Suppr超能文献

低强度调整剂量华法林预防血液透析导管失败:一项随机对照试验。

Low-intensity adjusted-dose warfarin for the prevention of hemodialysis catheter failure: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 May;6(5):1018-24. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07240810. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To determine whether warfarin prolongs the time to first mechanical-catheter failure.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This was a multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial with blinding of participants, trial staff, clinical staff, outcome assessors, and data analysts. Randomization was in a 1:1 ratio in blocks of four and was concealed by use of fax to a central pharmacy. Hemodialysis patients with newly-placed catheters received low-intensity monitored-dose warfarin, target international normalized ratio (INR) 1.5 to 1.9, or placebo, adjusted according to schedule of sham INR results. The primary outcome was time to first mechanical-catheter failure (inability to establish a circuit or blood flow less than 200 ml/min).

RESULTS

We randomized 174 patients: 87 to warfarin and 87 to placebo. Warfarin was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.90 (P=0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57, 1.38) for time to first mechanical-catheter failure. Secondary analyses were: time to first guidewire exchange or catheter removal for mechanical failure (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.37, 1.6); time to catheter removal for mechanical failure (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.19, 2.37); and time to catheter removal for any cause (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.42, 1.81). Major bleeding occurred in 10 participants assigned to warfarin and seven on placebo (relative risk, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.57, 3.58; P=0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for efficacy of low-intensity, monitored-dose warfarin in preventing mechanical-catheter failure.

摘要

背景与目的

确定华法林是否会延长首次机械导管故障的时间。

设计、地点、参与者和测量:这是一项多中心平行组随机对照试验,参与者、试验人员、临床人员、结果评估人员和数据分析师均设为盲法。采用四组随机分组,组间以 1:1 比例进行随机化,分组通过传真隐藏至中央药房。新置入导管的血液透析患者接受低强度监测剂量华法林治疗,目标国际标准化比值(INR)为 1.5 至 1.9,或安慰剂治疗,根据模拟 INR 结果的时间表进行调整。主要结局是首次发生机械导管故障(无法建立回路或血流小于 200ml/min)的时间。

结果

我们共随机分配了 174 名患者:87 名接受华法林治疗,87 名接受安慰剂治疗。华法林治疗与首次发生机械导管故障的时间的风险比(HR)为 0.90(P=0.60;95%置信区间[CI],0.57,1.38)。次要分析结果为:首次因机械故障而需要交换导丝或导管取出的时间(HR 0.78;95% CI,0.37,1.6);因机械故障而需要导管取出的时间(HR 0.67;95% CI,0.19,2.37);以及因任何原因而需要导管取出的时间(HR 0.89;95% CI,0.42,1.81)。10 名接受华法林治疗的患者和 7 名接受安慰剂治疗的患者发生了主要出血(相对风险,1.43;95% CI,0.57,3.58;P=0.61)。

结论

我们没有发现低强度、监测剂量华法林在预防机械导管故障方面有任何疗效证据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Strategies to Prevent Hemodialysis Catheter Dysfunction.预防血液透析导管功能障碍的策略。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 May 1;36(5):952-966. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000666. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.导管相关血栓形成的综合综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 21;13(24):7818. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247818.
4
Thrombosis and anticoagulation in the setting of renal or liver disease.肾脏或肝脏疾病背景下的血栓形成与抗凝
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016 Dec 2;2016(1):188-195. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.188.
9
American Society of Nephrology Quiz and Questionnaire 2013: RRT.美国肾脏病学会2013年测验与问卷:肾脏替代治疗
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):1497-503. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12711213. Epub 2014 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群与华法林用于房颤患者的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. Epub 2009 Aug 30.
6
Major bleeding in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者的严重出血
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):105-10. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01810407. Epub 2007 Nov 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验