• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对美国预防服务工作组 2009 年关于乳房 X 光筛查建议的反应。

The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.

机构信息

RTI International, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027
PMID:21496748
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On November 16, 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released new breast cancer screening recommendations, resulting in considerable controversy.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the volume and framing of the public discourse around the mammography recommendations and determine if women were knowledgeable about the new recommendations.

METHODS

Two different types of data collection methods were used for this study: (1) a content analysis of news stories and social media posts around the time of the USPSTF announcement and (2) a web-based survey of women aged 40-74 years conducted through Knowledge Networks from December 17, 2009, to January 6, 2010. Data were analyzed in 2010.

RESULTS

The survey sample included 1221 women aged 40-74 years who had never had breast cancer. The majority of the articles and posts (51.9%) did not support the screening recommendations, and 17.6% were supportive. Less than one quarter of the sample could identify the new recommendations for women aged 40-49 years and 50-74 years. Results from logistic regression analyses identified characteristics associated with correct knowledge of the recommendations for each age group. Level of attention paid to the recommendations was significantly associated with accurate knowledge of the recommendations for each age group. Having a mammogram within the past 2 years, "other" race (i.e., not black or white), and having higher levels of education, confidence that recommendations were based on the latest research, and attention paid to the new guidelines were all significantly and positively associated with correct knowledge of the new recommendation for women aged 40-49 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The new recommendations confused women (30.0%) more than they helped them understand when to get a mammogram (6.2%). Confusion was greatest among women aged 40-49 years and women who had never had a mammogram or who had one more than 2 years ago. Communication about future recommendations should be pretested to identify strategies and language that may reduce confusion among providers, consumers, and advocacy groups.

摘要

背景

2009 年 11 月 16 日,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)发布了新的乳腺癌筛查建议,引发了广泛争议。

目的

本研究旨在评估围绕乳房 X 光检查建议的公众讨论的规模和框架,并确定女性是否了解新建议。

方法

本研究使用了两种不同的数据收集方法:(1)USPSTF 公告发布前后的新闻报道和社交媒体帖子的内容分析;(2)通过 Knowledge Networks 于 2009 年 12 月 17 日至 2010 年 1 月 6 日对 40-74 岁女性进行的基于网络的调查。数据分析于 2010 年进行。

结果

调查样本包括 1221 名从未患有乳腺癌的 40-74 岁女性。大多数文章和帖子(51.9%)不支持筛查建议,17.6%表示支持。不到四分之一的样本能够识别出针对 40-49 岁和 50-74 岁女性的新建议。逻辑回归分析的结果确定了与每个年龄组正确了解建议相关的特征。对建议的关注程度与每个年龄组对建议的准确了解显著相关。在过去 2 年内接受过乳房 X 光检查、“其他”种族(即非黑或白人)、受教育程度较高、对建议基于最新研究的信心以及对新指南的关注,与正确了解 40-49 岁女性的新建议显著正相关。

结论

新建议让女性感到困惑(30.0%)多于帮助她们了解何时进行乳房 X 光检查(6.2%)。40-49 岁的女性以及从未接受过乳房 X 光检查或接受检查超过 2 年的女性困惑最大。关于未来建议的沟通应进行预测试,以确定可能减少提供者、消费者和倡导团体混淆的策略和语言。

相似文献

1
The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.公众对美国预防服务工作组 2009 年关于乳房 X 光筛查建议的反应。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027.
2
Dead by 50: lay expertise and breast cancer screening.早逝 50 岁:专家建议和乳腺癌筛查。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
3
Media coverage of U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: a commentary.美国预防服务工作组建议的媒体报道:一篇评论
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):579-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.009.
4
Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge and opinions about the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) committee, the Women's Health Amendment, and the Affordable Care Act: national study after the release of the USPSTF 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation Statement.妇产科医生对美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)委员会、《妇女健康修正案》及《平价医疗法案》的了解与看法:USPSTF 2009年乳腺癌筛查建议声明发布后的全国性研究
Prev Med. 2014 Feb;59:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
5
Omissions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.美国预防服务工作组的疏漏之处。
Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):305; author reply 305-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10102097.
6
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.美国预防服务工作组的乳房 X 光筛查建议:被忽视的科学。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609.
7
The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn.2009年美国预防服务工作组的指南忽视了重要的科学证据,应该进行修订或撤销。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):15-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100057.
8
Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines.相互冲突且不断变化的乳腺癌筛查建议:2009年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)指南发布后对全国妇产科医生样本的调查研究
J Healthc Qual. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):25-35. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12009. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Behavioral consequences of conflict-oriented health news coverage: the 2009 mammography guideline controversy and online information seeking.面向冲突的健康新闻报道的行为后果:2009 年乳腺 X 光检查指南争议和在线信息搜索。
Health Commun. 2012;27(2):158-66. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.571757. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
10
Clarifying the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2005 recommendations.解读美国预防服务工作组2005年的建议。
J Fam Pract. 2006 May;55(5):425-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A pragmatic randomized trial to compare strategies for implementing primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large healthcare system.一项实用随机试验,旨在比较在一个大型医疗系统中实施原发性人乳头瘤病毒检测用于常规宫颈癌筛查的策略。
Implement Sci. 2025 May 12;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01432-9.
2
Socioeconomic and Geographic Differences in Mammography Trends Following the 2009 USPSTF Policy Update.2009年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)政策更新后乳房X光检查趋势中的社会经济和地理差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58141.
3
Ethical and Methodological Considerations of Twitter Data for Public Health Research: Systematic Review.
用于公共卫生研究的 Twitter 数据的伦理和方法学考虑因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 29;24(11):e40380. doi: 10.2196/40380.
4
Why Was the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation So Objectionable? A Historical Analysis.为何美国预防服务工作组2009年的乳腺癌筛查建议如此遭人反对?一项历史分析。
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):702-721. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12583. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
The Impact of 4 Risk Communication Interventions on Cancer Screening Preferences and Knowledge.四种风险沟通干预措施对癌症筛查偏好和知识的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):387-397. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211039743. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Fatalism and exposure to health information from the media: examining the evidence for causal influence.宿命论与从媒体获取健康信息:审视因果影响的证据。
Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2017;41(3-4):298-320. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1387502. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
Prevalence and Potential Consequences of Exposure to Conflicting Information about Mammography: Results from Nationally-Representative Survey of U.S. Adults.美国成年人全国代表性调查:关于乳房 X 光检查的冲突信息暴露的流行率及其潜在后果。
Health Commun. 2023 Feb;38(2):349-362. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1951958. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
Screening Mammogram Adherence in Medically Underserved Women: Does Language Preference Matter?医疗资源匮乏人群中女性接受乳房 X 光筛查的情况:语言偏好是否重要?
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Aug;37(4):1076-1082. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01922-y. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Framing the Clinical Encounter: Shared Decision-Making, Mammography Screening, and Decision Satisfaction.构建临床医患交流框架:共同决策、乳腺 X 光筛查与决策满意度。
J Health Commun. 2020 Sep 1;25(9):681-691. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1838003. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
10
The Impact of Mammography Screening Guideline Changes Among Women Serving in the U.S. Military.美国女兵中乳腺 X 光筛查指南变化的影响。
Mil Med. 2020 Dec 30;185(11-12):e2088-e2096. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa176.