• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用特定生活质量和结局反应-静脉(SQOR-V)问卷的前瞻性研究中,回忆偏倚的大小与最小有意义差异相同。

In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference.

机构信息

University of Hawaii, Hawaii, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1589-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9910-y. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-9910-y
PMID:21487933
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the measurement error, and recall bias can reach magnitudes comparable to minimally important difference (MID) in symptoms scores used in chronic venous disease-specific quality of life QOL instruments, such as Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire.

METHODS

Prospective non-randomized study of 150 patients with primary chronic venous disease. SQOR-V questionnaire was administered prior to clinical visit (in 32 patients twice), and 1 month post-treatment. Patients were asked to recall their symptoms 12 months later. Measurement error (SEM) was calculated from repeated baseline measurements. MID was derived from change in the symptom score (SS) part of the SQOR-V questionnaire at 1 month. Recall bias was calculated from 12-month recall data.

RESULTS

SEM was 1.91, the recall bias was -3.16 (95% CI from -4.08 to -2.24), and the MID was 3.7. In the treatment group the recall bias was negative (recall more severe symptoms than they actually were at the baseline), patients in the observation group had positive recall bias. SS change moderately correlated with transition rating index (Spearman rank-order correlation 0.526, P < 0.0001), and strongly correlated with the baseline value (Pearson r = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

The measurement error of patient-reported symptoms scores included in disease-specific QOL instruments is small, but recall bias is close in magnitude to MID.

摘要

目的

评估慢性静脉疾病特定生活质量(QOL)工具中症状评分的测量误差和回忆偏倚是否可达到与最小有意义差异(MID)相当的程度,例如特定 QOL 和结局反应-静脉(SQOR-V)问卷。

方法

对 150 例原发性慢性静脉疾病患者进行前瞻性非随机研究。在临床就诊前(32 例患者两次)和治疗后 1 个月时,使用 SQOR-V 问卷进行评估。要求患者在 12 个月后回忆他们的症状。从重复的基线测量中计算测量误差(SEM)。MID 源自 SQOR-V 问卷中症状评分(SS)部分在 1 个月时的变化。从 12 个月的回忆数据中计算回忆偏倚。

结果

SEM 为 1.91,回忆偏倚为-3.16(95%置信区间为-4.08 至-2.24),MID 为 3.7。在治疗组中,回忆偏倚为负值(回忆起比基线时更严重的症状),观察组患者的回忆偏倚为正值。SS 变化与过渡评分指数中度相关(Spearman 等级相关 0.526,P < 0.0001),与基线值高度相关(Pearson r = 0.84)。

结论

包含在疾病特异性 QOL 工具中的患者报告症状评分的测量误差较小,但回忆偏倚与 MID 相当。

相似文献

1
In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference.在使用特定生活质量和结局反应-静脉(SQOR-V)问卷的前瞻性研究中,回忆偏倚的大小与最小有意义差异相同。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1589-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9910-y. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
Construction and validation of a patient-reported outcome dedicated to chronic venous disorders: SQOR-V (specific quality of life and outcome response - venous).一种用于慢性静脉疾病的患者报告结局的构建与验证:SQOR-V(特定生活质量和结局反应 - 静脉)。
J Mal Vasc. 2007 Jul;32(3):135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jmv.2007.05.004.
3
A study to compare disease-specific quality of life with clinical anatomical and hemodynamic assessments in patients with varicose veins.一项旨在比较静脉曲张患者疾病特异性生活质量与临床解剖和血液动力学评估的研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Feb;53(2):374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.022. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
4
Recall of pretreatment symptoms among men treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.接受前列腺癌放射治疗的男性患者治疗前症状的回顾。
Acta Oncol. 2005;44(4):355-61. doi: 10.1080/02841860510029806.
5
The patient's burden of chronic venous disorders: construction of a questionnaire.
Phlebology. 2010 Dec;25(6):280-5. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2010.010039.
6
Validation of the 4 week recall version of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-related Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) Questionnaire.子宫肌瘤症状与健康相关生活质量(UFS-QOL)问卷4周回忆版的验证
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):193-200. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248382. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ(®) Instrument.一种用于静脉曲张的新型患者报告结局(PRO)症状日记的心理测量评估:VVSymQ(®) 工具
Patient. 2016 Aug;9(4):335-48. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3.
8
Comparison of disease-specific quality of life tools in patients with chronic venous disease.慢性静脉疾病患者特定疾病生活质量工具的比较
Phlebology. 2014 Dec;29(10):648-53. doi: 10.1177/0268355513501302. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
9
Recall of health-related quality of life: how does memory affect the SF-6D in patients with psoriasis or multiple sclerosis? A prospective observational study in Germany.健康相关生活质量的回忆:记忆如何影响银屑病或多发性硬化症患者的 SF-6D?德国一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032859.
10
Do Cervical Spine Surgery Patients Recall Their Preoperative Status?: A Cohort Study of Recall Bias in Patient-reported Outcomes.颈椎手术患者能回忆起他们术前的状态吗?一项关于患者报告结局中回忆偏倚的队列研究。
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Dec;31(10):E481-E487. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000726.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review.非手术干预后膝关节骨关节炎结局测量工具的最小有意义变化和差异:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 18;13(5):e063026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026.
2
How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Adolescents' Use of Technologies, Sense of Community, and Loneliness: A Retrospective Perception Analysis.新冠疫情如何改变青少年的技术使用、社区感和孤独感:一项回顾性认知分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 13;12(7):228. doi: 10.3390/bs12070228.

本文引用的文献

1
Mathematical coupling may account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important difference values.数学耦合可能解释了基线严重程度和最小有意义差异值之间的关联。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):865-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.004. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
2
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods.注意 MIC:人群和方法之间存在较大差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):524-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
3
Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift.
正式的测量偏差和解释偏差的定义阐明了反应转移的测量和概念观点。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;62(11):1126-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
4
Specific HRQL instruments and symptom scores were more responsive than preference-based generic instruments in patients with GERD.在胃食管反流病患者中,特定的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)工具和症状评分比基于偏好的通用工具更具反应性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
5
Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population--results from the Bonn Vein Study, Germany.普通人群浅静脉和深静脉系统反流的分布及患病率——德国波恩静脉研究结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
6
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
7
Mapping the future: organizational, clinical, and research priorities in venous disease.
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46 Suppl S:84S-93S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.049.
8
Recommended reporting standards for endovenous ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency: joint statement of The American Venous Forum and The Society of Interventional Radiology.用于治疗静脉功能不全的腔内消融术推荐报告标准:美国静脉论坛和介入放射学会联合声明
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep;46(3):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.025.
9
Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures.用于估计健康相关生活质量测量中最小重要差异的方法和建议。
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):63-7. doi: 10.1081/copd-200050663.
10
When to use agreement versus reliability measures.何时使用一致性测量与可靠性测量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015. Epub 2006 Aug 10.