Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 5005 N. Piedras St., El Paso, TX 79920, USA.
Spine J. 2011 May;11(5):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
Prior research has identified disparities in access to care, resource utilization, and outcomes in members of racial and ethnic minorities. However, the role that race/ethnicity may play in influencing outcomes after spine surgery has not been previously studied.
To characterize the effect of race and ethnicity on outcome after spine surgery.
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Of 11 investigations selected in the initial analysis, four reported results in a fashion that enabled their inclusion in the meta-analysis. These four studies included a total of 128,635 patients.
"Favorable" or "unfavorable" postsurgical outcomes were determined based on parameters described in each included investigation.
A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies documenting outcomes, complications, or mortality after spine surgical procedures. Eligible studies had to include raw data that enabled separate analysis of white and nonwhite patients. Outcome was categorized as "favorable" or "unfavorable" based on scales included in each investigation. The Q-statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the relative risk for unfavorable outcome among nonwhite patients after spine surgery.
Eleven studies met initial selection criteria but only four were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 128,635 patients among whom 12,194 (9.5%) had unfavorable outcomes. Among white patients, 9.4% sustained an unfavorable outcome as compared with 10.4% of nonwhites.
In light of the small number of studies able to be included in the meta-analysis, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effect of race/ethnicity on outcome after spinal surgery. There is a pressing need for more robust research regarding spine surgical outcomes among different racial and ethnic minority groups.
先前的研究已经确定了在少数民族成员中存在医疗服务获取、资源利用和结果方面的差异。然而,种族/民族因素在脊柱手术后结果中的影响作用尚未被研究过。
描述种族和民族对脊柱手术后结果的影响。
系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
在最初的分析中选择的 11 项研究中有 4 项报告了可以纳入荟萃分析的结果。这四项研究共纳入了 128635 名患者。
“有利”或“不利”的术后结果是根据每项纳入研究中描述的参数来确定的。
进行系统文献回顾,以确定所有记录脊柱手术程序后结果、并发症或死亡率的研究。合格的研究必须包括原始数据,以便对白人患者和非白人患者进行单独分析。根据每项研究中包含的量表,将结果分类为“有利”或“不利”。使用 Q 统计量确定异质性,并进行荟萃分析以评估非白人患者脊柱手术后不良结果的相对风险。
有 11 项研究符合初始选择标准,但只有 4 项符合纳入荟萃分析的标准。荟萃分析纳入了 128635 名患者,其中 12194 名(9.5%)发生了不良结果。白人患者中有 9.4%发生了不利结果,而非白人患者中有 10.4%。
鉴于能够纳入荟萃分析的研究数量较少,因此不能就种族/民族对脊柱手术后结果的影响得出确定的结论。迫切需要对不同种族和民族的脊柱手术结果进行更有力的研究。