Normando Thiene Silva, Calçada Flávio Siqueira, Ursi Weber José da Silva, Normando David
Department of Orthodontics, São Paulo Association of Dentistry at São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e29-34.
To examine the level of discomfort and pain reported by patients during debonding of orthodontic metallic brackets by comparing two of the most popular methods, since discomfort can negatively influence patients' motivation to undergo orthodontic treatment.
This split-mouth designed study involved 37 patients. Two methods were used for bracket removal: a lift-off debonding instrument and a ligature-cutting plier. The level of discomfort during debonding was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 4; The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was taken into consideration, as well. Comparison between the methods was statistically analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank and chi-squared tests (P<.05).
Regarding the remnant adhesive, no significant difference was observed between the methods. Patients' reports of pain (score ≥2) were observed in 24.3% of teeth when the brackets were removed using a ligature-cutting plier, while there was a 12.8% report of pain when the lift-off instrument was employed (odds ratio [OR]=2.17, P<.001, χ(2)=17.7). Statistically significant lower scores for maxillary (P=.02) and mandibular central incisors (P=.02), maxillary lateral incisors (P=.02), mandibular canines (P=.00), and mandibular premolars (P=.00/.02) were reported when the lift-off instrument was employed.
For the removal of orthodontic brackets, the lift-off instrument is better accepted by patients compared to the ligature cutting pliers, given that reports of pain are about two times lower with the former. The ARI was the same for both methods.
通过比较两种最常用的方法,研究正畸金属托槽拆除过程中患者报告的不适和疼痛程度,因为不适会对患者接受正畸治疗的积极性产生负面影响。
这项采用双侧对照设计的研究纳入了37名患者。使用两种方法拆除托槽:一种是直接取下式脱粘器械,另一种是结扎切断钳。脱粘过程中的不适程度采用0至4分进行评估;同时也考虑了粘接剂残留指数(ARI)。使用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验及卡方检验对两种方法进行统计学比较(P<0.05)。
在残留粘接剂方面,两种方法之间未观察到显著差异。使用结扎切断钳拆除托槽时,24.3%的牙齿患者报告有疼痛(评分≥2分),而使用直接取下式器械时,报告疼痛的比例为12.8%(优势比[OR]=2.17,P<0.001,χ²=17.7)。使用直接取下式器械时,上颌(P=0.02)和下颌中切牙(P=0.02)、上颌侧切牙(P=0.02)、下颌尖牙(P=0.00)以及下颌前磨牙(P=0.00/0.02)的疼痛评分在统计学上显著更低。
对于正畸托槽的拆除,与结扎切断钳相比,直接取下式器械更易被患者接受,因为前者的疼痛报告约低两倍。两种方法的ARI相同。