Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263rd Street, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 27;14(7):1396. doi: 10.3390/nu14071396.
In the USA, family-based treatment (FBT) with inpatient medical stabilization as needed is the leading evidence-based treatment for youth with anorexia nervosa (AN). In continental Europe, typically inpatient multimodal treatment targeting weight recovery followed by outpatient care (IMT) is standard care, if prior outpatient treatment was not sufficient. Our aim was to compare weekly weight gain and hospital days over six months for adolescents receiving FBT (USA) versus IMT (Germany) using naturalistic treatment data. To yield similar subgroups of youth aged 12−18 years, inclusion criteria were a percent median BMI (%mBMI) between 70−85 and the restrictive AN subtype. Weight gain and hospital days were compared, adjusted further in a multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) for baseline group differences. Samples differed on baseline %mBMI (FBT [n = 71], 90.5 ± 12.8; IMT [n = 29], 78.3 ± 9.1, p < 0.05). In subgroups with comparable baseline %mBMI, the weekly weight gain over 6 months was similar (FBT [n = 21]: 0.35 ± 0.18 kg/week; IMT [n = 20]: 0.30 ± 0.18, p = 0.390, p = 0.166 after MLRA), but achieved fewer hospital days in FBT (FBT [n = 7]: 4 ± 6 days, IMT [n = 20]: 121 ± 42 days, p < 0.0001 before and after MLRA). FBT may be effective for a subgroup of adolescents with AN currently receiving IMT, but head-to-head studies in the same healthcare system are needed.
在美国,针对青少年神经性厌食症(AN)的以家庭为基础的治疗(FBT)结合按需住院医疗稳定治疗是主要的循证治疗方法。在欧洲大陆,典型的针对体重恢复的住院多模式治疗(IMT),随后是门诊治疗(如果之前的门诊治疗不够充分),是标准护理。我们的目的是使用自然治疗数据比较接受 FBT(美国)与 IMT(德国)的青少年在六个月内每周体重增加和住院天数。为了产生年龄在 12-18 岁之间相似的青年亚组,纳入标准是中位数 BMI 百分比(%mBMI)在 70-85 之间,以及限制型 AN 亚型。比较体重增加和住院天数,在多元线性回归分析(MLRA)中进一步调整基线组差异。样本在基线%mBMI 上存在差异(FBT [n = 71],90.5 ± 12.8;IMT [n = 29],78.3 ± 9.1,p < 0.05)。在基线%mBMI 可比的亚组中,六个月内每周体重增加相似(FBT [n = 21]:0.35 ± 0.18 kg/周;IMT [n = 20]:0.30 ± 0.18,p = 0.390,p = 0.166 在 MLRA 后),但 FBT 的住院天数较少(FBT [n = 7]:4 ± 6 天,IMT [n = 20]:121 ± 42 天,p < 0.0001 在 MLRA 前后)。FBT 可能对目前接受 IMT 的 AN 青少年亚组有效,但需要在同一医疗体系中进行头对头研究。