Suppr超能文献

皮质醇排泄是否与月经周期天数无关?对首晨尿标本的纵向评估。

Is cortisol excretion independent of menstrual cycle day? A longitudinal evaluation of first morning urinary specimens.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e18242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018242.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cortisol is frequently used as a marker of physiologic stress levels. Using cortisol for that purpose, however, requires a thorough understanding of its normal longitudinal variability. The current understanding of longitudinal variability of basal cortisol secretion in women is very limited. It is often assumed, for example, that basal cortisol profiles do not vary across the menstrual cycle. This is a critical assumption: if cortisol were to follow a time dependent pattern during the menstrual cycle, then ignoring this cyclic variation could lead to erroneous imputation of physiologic stress. Yet, the assumption that basal cortisol levels are stable across the menstrual cycle rests on partial and contradictory evidence. Here we conduct a thorough test of that assumption using data collected for up to a year from 25 women living in rural Guatemala.

METHODOLOGY

We apply a linear mixed model to describe longitudinal first morning urinary cortisol profiles, accounting for differences in both mean and standard deviation of cortisol among women. To that aim we evaluate the fit of two alternative models. The first model assumes that cortisol does not vary with menstrual cycle day. The second assumes that cortisol mean varies across the menstrual cycle. Menstrual cycles are aligned on ovulation day (day 0). Follicular days are assigned negative numbers and luteal days positive numbers. When we compared Models 1 and 2 restricting our analysis to days between -14 (follicular) and day 14 (luteal) then day of the menstrual cycle did not emerge as a predictor of urinary cortisol levels (p-value>0.05). Yet, when we extended our analyses beyond that central 28-day-period then day of the menstrual cycle become a statistically significant predictor of cortisol levels.

SIGNIFICANCE

The observed trend suggests that studies including cycling women should account for day dependent variation in cortisol in cycles with long follicular and luteal phases.

摘要

背景

皮质醇常被用作生理应激水平的标志物。然而,要将皮质醇用于此目的,需要充分了解其正常的纵向变异性。目前对女性基础皮质醇分泌的纵向变异性的理解非常有限。例如,人们通常认为基础皮质醇谱在月经周期内不会发生变化。这是一个关键假设:如果皮质醇在月经周期内呈现时间依赖性模式,那么忽略这种周期性变化可能会导致对生理应激的错误推断。然而,基础皮质醇水平在整个月经周期内保持稳定的假设基于部分和相互矛盾的证据。在这里,我们使用在危地马拉农村生活的 25 名女性长达一年的数据进行了彻底的测试。

方法

我们应用线性混合模型来描述纵向的第一次晨尿皮质醇谱,同时考虑了女性之间皮质醇均值和标准差的差异。为此,我们评估了两种替代模型的拟合情况。第一个模型假设皮质醇不随月经周期天数而变化。第二个模型假设皮质醇均值在月经周期内发生变化。月经周期与排卵日(第 0 天)对齐。滤泡期天数赋值为负数,黄体期天数赋值为正数。当我们将模型 1 和模型 2 的分析限制在-14 天(滤泡期)到 14 天(黄体期)之间时,月经周期天数没有成为尿皮质醇水平的预测因子(p 值>0.05)。然而,当我们将分析扩展到该中心的 28 天周期之外时,月经周期天数成为皮质醇水平的统计学显著预测因子。

意义

观察到的趋势表明,包括周期女性的研究应该考虑到具有长滤泡期和黄体期的周期中皮质醇的日依赖性变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验