• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视服务于作者和编辑工作的信息技术工具:以案例为导向的统计分析与剽窃检测教程。

Revisiting Information Technology tools serving authorship and editorship: a case-guided tutorial to statistical analysis and plagiarism detection.

作者信息

Bamidis P D, Lithari C, Konstantinidis S T

机构信息

Lab of Medical Informatics, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):38-48.

PMID:21487489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3049420/
Abstract

With the number of scientific papers published in journals, conference proceedings, and international literature ever increasing, authors and reviewers are not only facilitated with an abundance of information, but unfortunately continuously confronted with risks associated with the erroneous copy of another's material. In parallel, Information Communication Technology (ICT) tools provide to researchers novel and continuously more effective ways to analyze and present their work. Software tools regarding statistical analysis offer scientists the chance to validate their work and enhance the quality of published papers. Moreover, from the reviewers and the editor's perspective, it is now possible to ensure the (text-content) originality of a scientific article with automated software tools for plagiarism detection. In this paper, we provide a step-bystep demonstration of two categories of tools, namely, statistical analysis and plagiarism detection. The aim is not to come up with a specific tool recommendation, but rather to provide useful guidelines on the proper use and efficiency of either category of tools. In the context of this special issue, this paper offers a useful tutorial to specific problems concerned with scientific writing and review discourse. A specific neuroscience experimental case example is utilized to illustrate the young researcher's statistical analysis burden, while a test scenario is purpose-built using open access journal articles to exemplify the use and comparative outputs of seven plagiarism detection software pieces.

摘要

随着发表在期刊、会议论文集和国际文献中的科学论文数量不断增加,作者和审稿人不仅能获取大量信息,不幸的是,他们也不断面临与抄袭他人材料相关的风险。与此同时,信息通信技术(ICT)工具为研究人员提供了新颖且日益有效的分析和展示其研究成果的方法。统计分析软件工具为科学家提供了验证其研究成果并提高已发表论文质量的机会。此外,从审稿人和编辑的角度来看,现在可以使用自动化的抄袭检测软件工具来确保科学文章(文本内容)的原创性。在本文中,我们逐步演示两类工具,即统计分析和抄袭检测工具。目的不是给出具体的工具推荐,而是就这两类工具的正确使用和效率提供有用的指导方针。在本期特刊的背景下,本文为与科学写作和审稿相关的具体问题提供了有用的教程。利用一个具体的神经科学实验案例来阐述年轻研究人员的统计分析负担,同时专门构建一个测试场景,使用开放获取期刊文章来举例说明七款抄袭检测软件的使用方法和比较结果。

相似文献

1
Revisiting Information Technology tools serving authorship and editorship: a case-guided tutorial to statistical analysis and plagiarism detection.重新审视服务于作者和编辑工作的信息技术工具:以案例为导向的统计分析与剽窃检测教程。
Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):38-48.
2
Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals.掠夺性期刊中的抄袭行为:三个护理期刊的比较研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):356-363. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12475. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing.在科学写作过程中了解并避免抄袭。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Sep;4(Suppl 3):S193-8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.141957.
4
Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments and education.基于文本的科学出版中的剽窃:问题、发展与教育。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1241-54. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9367-6. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
5
[Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity].[剽窃与掠夺性期刊:对科学诚信的威胁]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;90(1):57.e1-57.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Plagiarism: what is it, whom does it offend, and how does one deal with it?剽窃:它是什么,它冒犯了谁,以及如何应对它?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Sep;161(3):479-84. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352091.
8
The confounding factors leading to plagiarism in academic writing and some suggested remedies: A systematic review.学术写作中导致抄袭的混杂因素及一些建议的补救措施:一项系统综述。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):767-772.
9
Similarity Index Analysis of the Manuscript: A Viewpoint.稿件的相似度指数分析:一种观点
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1125.
10
Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.荟萃分析:俄罗斯出版物存在的问题。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S89-90. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150702.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Web mining and exploitation for serious applications: Technosocial Predictive Analytics and related technologies for public health, environmental and national security surveillance.社交网络挖掘与利用的严肃应用:社会技术预测分析及相关技术在公共卫生、环境和国家安全监测中的应用。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010 Oct;100(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
2
MADAM - An open source meta-analysis toolbox for R and Bioconductor.MADAM - 一个用于R和Bioconductor的开源荟萃分析工具箱。
Source Code Biol Med. 2010 Mar 1;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-5-3.
3
Are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? A neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions.女性对情绪刺激更敏感吗?一项跨越唤醒度和效价维度的神经生理学研究。
Brain Topogr. 2010 Mar;23(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
4
Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students' perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty.本科生和研究生药学学生对剽窃和学术诚信的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):105. doi: 10.5688/aj7306105.
5
Duplicate publication--An unacceptable practice.重复发表——一种不可接受的行为。
Poult Sci. 2009 Mar;88(3):455. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00030.
6
Detection of duplicates and redundancies. A major responsibility of peer-reviewers?检测重复和冗余内容。同行评审人员的一项主要职责?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(12):1796-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.350.
7
Deja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature.似曾相识:科学文献中高度相似引用的数据库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D921-4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn546. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
8
Plagiarism: words and ideas.抄袭:文字与观点。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Sep;14(3):311-22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6.
9
Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing?有没有一种有效的方法来阻止学生抄袭?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Mar;14(1):139-47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9037-2. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
10
From intermediation to disintermediation and apomediation: new models for consumers to access and assess the credibility of health information in the age of Web2.0.从媒介中介到去中介化和非中介化:Web2.0时代消费者获取和评估健康信息可信度的新模式。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):162-6.