Suppr超能文献

评价使用降低水温处理鼠笼。

Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.

机构信息

University Laboratory Animal Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;60(4):442-450. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000132. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

Abstract

Studies published in 1994 and 2000 established a temperature range of 143-180 °F for effective cage sanitization in animal facilities. These 2 studies were, respectively, theoretical and based on experiments using hot water to sanitize bacteria-coated test tubes. However, such experimental methods may not capture the practical advantages of modern washing technology or account for the routine use of detergent in cage wash. Moreover, these methods may not translate to the challenges of removing adhered debris and animal waste from the surfaces being sanitized. A sample of highly soiled cage bottoms, half of which were autoclaved with bedding to create challenging cleaning conditions, were processed at 6 combinations of wash and rinse cycles with 125 °F, 140 °F, and 180 °F water with detergent. All cycles were equipped with a data logging device to independently verify temperatures. After washing, cages underwent visual inspection and microbial sampling consisting of organic material detection using ATP detection and Replicate Organism Detection and Counting (RODAC) plates. Cages with any amount of visible debris failed inspection, as did cages that exceeded institutional sanitization thresholds. Results indicate that wash and rinse temperatures of 140 °F for a programmed wash duration of 450 s and rinse of 50 s effectively clean and disinfect both highly soiled and autoclaved cages. Accounting for both steam and electrical energy, these parameters result in an annual savings of $21,867.08 per washer on an equivalent run basis using the current institutional standard of 180 °F.

摘要

1994 年和 2000 年发表的研究确定了动物设施中有效笼具消毒的温度范围为 143-180°F。这两项研究分别是理论性的,基于使用热水对涂有细菌的试管进行消毒的实验。然而,这些实验方法可能无法捕捉到现代洗涤技术的实际优势,也无法解释笼具清洗中常规使用清洁剂的情况。此外,这些方法可能无法转化为去除正在消毒表面上附着的碎屑和动物废物的挑战。对高度污染的笼具底部进行了处理,其中一半与床上用品一起进行了高压灭菌,以创造具有挑战性的清洁条件,然后将这些样本在 125°F、140°F 和 180°F 的水与清洁剂的 6 种组合清洗和冲洗循环中进行处理。所有循环都配备了数据记录设备,以独立验证温度。清洗后,对笼子进行了目视检查和微生物采样,使用 ATP 检测和重复生物检测和计数(RODAC)板检测有机物质。任何可见碎屑的笼子都未通过检查,超过机构消毒阈值的笼子也未通过检查。结果表明,对于程序清洗持续时间为 450 秒且冲洗时间为 50 秒的 140°F 的清洗和冲洗温度,可有效清洁和消毒高度污染和高压灭菌的笼子。考虑到蒸汽和电能,这些参数在以当前机构标准的 180°F 为基础的等效运行基础上,每台洗衣机每年可节省 21,867.08 美元。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.评价使用降低水温处理鼠笼。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;60(4):442-450. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000132. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
5
Assessing Elimination of Mouse Kidney Parvovirus from Cages by Mechanical Washing.评估机械清洗去除鼠肾细小病毒对鼠笼的影响。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;61(1):61-66. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000096. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluation of the Sterility of Press'n Seal Cling Film for Use in Rodent Surgery.用于啮齿动物手术的Press'n Seal保鲜膜无菌性评估。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;58(2):235-239. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000096. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
7
Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?临床表面和设备的清洁审核:谁清洁什么?
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jul;78(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
8
Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.寻找监测医院清洁度的基准。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jan;77(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验