Suppr超能文献

神经性厌食症的心理治疗:标准化均数变化的荟萃分析。

Psychological treatment for anorexia nervosa: a meta-analysis of standardized mean change.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. armin.hartmann @ uniklinik-freiburg.de

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2011;80(4):216-26. doi: 10.1159/000322360. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For the German treatment guidelines for eating disorders, the literature on psychological treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) was reviewed systematically. As a common meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials proved to be impossible, a review of all available clinical trials was conducted, statistically integrating standardized mean change scores. Research questions comprised differential effects of therapeutic techniques and settings as well as determining which weight gains could be expected.

METHODS

After an extensive literature search, studies were selected, rated by 3 independent raters. Weight gain as the main outcome criterion was transformed into standardized mean change scores. Effect sizes were checked for homogeneity.

RESULTS

57 studies containing 84 treatment arms and 2,273 patients could be integrated. Studies differed considerably in quality. The strongest bias identified was reporting selectively on completers or failures, versus intention-to-treat samples. No significant differences between effect sizes could be identified concerning treatment setting, technique or patient characteristics. If treatment time is taken into account, inpatient treatment produced a faster weight gain than outpatient treatment.

CONCLUSION

The study describes weight gains which can be reached in outpatient and inpatient settings. It yielded no salient results speaking for a certain therapy technique, setting or procedure. Treatment guidelines for psychological treatment of AN still have to rely on lower level evidence.

摘要

背景

为了制定德国饮食失调症治疗指南,对神经性厌食症(AN)的心理治疗文献进行了系统回顾。由于常见的随机临床试验荟萃分析是不可能的,因此进行了所有可用临床试验的综述,并对标准化均数差值进行了统计学整合。研究问题包括治疗技术和环境的差异效应,以及确定可以预期的体重增加。

方法

经过广泛的文献搜索,选择了研究,并由 3 名独立评估者进行评估。主要结局标准体重增加被转化为标准化均数差值。对效应大小进行了同质性检查。

结果

可整合 57 项研究,共包含 84 个治疗组和 2273 名患者。研究在质量上存在很大差异。最明显的偏倚是选择性报告完成者或失败,而非意向治疗样本。治疗环境、技术或患者特征方面的效应大小没有显著差异。如果考虑治疗时间,住院治疗比门诊治疗的体重增加更快。

结论

本研究描述了门诊和住院治疗可达到的体重增加。它没有产生支持某种治疗技术、环境或程序的明显结果。AN 的心理治疗治疗指南仍需依赖低水平证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验