Pokorney Sean D, Hellkamp Anne S, Yancy Clyde W, Curtis Lesley H, Hammill Stephen C, Peterson Eric D, Masoudi Frederick A, Bhatt Deepak L, Al-Khalidi Hussein R, Heidenreich Paul A, Anstrom Kevin J, Fonarow Gregg C, Al-Khatib Sana M
From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.D.P., E.D.P., S.M.A.-K.), Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.D.P., A.S.H., L.H.C., E.D.P., H.R.A.-K., K.J.A., S.M.A.-K.), Durham, NC; Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (C.W.Y.); Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (S.C.H.); Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver (F.A.M.); Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.L.B.); Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (P.A.H.); and Division of Cardiology, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, CA (G.C.F.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):145-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001878. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Racial and ethnic minorities are under-represented in clinical trials of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). This analysis investigates the association between primary prevention ICDs and mortality among Medicare, racial/ethnic minority patients.
Data from Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry and National Cardiovascular Data Registry's ICD Registry were used to perform an adjusted comparative effectiveness analysis of primary prevention ICDs in Medicare, racial/ethnic minority patients (nonwhite race or Hispanic ethnicity). Mortality data were obtained from the Medicare denominator file. The relationship of ICD with survival was compared between minority and white non-Hispanic patients. Our analysis included 852 minority patients, 426 ICD and 426 matched non-ICD patients, and 2070 white non-Hispanic patients (1035 ICD and 1035 matched non-ICD patients). Median follow-up was 3.1 years. Median age was 73 years, and median ejection fraction was 23%. Adjusted 3-year mortality rates for minority ICD and non-ICD patients were 44.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2%-45.7%) and 54.3% (95% CI, 53.4%-55.1%), respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.98; P=0.034). White non-Hispanic patients receiving an ICD had lower adjusted 3-year mortality rates of 47.8% (95% CI, 47.3%-48.3%) compared with 57.3% (95% CI, 56.8%-57.9%) for those with no ICD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67%-0.83%; P<0.0001). There was no significant interaction between race/ethnicity and lower mortality risk with ICD (P=0.70).
Primary prevention ICDs are associated with lower mortality in nonwhite and Hispanic patients, similar to that seen in white, non-Hispanic patients. These data support a similar approach to ICD patient selection, regardless of race or ethnicity.
在原发性预防植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的临床试验中,少数族裔的代表性不足。本分析研究了医疗保险覆盖的少数族裔患者中,原发性预防ICD与死亡率之间的关联。
使用来自“遵循指南-心力衰竭注册研究”和国家心血管数据注册中心的ICD注册研究的数据,对医疗保险覆盖的少数族裔患者(非白人种族或西班牙裔)进行原发性预防ICD的校正比较有效性分析。死亡率数据来自医疗保险分母文件。比较了少数族裔患者与非西班牙裔白人患者中ICD与生存率的关系。我们的分析纳入了852名少数族裔患者,其中426名接受ICD治疗,426名匹配的未接受ICD治疗的患者,以及2070名非西班牙裔白人患者(1035名接受ICD治疗,1035名匹配的未接受ICD治疗的患者)。中位随访时间为3.1年。中位年龄为73岁,中位射血分数为23%。少数族裔接受ICD治疗和未接受ICD治疗患者的校正3年死亡率分别为44.9%(95%置信区间[CI],44.2%-45.7%)和54.3%(95%CI,53.4%-55.1%)(校正风险比,0.79;95%CI,0.63-0.98;P=0.034)。接受ICD治疗的非西班牙裔白人患者校正3年死亡率较低,为47.8%(95%CI,47.3%-48.3%),而未接受ICD治疗的患者为57.3%(95%CI,56.8%-57.9%)(校正风险比,0.75;95%CI,0.67%-0.83%;P<0.0001)。种族/族裔与ICD降低死亡风险之间无显著交互作用(P=0.70)。
原发性预防ICD与非白人和西班牙裔患者死亡率降低相关,与非西班牙裔白人患者相似。这些数据支持在ICD患者选择上采用类似方法,无论种族或族裔如何。