• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.评价使用降低水温处理鼠笼。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;60(4):442-450. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000132. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Virucidal effects of rodent cage-cleaning practices on the viability of adenovirus vectors.啮齿动物笼具清洁措施对腺病毒载体活力的杀病毒作用
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2002 Sep;41(5):43-6.
3
Humidity and cage and bedding temperatures in unoccupied static mouse caging after steam sterilization.蒸汽灭菌后空置静态小鼠饲养笼中的湿度、笼温和垫料温度
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2009 Nov;48(6):774-9.
4
Comparison of Low- and High-temperature Cagewash Cycles for Sanitation of Rodent Housing Equipment in Research Facilities.低温和高温笼洗循环在研究设施中对啮齿动物饲养设备进行消毒的比较。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 1;62(1):48-54. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000088.
5
Assessing Elimination of Mouse Kidney Parvovirus from Cages by Mechanical Washing.评估机械清洗去除鼠肾细小病毒对鼠笼的影响。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;61(1):61-66. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000096. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
6
Mechanical Washing Prevents Transmission of Bacterial, Viral, and Protozoal Murine Pathogens from Cages.机械清洗可防止笼具传播细菌、病毒和原生动物鼠类病原体。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Mar 1;62(2):131-138. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000105. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Effect of Cage-Wash Temperature on the Removal of Infectious Agents from Caging and the Detection of Infectious Agents on the Filters of Animal Bedding-Disposal Cabinets by PCR Analysis.笼具清洗温度对从笼具中去除传染源以及通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析检测动物垫料处理柜过滤器上传染源的影响。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;54(6):745-55.
8
Validation of Sanitization Practices in Single-use Individually Ventilated Mouse Cages at Standard and Thermoneutral Temperatures.验证标准和热中性温度下一次性独立通风鼠笼的消毒实践。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Jul 1;61(4):353-360. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000036. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
9
Chemical contamination of animal feeding systems: evaluation of two caging systems and standard cage-washing equipment.动物饲养系统的化学污染:两种笼养系统及标准笼具清洗设备的评估
Lab Anim Sci. 1980 Dec;30(6):967-73.
10
Examining Intercage Transmission of : Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization.检查[具体内容]的笼间传播:屏障饲养和笼具消毒的影响 。 (注:原文中“Examining Intercage Transmission of :”这里“of”后面缺少具体所指内容)
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 7:2024.04.19.590256. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.19.590256.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Low- and High-temperature Cagewash Cycles for Sanitation of Rodent Housing Equipment in Research Facilities.低温和高温笼洗循环在研究设施中对啮齿动物饲养设备进行消毒的比较。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 1;62(1):48-54. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000088.

本文引用的文献

1
Quenching and Enhancement Effects of ATP Extractants, Cleansers, and Sanitizers on the Detection of the ATP Bioluminescence Signal .ATP提取剂、清洁剂和消毒剂对ATP生物发光信号检测的淬灭和增强作用
J Food Prot. 1997 Jul;60(7):799-803. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-60.7.799.
2
Evaluation of the Sterility of Press'n Seal Cling Film for Use in Rodent Surgery.用于啮齿动物手术的Press'n Seal保鲜膜无菌性评估。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;58(2):235-239. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000096. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Extending the Use of Disposable Caging Based on Results of Microbiologic Surface Testing.基于微生物表面检测结果扩展一次性笼具的使用
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2018 May 1;57(3):253-257.
4
Effect of Cage-Wash Temperature on the Removal of Infectious Agents from Caging and the Detection of Infectious Agents on the Filters of Animal Bedding-Disposal Cabinets by PCR Analysis.笼具清洗温度对从笼具中去除传染源以及通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析检测动物垫料处理柜过滤器上传染源的影响。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;54(6):745-55.
5
How reliable are ATP bioluminescence meters in assessing decontamination of environmental surfaces in healthcare settings?在医疗环境中,ATP生物发光仪评估环境表面去污效果的可靠性如何?
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099951. eCollection 2014.
6
Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing the cleanliness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature (1990-2012).使用 ATP 生物发光评估医院表面清洁度的研究:文献回顾(1990-2012 年)。
J Infect Public Health. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
7
Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?临床表面和设备的清洁审核:谁清洁什么?
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jul;78(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
8
Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.寻找监测医院清洁度的基准。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jan;77(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
9
Efficacy and limitations of an ATP-based monitoring system.基于三磷酸腺苷的监测系统的功效与局限性
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;49(2):190-5.
10
Do surface and cleaning chemistries interfere with ATP measurement systems for monitoring patient room hygiene?表面和清洁化学物质会干扰用于监测病房卫生状况的ATP测量系统吗?
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Feb;74(2):193-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.10.006. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

评价使用降低水温处理鼠笼。

Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.

机构信息

University Laboratory Animal Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;60(4):442-450. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000132. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

DOI:10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000132
PMID:34183092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8483641/
Abstract

Studies published in 1994 and 2000 established a temperature range of 143-180 °F for effective cage sanitization in animal facilities. These 2 studies were, respectively, theoretical and based on experiments using hot water to sanitize bacteria-coated test tubes. However, such experimental methods may not capture the practical advantages of modern washing technology or account for the routine use of detergent in cage wash. Moreover, these methods may not translate to the challenges of removing adhered debris and animal waste from the surfaces being sanitized. A sample of highly soiled cage bottoms, half of which were autoclaved with bedding to create challenging cleaning conditions, were processed at 6 combinations of wash and rinse cycles with 125 °F, 140 °F, and 180 °F water with detergent. All cycles were equipped with a data logging device to independently verify temperatures. After washing, cages underwent visual inspection and microbial sampling consisting of organic material detection using ATP detection and Replicate Organism Detection and Counting (RODAC) plates. Cages with any amount of visible debris failed inspection, as did cages that exceeded institutional sanitization thresholds. Results indicate that wash and rinse temperatures of 140 °F for a programmed wash duration of 450 s and rinse of 50 s effectively clean and disinfect both highly soiled and autoclaved cages. Accounting for both steam and electrical energy, these parameters result in an annual savings of $21,867.08 per washer on an equivalent run basis using the current institutional standard of 180 °F.

摘要

1994 年和 2000 年发表的研究确定了动物设施中有效笼具消毒的温度范围为 143-180°F。这两项研究分别是理论性的,基于使用热水对涂有细菌的试管进行消毒的实验。然而,这些实验方法可能无法捕捉到现代洗涤技术的实际优势,也无法解释笼具清洗中常规使用清洁剂的情况。此外,这些方法可能无法转化为去除正在消毒表面上附着的碎屑和动物废物的挑战。对高度污染的笼具底部进行了处理,其中一半与床上用品一起进行了高压灭菌,以创造具有挑战性的清洁条件,然后将这些样本在 125°F、140°F 和 180°F 的水与清洁剂的 6 种组合清洗和冲洗循环中进行处理。所有循环都配备了数据记录设备,以独立验证温度。清洗后,对笼子进行了目视检查和微生物采样,使用 ATP 检测和重复生物检测和计数(RODAC)板检测有机物质。任何可见碎屑的笼子都未通过检查,超过机构消毒阈值的笼子也未通过检查。结果表明,对于程序清洗持续时间为 450 秒且冲洗时间为 50 秒的 140°F 的清洗和冲洗温度,可有效清洁和消毒高度污染和高压灭菌的笼子。考虑到蒸汽和电能,这些参数在以当前机构标准的 180°F 为基础的等效运行基础上,每台洗衣机每年可节省 21,867.08 美元。