Suppr超能文献

回忆中累积线索与递减线索的益处。

Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.

作者信息

Finley Jason R, Benjamin Aaron S, Hays Matthew J, Bjork Robert A, Kornell Nate

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2011 May 1;64(4):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.006.

Abstract

Optimizing learning over multiple retrieval opportunities requires a joint consideration of both the probability and the mnemonic value of a successful retrieval. Previous research has addressed this trade-off by manipulating the schedule of practice trials, suggesting that a pattern of increasingly long lags-"expanding retrieval practice"-may keep retrievals successful while gradually increasing their mnemonic value (Landauer & Bjork, 1978). Here we explore the trade-off issue further using an analogous manipulation of cue informativeness. After being given an initial presentation of English-Iñupiaq word pairs, participants received practice trials across which letters of the target word were either accumulated (AC), diminished (DC), or always fully present. Diminishing cues yielded the highest performance on a final test of cued recall. Additional analyses suggest that AC practice promotes potent (effortful) retrieval at the cost of success, and DC practice promotes successful retrieval at the cost of potency. Experiment 2 revealed that the negative effects of AC practice can be partly ameliorated by providing feedback after each practice trial.

摘要

在多个检索机会上优化学习需要同时考虑成功检索的概率和记忆价值。先前的研究通过操纵练习试验的安排来解决这种权衡问题,表明一种越来越长的滞后模式——“扩展检索练习”——可能会使检索保持成功,同时逐渐增加其记忆价值(兰道尔和比约克,1978)。在这里,我们使用线索信息量的类似操纵来进一步探讨权衡问题。在最初呈现英语-因纽特语单词对后,参与者接受练习试验,在这些试验中,目标单词的字母要么累积(AC)、减少(DC),要么始终完全呈现。减少线索在最终的线索回忆测试中产生了最高的表现。进一步的分析表明,AC练习以成功为代价促进有力(费力)的检索,而DC练习以有力为代价促进成功的检索。实验2表明,通过在每次练习试验后提供反馈,可以部分减轻AC练习的负面影响。

相似文献

1
Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.
J Mem Lang. 2011 May 1;64(4):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.006.
2
Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1666-1674. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01617-6.
3
Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1239-45. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0434-z.
4
Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):704-19. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704.
6
The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
Neurosci Lett. 2023 Feb 16;797:137066. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137066. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1868-1876. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1366-9.
8
Confidence in accuracy moderates the benefits of retrieval practice.
Memory. 2019 Apr;27(4):548-554. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1529796. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
9
Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Apr 20;17:1100497. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1100497. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the dual-memory framework: individual differences in the magnitude of the retrieval practice effect and fluid intelligence.
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01228-7. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Comparing models of learning and relearning in large-scale cognitive training data sets.
NPJ Sci Learn. 2022 Oct 4;7(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00142-x.
3
Enhancing learning and retention through the distribution of practice repetitions across multiple sessions.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):455-472. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01361-8. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Testing improves performance as well as assesses learning: A review of the testing effect with implications for models of learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(3):222-241. doi: 10.1037/xan0000323. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1666-1674. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01617-6.
7
Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1868-1876. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1366-9.
8
A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):847-869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1298-4.
9
Reduction in Prosodic Prominence Predicts Speakers' Recall: Implications for Theories of Prosody.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May 28;30(5):606-619. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.966122. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
10
Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1239-45. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0434-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
2
Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall.
Mem Cognit. 1973 Sep;1(3):213-6. doi: 10.3758/BF03198098.
4
Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):116-24. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.116.
5
The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Sep;15(3):243-57. doi: 10.1037/a0016496.
6
Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):989-98. doi: 10.1037/a0015729.
7
Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1095-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x.
8
Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Jun;14(2):101-17. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.101.
9
Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):704-19. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704.
10
Mediation analysis.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593-614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验