时间受药代动力学限制。作者认为,在纤维肌痛患者中,短期输注氯胺酮不足以诱导长期的镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验