Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Sep;60(Pt 9):1281-1286. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.027805-0. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
This study provides guidelines on the usefulness of full and 527 bp 16S rRNA gene sequencing and Microseq databases for identifying medically important aerobic Gram-negative bacteria. Overall, full and 527 bp 16S rRNA gene sequencing can identify 26.1 % and 32.6 %, respectively, of medically important aerobic Gram-negative bacteria confidently to the species level, whereas the full-MicroSeq and 500-MicroSeq databases can identify 15.2 % and 26.1 %, respectively, of medically important aerobic Gram-negative bacteria confidently to the species level. Among the major groups of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, the methods and databases are least useful for identification of Aeromonas, Bordetella and Bartonella species. None of the Aeromonas species can be confidently or doubtfully identified, whereas only 0 % and 0-33.3 % of Bordetella species and 0-10 % and 0-10 % of Bartonella species can be confidently and doubtfully identified, respectively. On the other hand, these methods and databases are most useful for identification of members of the families Pasteurellaceae and Legionellaceae and Campylobacter species: 29.6-59.3 % and 7.4-18.5 % of members of Pasteurellaceae, 36-52 % and 12-24 % of members of Legionellaceae, and 26.7-60 % and 0-13.3 % of Campylobacter species can be confidently and doubtfully identified, respectively. Thirty-nine medically important aerobic Gram-negative bacteria that should be confidently identified by full 16S rRNA gene sequencing are not included in the full-MicroSeq database. Twenty-three medically important aerobic Gram-negative bacteria that should be confidently identified by 527 bp 16S rRNA gene sequencing are not included in the 500-MicroSeq database. Compared with results of our previous studies on anaerobic and Gram-positive bacteria, full and 527 bp 16S rRNA gene sequencing are able to confidently identify significantly more anaerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria than aerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
本研究提供了关于全长度和 527bp 16S rRNA 基因测序以及 Microseq 数据库在鉴定医学上重要的需氧革兰氏阴性菌中的作用的指南。总的来说,全长度和 527bp 16S rRNA 基因测序分别可以有把握地将 26.1%和 32.6%的医学上重要的需氧革兰氏阴性菌鉴定到种水平,而全长度-MicroSeq 和 500-MicroSeq 数据库分别可以有把握地将 15.2%和 26.1%的医学上重要的需氧革兰氏阴性菌鉴定到种水平。在需氧革兰氏阴性菌的主要菌属中,这些方法和数据库对气单胞菌属、博德特菌属和巴尔通体属的鉴定最没有用。没有一种气单胞菌属可以被有把握地或有疑问地鉴定,而只有 0%和 0-33.3%的博德特菌属和 0-10%和 0-10%的巴尔通体属可以被有把握地和有疑问地鉴定。另一方面,这些方法和数据库对巴斯德菌科和军团菌科以及弯曲菌属成员的鉴定最有用:巴斯德菌科的 29.6-59.3%和 7.4-18.5%,军团菌科的 36-52%和 12-24%,以及弯曲菌属的 26.7-60%和 0-13.3%可以被有把握地和有疑问地鉴定。有 39 种医学上重要的需氧革兰氏阴性菌应该通过全长度 16S rRNA 基因测序有把握地鉴定,但它们未包含在全长度-MicroSeq 数据库中。有 23 种医学上重要的需氧革兰氏阴性菌应该通过 527bp 16S rRNA 基因测序有把握地鉴定,但它们未包含在 500-MicroSeq 数据库中。与我们之前关于厌氧菌和革兰氏阳性菌的研究结果相比,全长度和 527bp 16S rRNA 基因测序能够有把握地鉴定出比需氧革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌更多的厌氧菌和革兰氏阳性菌。