• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测在未参加宫颈癌筛查项目的阴道刷自采样中的应用经验。

Experience with high-risk human papillomavirus testing on vaginal brush-based self-samples of non-attendees of the cervical screening program.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;130(5):1128-35. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26128. Epub 2011 May 30.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.26128
PMID:21484793
Abstract

We evaluated the effect of offering brush-based vaginal self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing to non-attendees of the cervical screening program on response rate, compliance to follow-up and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN2+/CIN3+) yield. In addition, concordance of hrHPV test results between physician-taken cervical scrapes and vaginal self-samples was determined. A total of 26,409 nonattending women were randomly assigned to receive a vaginal brush device for hrHPV testing by Hybrid Capture-2 method (i.e., self-sampling group, n = 26,145) or a reinvitation for regular cytology-based screening (i.e., recall control group, n = 264). hrHPV-positive self-sampling responders were invited for a physician-taken scrape for cytology and blinded hrHPV testing. If cytology was abnormal, women were referred for colposcopy. Response rate in the self-sampling group was significantly increased compared to the recall control group (30.8% versus 6.5%; p < 0.001). The concordance rate between hrHPV detection in self-samples and corresponding physician-taken cervical scrape samples was 68.8%. Amongst women with CIN3+ and CIN2+, the concordance rates in hrHPV positivity between both samples were 95.5% and 93.8%, respectively. Adherence at baseline to cytology triage of hrHPV-positive self-sampling women (89.1%) and colposcopy referral of those with abnormal cytology (95.8%) was high. The CIN2+/CIN3+/carcinoma yields were 1.5%, 1.0% and 0.1%, respectively, in self-sampling responders. In conclusion, offering hrHPV testing on self-sampled vaginal material with a brush device to non-attendees significantly increases the attendance to the regular screening program, yields hrHPV test results that are in very good concordance with those of physician-taken scrapes in women with CIN2+/CIN3+, and is effective in detecting CIN2+/CIN3+.

摘要

我们评估了向未能参加宫颈癌筛查项目的高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)检测的女性提供巴氏刷阴道自采样对反应率、对随访的依从性以及 2 级或 3 级宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2+/CIN3+)检出率的影响。此外,还确定了医生取样的宫颈刮片与阴道自采样之间 hrHPV 检测结果的一致性。共有 26409 名未参加的女性被随机分配接受基于杂交捕获 2 法的 hrHPV 检测的巴氏刷设备(即自采样组,n=26145)或常规细胞学为基础的筛查的重新邀请(即召回对照组,n=264)。hrHPV 阳性的自采样应答者被邀请进行医生取样的刮片细胞学和盲法 hrHPV 检测。如果细胞学异常,女性将被转诊行阴道镜检查。与召回对照组相比,自采样组的反应率显著增加(30.8%比 6.5%;p<0.001)。自采样与相应的医生取样宫颈刮片样本中 hrHPV 检测的一致性率为 68.8%。在患有 CIN3+和 CIN2+的女性中,两种样本中 hrHPV 阳性的一致性率分别为 95.5%和 93.8%。hrHPV 阳性自采样女性的细胞学分流(89.1%)和异常细胞学的阴道镜转诊(95.8%)的依从性高。自采样应答者的 CIN2+/CIN3+/癌的检出率分别为 1.5%、1.0%和 0.1%。总之,向未能参加的女性提供巴氏刷阴道自采样的 hrHPV 检测显著增加了对常规筛查项目的参与率,在患有 CIN2+/CIN3+的女性中,hrHPV 检测结果与医生取样的刮片结果非常一致,并且可以有效检测出 CIN2+/CIN3+。

相似文献

1
Experience with high-risk human papillomavirus testing on vaginal brush-based self-samples of non-attendees of the cervical screening program.高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测在未参加宫颈癌筛查项目的阴道刷自采样中的应用经验。
Int J Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;130(5):1128-35. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26128. Epub 2011 May 30.
2
Comparative performance of novel self-sampling methods in detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in 30,130 women not attending cervical screening.30130名未参加宫颈筛查女性中新型自我采样方法检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒的比较性能
Int J Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;136(3):646-55. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29026. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
3
Offering self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing to non-attendees of the cervical screening programme: Characteristics of the responders.为未参加宫颈癌筛查项目的人群提供人乳头瘤病毒自我采样检测:应答者特征。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Aug;48(12):1799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.022. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
4
DNA methylation analysis in self-sampled brush material as a triage test in hrHPV-positive women.对自我采集的刷取样本进行DNA甲基化分析,作为高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)阳性女性的分流检测。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 9;111(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.392. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
5
Effectiveness of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in China: A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial.中国宫颈癌筛查中高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测的效果:一项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;7(2):263-270. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6575.
6
HPV testing in first-void urine provides sensitivity for CIN2+ detection comparable with a smear taken by a clinician or a brush-based self-sample: cross-sectional data from a triage population.在首次排空尿液中进行 HPV 检测对 CIN2+ 的检出灵敏度与临床医生取样或刷子自采样相当:来自分层人群的横断面数据。
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1356-1363. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14682.
7
Human papillomavirus testing on self-sampled cervicovaginal brushes: an effective alternative to protect nonresponders in cervical screening programs.对自行采集的宫颈阴道刷进行人乳头瘤病毒检测:在宫颈筛查项目中保护无反应者的有效替代方法。
Int J Cancer. 2007 Apr 1;120(7):1505-10. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22484.
8
Brush-based self-sampling in combination with GP5+/6+-PCR-based hrHPV testing: high concordance with physician-taken cervical scrapes for HPV genotyping and detection of high-grade CIN.毛刷取样联合 GP5+/6+-PCR 检测人乳头瘤病毒:与医师采集的宫颈刮片相比,在 HPV 基因分型和检测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变方面具有高度一致性。
J Clin Virol. 2012 Jun;54(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
9
Triage by methylation-marker testing versus cytology in women who test HPV-positive on self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (PROHTECT-3): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.基于自行采集的宫颈阴道标本 HPV 阳性女性中应用甲基化标志物检测行分流与细胞学检测的比较(PROHTECT-3):一项随机对照非劣效性试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):315-22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70019-1. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method.HPV 自我采样 DNA 检测作为宫颈癌初筛方法的汇总分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Feb 8;104(3):178-88. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr532. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Validation of a Vaginal Cervical Cancer Screening Self-Collection Method for At-Home Use: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.一种用于居家使用的阴道宫颈癌筛查自我采样方法的临床验证:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11081.
2
Juntas Contra el Virus del Papiloma Humano: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of an HPV self-sampling intervention for underscreened Latinas.联合对抗人乳头瘤病毒:一项针对筛查不足的拉丁裔女性进行人乳头瘤病毒自我采样干预的试点随机对照试验方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 May 10;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01648-y.
3
Identifying optimum implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling in underserved communities: A systematic review.
确定在服务不足社区中实施人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的最佳方法:一项系统综述。
J Med Screen. 2025 Mar;32(1):2-18. doi: 10.1177/09691413241274312. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
Evaluating human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among Latinas in the United States: A systematic review.评价美国拉丁裔人群中人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样:系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70098. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70098.
5
Evaluation of self-sampling-based cervical cancer screening strategy using HPV Selfy CE-IVD test coupled with home-collection kit: a clinical study in Italy.基于 HPV Selfy CE-IVD 检测试剂盒的自我采样宫颈癌筛查策略评估:意大利的一项临床研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Dec 11;28(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01263-8.
6
A Comprehensive Review of Cervical Cancer Screening Devices: The Pros and the Cons.宫颈癌筛查设备的全面综述:优缺点。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Jul 1;24(7):2207-2215. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.7.2207.
7
Acceptability of self-sampling human papillomavirus test for cervical cancer screening in Japan: A questionnaire survey in the ACCESS trial.日本宫颈癌筛查中人乳头瘤病毒自我采样检测的可接受性:ACCESS 试验中的问卷调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286909. eCollection 2023.
8
A comparative study on behavior, awareness and belief about cervical cancer among rural and urban women in Vietnam.越南城乡女性对宫颈癌的行为、认知与信念的比较研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 6;3(6):e0001817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001817. eCollection 2023.
9
Exploring factors associated with preferences for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among racially- and ethnically-diverse women in Minnesota: A cross-sectional study.探索明尼苏达州不同种族和族裔女性对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样偏好的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 13;34:102243. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102243. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials.自我采样用于人乳头瘤病毒检测是否有可能增加宫颈癌筛查?观察性研究和随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;10:1003461. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003461. eCollection 2022.