• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门顺行灌肠术患者的长期随访。

Long-term follow-up of patients after antegrade continence enema procedure.

机构信息

Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts 02155, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 May;52(5):574-80. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181ff6042.

DOI:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181ff6042
PMID:21502828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3877620/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antegrade continence enema (ACE) has become an important therapeutic modality in the treatment of intractable constipation and fecal incontinence. There are little data available on the long-term performance of the ACE procedure in children.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent the ACE procedure was conducted. Irrigation characteristics and complications were noted. Outcome was assessed for individual encounters based on frequency of bowel movements, incontinence, pain, and predictability.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients underwent an ACE. One hundred five patients had at least 6 months of follow-up, and were included in the analysis. Diagnoses included myelodysplasia (39%), functional intractable constipation (26%), anorectal malformations (21%), nonrelaxing internal anal sphincter (7%), cerebral palsy (3%), and other diagnoses (4%). The average follow-up was 68 months (range 7-178 months). At the last follow-up, 69% of patients had successful bowel management. Of the 31% of patients who did not have successful bowel management, 20% were using the ACE despite suboptimal results, 10% required surgical removal, and 2% were not using the ACE because of behavioral opposition to it. Patients were started on normal saline, but were switched to GoLYTELY (PEG-3350 and electrolyte solution) if there was an inadequate response (61% at final encounter). Additives were needed in 34% of patients. The average irrigation dose was 23 ± 0.7 mL/kg. The average toilet sitting time was 51.7 ± 3.5 minutes, with infusions running for 12.1 ± 1.2 minutes. Stomal complications occurred in 63% (infection, leakage, and stenosis) of patients, 33% required surgical revision and 6% eventually required diverting ostomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term use of the ACE gives successful results in 69% of patients, whereas 63% had a stoma-related complication and 33% required surgical revision of the stoma.

摘要

背景

顺行性灌肠(ACE)已成为治疗顽固性便秘和粪便失禁的重要治疗方法。关于 ACE 手术在儿童中的长期效果的数据很少。

方法

对接受 ACE 手术的患者进行回顾性分析。记录冲洗特点和并发症。根据排便频率、失禁、疼痛和可预测性,对每次就诊的结果进行评估。

结果

117 例患者接受 ACE 治疗。105 例患者至少随访 6 个月,纳入分析。诊断包括脊髓发育不良(39%)、功能性难治性便秘(26%)、肛门直肠畸形(21%)、非松弛性内括约肌(7%)、脑瘫(3%)和其他诊断(4%)。平均随访时间为 68 个月(7-178 个月)。最后一次随访时,69%的患者排便管理成功。在 31%的排便管理不成功的患者中,20%的患者尽管结果不理想仍在使用 ACE,10%的患者需要手术切除,2%的患者因对 ACE 行为上的反对而未使用 ACE。患者开始使用生理盐水,但如果反应不足(最后一次就诊时 61%)则改用 GoLYTELY(PEG-3350 和电解质溶液)。34%的患者需要添加物。平均冲洗剂量为 23 ± 0.7 mL/kg。平均坐便时间为 51.7 ± 3.5 分钟,输注时间为 12.1 ± 1.2 分钟。63%(感染、渗漏和狭窄)的患者出现造口并发症,33%需要手术修正,6%最终需要改道造口。

结论

长期使用 ACE 可使 69%的患者获得成功的结果,而 63%的患者出现造口相关并发症,33%的患者需要对造口进行手术修正。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up of patients after antegrade continence enema procedure.经肛门顺行灌肠术患者的长期随访。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 May;52(5):574-80. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181ff6042.
2
Appendicostomy stomas and antegrade colonic irrigation after laparoscopic antegrade continence enema.腹腔镜顺行性节制灌肠术后的阑尾造口术造口及顺行性结肠灌洗
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Aug;16(4):400-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.400.
3
Long-term results for Malone antegrade continence enema for adults with neurogenic bowel disease.马龙顺行性节制灌肠术治疗成人神经源性肠病的长期疗效。
Urology. 2003 Mar;61(3):502-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02282-3.
4
Is the outcome of the left colon antegrade continence enema better than that of the right colon antegrade continence enema?左半结肠顺行性节制灌肠的效果是否优于右半结肠顺行性节制灌肠?
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Apr;44(4):783-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.034.
5
Contemporary short- and long-term outcomes in patients with unremitting constipation and fecal incontinence treated with an antegrade continence enema.经顺行性节制灌肠治疗的顽固性便秘和大便失禁患者的当代短期和长期疗效
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jan;52(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
Long-term results of antegrade colonic enema in adult patients: assessment of functional results.成人患者顺行结肠灌肠的长期结果:功能结果评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Oct;51(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9401-6. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
7
Effectiveness of the antegrade colonic enema stopper at preventing stomal stenosis: long-term follow-up.顺行结肠灌肠塞预防造口狭窄的有效性:长期随访
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Feb;22(1):26-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285874. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
8
Use of Antegrade Continence Enema for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Functional Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review.顺行性节制灌肠法治疗成人大便失禁和功能性便秘的系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Oct;58(10):999-1013. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000428.
9
Ileal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic enema (ACE) in the treatment of fecal incontinence and chronic constipation: a systematic review.回肠新阑尾造口术在治疗粪便失禁和慢性便秘中的应用:系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;25(8):915-921. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02434-7. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
10
The Malone antegrade continence enema: single institutional review.马龙顺行性节制灌肠术:单机构回顾
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.062. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatments for intractable constipation in childhood.儿童难治性便秘的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 19;6(6):CD014580. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014580.pub2.
2
The urologist's role in bowel management of adult spina bifida: a narrative review.泌尿科医生在成人脊柱裂肠道管理中的作用:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):116-126. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-389. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
3
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
4
Is an Antireflux Procedure Necessary for a Successful Appendicostomy? The Simplified Malone Antegrade Continence Enema Procedure.成功的阑尾造口术是否需要抗反流手术?简化的马龙顺行性节制灌肠术。
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;28(4):288-292. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_40_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Does the Oral-Anal Transit Test Correlate with Colonic Manometry Findings in Children with Refractory Constipation?口服-肛门转运试验与难治性便秘儿童的结肠测压结果相关吗?
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2020 Mar;23(2):137-145. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2020.23.2.137. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
6
Comparison of antegrade continence enema treatment and sacral nerve stimulation for children with severe functional constipation and fecal incontinence.对比经肛门持续灌洗和骶神经刺激治疗儿童严重功能性便秘伴大便失禁的疗效。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Aug;32(8):e13809. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13809. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?马龙顺行性节制灌肠术与盲肠造口术与经肛门冲洗法——有哪些新进展以及我们如何向患者提供咨询?
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jun 10;20(8):41. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0909-1.
8
Refractory functional constipation: clinical management or appendicostomy?难治性功能性便秘:临床管理还是阑尾造口术?
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 Mar-Apr;96(2):210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Unmet Needs in Pediatric Functional Constipation.小儿功能性便秘的未满足需求
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018 Nov;57(13):1489-1495. doi: 10.1177/0009922818774343. Epub 2018 May 10.
10
Colonic transit time and pressure based on Bernoulli's principle.基于伯努利原理的结肠运输时间和压力。
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 5;11:153-163. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S153676. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
After the honeymoon comes divorce: long-term use of the antegrade continence enema procedure.蜜月期过后便是离婚:顺行性节制灌肠术的长期应用。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jun;44(6):1274-6; discussion 1276-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.030.
2
Update on pediatric faecal incontinence.小儿大便失禁的最新情况。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;19(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039190. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
3
Cecostomy button for antegrade enemas: survey of 29 patients.用于顺行灌肠的盲肠造口纽扣:29例患者的调查
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Oct;43(10):1853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.03.043.
4
Tap water irrigation and additives to optimize success with the Malone antegrade continence enema: the Indiana University algorithm.自来水冲洗及添加物以优化马龙顺行性可控灌肠术的成功率:印第安纳大学算法
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1757-60; discussion 1760. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.074. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
5
The Malone antegrade continence enema: single institutional review.马龙顺行性节制灌肠术:单机构回顾
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.062. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
6
Antegrade continence enema in the treatment of congenital fecal incontinence beyond childhood.顺行性可控灌肠术治疗儿童期以后的先天性大便失禁。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1605-10. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9327-z. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
7
Long-term results of antegrade colonic enema in adult patients: assessment of functional results.成人患者顺行结肠灌肠的长期结果:功能结果评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Oct;51(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9401-6. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
8
Antegrade continence enema (ACE): current practice.顺行性可控灌肠术(ACE):当前实践
Pediatr Surg Int. 2008 Jun;24(6):685-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2130-z. Epub 2008 Apr 12.
9
Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) for fecal incontinence in imperforate anus improves quality of life.用于肛门闭锁所致大便失禁的马龙顺行性节制灌肠术(MACE)可改善生活质量。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Dec;23(12):1175-7. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-2026-3.
10
Using saline solutions for ACE washouts.使用盐溶液进行ACE冲洗。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Feb;93(2):149-50. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.123489. Epub 2007 Sep 19.