Gallus A S
Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1990 Jul;3(3):651-84. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3536(05)80023-x.
For 50 years, the key to successfully preventing venous thrombosis (VT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) among high-risk patients has been the judicious use of anticoagulants: first through full doses of oral anticoagulants and more recently through low-dose heparin prophylaxis. Low-dose heparin has become the standard of comparison for other preventive methods, since it is relatively safe and simple, its ability to prevent approximately 65% of the subclinical VT found by leg scanning after elective general surgery is well known, and recent meta-analysis of the many pertinent published clinical trials (large and small) strongly suggests a much greater benefit: a 65% reduction in the risk of postoperative death from major PE. In addition, there are trials that have also found low-dose heparin to be effective in general medical patients, although its value in this clinical setting is much less well documented. Although several effective approaches other than low-dose heparin are available, many of these tend to be either more cumbersome (intermittent external leg compression) or probably less powerful (graded pressure elastic stockings). There are situations where low-dose heparin prophylaxis fails, most obviously after orthopaedic surgery where the use of more complex regimens, including adjusted-dose heparin treatment and various schedules of warfarin prophylaxis, becomes appropriate. Recent progress has come from the intensive clinical exploration of various low molecular weight heparin fractions or fragments which appear to be effective after once daily administration to general surgical patients and show great promise of effectiveness and safety after hip surgery. The level of warfarin effect needed for VT prophylaxis has also been reinvestigated, with trials suggesting a need for less warfarin and a lower prothrombin time effect than was previously thought to be appropriate. Given that any attempts to minimize mortality from PE in hospital patients must rely on the widespread and systematic use of simple, safe, and cost-effective preventive methods, it is hoped that these advances will help move anticoagulant prophylaxis further out of the realm of clinical research and into that of common clinical practice.
50年来,成功预防高危患者静脉血栓形成(VT)或肺栓塞(PE)的关键在于合理使用抗凝剂:最初是通过全剂量口服抗凝剂,最近则是通过低剂量肝素预防。低剂量肝素已成为其他预防方法的比较标准,因为它相对安全简便,其预防择期普通外科手术后腿部扫描发现的约65%亚临床VT的能力广为人知,并且最近对众多相关已发表临床试验(无论大小)的荟萃分析强烈表明其益处更大:将主要PE导致的术后死亡风险降低65%。此外,有试验还发现低剂量肝素对普通内科患者有效,尽管其在这种临床环境中的价值记录较少。虽然除低剂量肝素外还有几种有效方法,但其中许多往往要么更麻烦(间歇性外部腿部压迫),要么可能效果较差(分级压力弹性袜)。在某些情况下,低剂量肝素预防会失败,最明显的是在骨科手术后,此时使用更复杂的方案,包括调整剂量的肝素治疗和各种华法林预防方案就变得合适。最近的进展来自对各种低分子量肝素级分或片段的深入临床探索,这些片段似乎在对普通外科患者每日给药一次后有效,并且在髋关节手术后显示出有效性和安全性的巨大前景。VT预防所需的华法林效应水平也得到了重新研究,试验表明所需的华法林剂量和凝血酶原时间效应比以前认为合适的要低。鉴于任何降低住院患者PE死亡率的尝试都必须依赖于广泛且系统地使用简单、安全且具有成本效益的预防方法,希望这些进展将有助于使抗凝预防进一步从临床研究领域进入普通临床实践领域。