Solberg L I, Peterson K E, Ellis R W, Romness K, Rohrenbach E, Thell T, Smith A, Routier A, Stillmank M W, Zak S
Blue Plus, St. Paul, MN 55164.
Inquiry. 1990 Winter;27(4):359-67.
With national HMO quality assurance requirements pending for Medicare risk contracts, three HMOs in Minnesota established a working group with the state Department of Health to develop and test a new methodology proposed for quality of care review. A two-tiered system was developed for ambulatory chart review based on 15 hospitalization diagnoses having a potential for inadequate prehospital care. This system was applied to 796 cases from the HMOs (2% of admissions). Technical problems limited actual review to 673 of these cases. Although 304 (45%) of reviewed cases failed initial screening, physician review found only 22% of such failures (10% of reviewed cases) to represent probable quality of care problems. The approach appears to be feasible and unusually efficient. Although there is considerable variability that limits its potential use for interhealth plan comparison, the approach holds promise for quality assurance within an individual health plan.
鉴于医疗保险风险合同的全国性健康维护组织(HMO)质量保证要求即将出台,明尼苏达州的三家HMO与州卫生部成立了一个工作组,以开发和测试一种提议用于医疗质量审查的新方法。基于15种可能存在院前护理不足的住院诊断,开发了一种用于门诊病历审查的两级系统。该系统应用于HMO的796例病例(占入院病例的2%)。技术问题导致实际审查的病例仅为其中的673例。尽管304例(45%)审查病例在初步筛查中未通过,但医生审查发现此类未通过病例中只有22%(占审查病例的10%)可能存在医疗质量问题。该方法似乎可行且效率极高。尽管存在相当大的变异性,限制了其在健康计划间比较中的潜在用途,但该方法在单个健康计划的质量保证方面具有前景。