Navarrete Rocío, Domínguez Juan M, Granados María del Mar, Morgaz Juan, Fernández Andrés, Gómez-Villamandos Rafael J
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Córdoba University, Córdoba, Spain.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011 May;38(3):178-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00598.x.
To compare the sedative effects of three doses of romifidine with one dose of medetomidine.
Prospective blinded experimental cross-over.
Five adult Domestic Short Hair cats.
Cats were administered romifidine at 80, 120 and 160 μg kg(-1) or medetomidine at 20 μg kg(-1) (M20) intramuscularly (IM). Sedative effects were assessed for 3 hours by summing the scores given to posture, auditory response, resistance to positioning, muscular relaxation, and response to noxious stimuli, giving a total sedation score (TS). The area under the curve (AUC) of TS ≥7 (the score considered as clinically useful sedation) was calculated. Times to stages of sedation were determined. Some physiological parameters were measured. Data to compare treatments were analysed by anova or Kruskal-Wallis test as relevant.
All treatments gave a TS considered clinically useful. There were no significant differences between treatments for times to onset of sedation, maximum TS reached, or AUC. Differences between romifidine treatments for other sedation parameters were not significant but the time to maximum TS and to recovery was shortest in M20. Heart rate (HR) fell significantly with all treatments and, although with M20 it recovered at 65 minutes, it remained significantly depressed for 3 hours after all romifidine treatments. Most cats vomited, and/or hypersalivated after all treatments.
Doses of 80, 120 and 160 μg kg(-1) romifidine IM produce sedation in cats which is similar to that following medetomidine 20 μg kg(-1) . Recovery from sedation and of physiological parameters was quickest after M20.
Doses of romifidine considerably lower than those investigated by previous authors give a clinically useful level of sedation, and their use might result in less side effects and a quicker recovery.
比较三种剂量的罗米非定与一剂美托咪定的镇静效果。
前瞻性盲法实验交叉研究。
五只成年家养短毛猫。
给猫肌肉注射80、120和160μg/kg的罗米非定或20μg/kg的美托咪定(M20)。通过对姿势、听觉反应、对体位的抵抗、肌肉松弛和对有害刺激的反应评分求和,评估3小时的镇静效果,得出总镇静评分(TS)。计算TS≥7(被认为是临床有效镇静的评分)的曲线下面积(AUC)。确定达到镇静阶段的时间。测量一些生理参数。根据情况,采用方差分析或克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验分析比较各治疗组的数据。
所有治疗组的TS均被认为具有临床有效性。各治疗组在镇静起效时间、达到的最大TS或AUC方面无显著差异。罗米非定各治疗组在其他镇静参数上的差异不显著,但M20组达到最大TS和恢复的时间最短。所有治疗组的心率(HR)均显著下降,虽然M20组在65分钟时恢复,但所有罗米非定治疗组在3小时后心率仍显著低于正常水平。所有治疗后,大多数猫出现呕吐和/或流涎过多。
肌肉注射80、120和160μg/kg的罗米非定在猫中产生的镇静效果与20μg/kg美托咪定相似。M20组镇静及生理参数恢复最快。
罗米非定的剂量远低于先前作者研究的剂量,但仍能达到临床有效的镇静水平,其使用可能会减少副作用并加快恢复。