• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床表面和设备的清洁审核:谁清洁什么?

Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, Lanarkshire, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jul;78(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030. Epub 2011 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030
PMID:21497943
Abstract

Current guidelines recommend regular cleaning of clinical equipment. We monitored items on a surgical ward for predominant user, hand-touch frequency, cleaning responsibilities and measurement of organic soil. Equipment was assessed in triplicate against a cleanliness benchmark of 100 relative light units (RLU) using the Hygiena® ATP system. There were 44 items, of which 21 were cleaned by clinical support workers (CSWs), five by domestic staff; three by nurses, three by doctors, and 12 with no designated cleaning responsibility. Geometric mean RLUs ranged from 60 to 550/100 cm² for small items such as hand-gel containers, bed control, blood pressure cuff and clinical notes; with similar values of 80-540/100 cm² RLU for larger items such as electrocardiogram machine, defibrillator, trolleys and tables. Overall geometric mean was 249/100 cm² RLU for all surfaces, with 84% (37 of 44) items exceeding the 100RLU benchmark. Of 27 items cleaned by clinical staff, 24 (89%) failed the benchmark. Of 12 sites with no cleaning specification, 11 (92%) failed the benchmark. Three of seven 'clean' sites (<100/100 cm² RLU) were cleaned by domestic staff. Average log(10) RLU of surfaces cleaned by domestics were 64% lower compared with surfaces cleaned by CSWs (95% confidence interval: 35%, 80%; P=0.019). In conclusion, clinical equipment frequently demonstrates high levels of organic soil, whether or not items have assigned cleaning responsibility. These findings suggest that cleaning practices for clinical equipment may require review, along with education of staff with specific cleaning responsibilities.

摘要

目前的指南建议定期清洁临床设备。我们监测了一个外科病房的主要使用者、手触摸频率、清洁责任和有机污垢测量。使用 Hygiena® ATP 系统,根据 100 相对光单位 (RLU) 的清洁基准,对设备进行了三次评估。共有 44 件物品,其中 21 件由临床支持工作人员 (CSWs) 清洁,5 件由家政人员清洁;3 件由护士清洁,3 件由医生清洁,12 件无指定清洁责任。小型物品(如手部凝胶容器、病床控制、血压袖带和临床记录)的几何平均 RLU 范围为 60 至 550/100 cm²;较大物品(如心电图机、除颤器、手推车和桌子)的相似值为 80-540/100 cm² RLU。所有表面的总几何平均 RLU 为 249/100 cm²,84%(44 件中的 37 件)物品超过 100RLU 基准。在由临床工作人员清洁的 27 件物品中,有 24 件(89%)未达到基准。在没有清洁规范的 12 个部位中,有 11 个(92%)未达到基准。在 7 个“清洁”部位中,有 3 个(<100/100 cm² RLU)由家政人员清洁。与由 CSWs 清洁的表面相比,由家政人员清洁的表面的平均 log(10)RLU 低 64%(95%置信区间:35%,80%;P=0.019)。总之,无论物品是否有指定的清洁责任,临床设备表面经常显示出高水平的有机污垢。这些发现表明,可能需要审查临床设备的清洁实践,并对具有特定清洁责任的员工进行教育。

相似文献

1
Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?临床表面和设备的清洁审核:谁清洁什么?
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jul;78(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
2
Response to Anderson RE, Young V, Stewart M, Robertson C, Dancer SJ, 'Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?'.对安德森·R·E、杨·V、斯图尔特·M、罗伯逊·C、丹瑟·S·J所著《临床表面和设备清洁度审计:谁清洁什么?》的回应
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Dec;79(4):379-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
3
[Survey of methods of cleaning, decontamination, disinfection and sterilization in dental health services in tropical areas].[热带地区牙科保健服务中的清洁、去污、消毒和灭菌方法调查]
Sante. 1997 Sep-Oct;7(5):323-9.
4
Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.寻找监测医院清洁度的基准。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jan;77(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
5
A new sampling algorithm demonstrates that ultrasound equipment cleanliness can be improved.一种新的采样算法表明,超声设备的清洁度可以得到改善。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Aug;46(8):887-892. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
6
Is it really clean? An evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness.它真的干净吗?四种医院清洁度测定方法的效果评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2009 Jun;72(2):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of surface cleaning methods in intravitreal injection procedure rooms.评估玻璃体腔内注射操作室表面清洁方法的效果。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Use of audit and feedback with fluorescent targeting to achieve rapid improvements in room cleaning in the intensive care unit and ward settings.使用审核和反馈以及荧光定位来实现重症监护病房和病房环境中快速提高房间清洁度。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Apr;40(3):284-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
9
The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting.使用三磷酸腺苷生物发光来评估在重症监护环境中实施的改良清洁方案的效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Oct;38(8):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.02.011.
10
The adenosine triphosphate test is a rapid and reliable audit tool to assess manual cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels.腺苷三磷酸试验是一种快速可靠的审核工具,可用于评估软性内镜通道的手动清洗效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Mar;41(3):249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Using ATP measurements to rapidly evaluate the cleanliness of spectacle surfaces.使用三磷酸腺苷(ATP)测量法快速评估眼镜表面的清洁度。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 May 14;18(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07282-4.
2
Comparing contamination rates of sterile-covered and uncovered transducers for ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous lines.比较用于超声引导外周静脉通路的无菌覆盖与未覆盖探头的污染率。
Ultrasound J. 2024 Feb 7;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00347-0.
3
Assessment of Soiling on Highly Touched Clinical Surfaces in Intensive Care Units.
重症监护病房中高接触临床表面污染情况的评估
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023 Oct;31(3):188-193. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2023.23027.
4
Hygiene of Medical Devices and Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations for Alcohol-Based and QAC Disinfectants among Isolates from Physical Therapy Departments.医疗器械的卫生学和酒精基及 QAC 消毒剂对来自物理治疗科的分离物的最低抑菌浓度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214690.
5
Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.评价使用降低水温处理鼠笼。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;60(4):442-450. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000132. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
Implementation of human factors engineering approach to improve environmental cleaning and disinfection in a medical center.实施人为因素工程方法以改善医疗中心的环境清洁与消毒。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jan 16;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-0677-1. eCollection 2020.
7
Effect of thermal control of dry fomites on regulating the survival of human pathogenic bacteria responsible for nosocomial infections.干污染物热控制对调节医院感染相关人体病原菌存活的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 27;14(12):e0226952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226952. eCollection 2019.
8
Contamination detection by optical measurements in a real-life environment: A hospital case study.在现实环境中通过光学测量进行污染检测:一项医院案例研究。
J Biophotonics. 2020 Jan;13(1):e201960069. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201960069. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
Evaluation of the Sterility of Press'n Seal Cling Film for Use in Rodent Surgery.用于啮齿动物手术的Press'n Seal保鲜膜无菌性评估。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;58(2):235-239. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000096. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Concurrent Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Hospital Roommates.医院室友中细菌病原体的同时检测
Nurs Res. 2019 Jan/Feb;68(1):80-83. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000316.