• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化降压对糖尿病患者心肌梗死和卒中的影响:73913 例患者的荟萃分析。

Effects of intensive blood pressure reduction on myocardial infarction and stroke in diabetes: a meta-analysis in 73,913 patients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2011 Jul;29(7):1253-69. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283469976.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283469976
PMID:21505352
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines generally recommend intensive lowering of blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2 diabetes. There is uncertainty about the impact of this strategy on case-specific events. Thus, we generated estimates of the effects of BP reduction on the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in diabetic patients.

METHODS

We selected studies which compared different BP-lowering agents and different BP intervention strategies in patients with diabetes. Outcome measures were MI and stroke. We abstracted information about study design, intervention, population, outcomes, and methodological quality for a total of 73,913 patients with diabetes (295,652 patient-years of exposure) randomized in 31 intervention trials.

RESULTS

Overall, experimental treatment reduced the risk of stroke by 9% (P = 0.0059), and that of MI by 11% (P = 0.0015). Allocation to more-tight, compared with less-tight, BP control reduced the risk of stroke by 31% [relative risk (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.79], whereas the reduction in the risk of MI approached, but did not achieve, significance [odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.02]. In a meta-regression analysis, the risk of stroke decreased by 13% (95% CI 5-20, P = 0.002) for each 5-mmHg reduction in SBP, and by 11.5% (95% CI 5-17, P < 0.001) for each 2-mmHg reduction in DBP. In contrast, the risk of MI did not show any association with the extent of BP reduction (SBP: P = 0.793; DBP: P = 0.832).

CONCLUSION

In patients with diabetes, protection from stroke increases with the magnitude of BP reduction. We were unable to detect such a relation for MI.

摘要

目的

指南通常建议 2 型糖尿病患者积极降低血压(BP)。但对于该策略对具体病例事件的影响尚存在不确定性。因此,我们评估了降低 BP 对糖尿病患者心肌梗死(MI)和卒中风险的影响。

方法

我们选择了比较不同降压药物和不同降压干预策略在糖尿病患者中的研究。主要终点为 MI 和卒中。我们提取了研究设计、干预、人群、结局和方法学质量等信息,共有 31 项干预试验的 73913 例糖尿病患者(295652 人年的暴露)被随机分组。

结果

总体而言,实验组卒中风险降低 9%(P=0.0059),MI 风险降低 11%(P=0.0015)。与血压控制较松相比,更严格的血压控制降低卒中风险 31%[相对风险(RR)0.61,95%置信区间(CI)0.48-0.79],而 MI 风险的降低则接近但未达到统计学意义[比值比(OR)0.87,95%CI 0.74-1.02]。在一项 meta 回归分析中,SBP 每降低 5mmHg,卒中风险降低 13%(95%CI 5-20,P=0.002),DBP 每降低 2mmHg,卒中风险降低 11.5%(95%CI 5-17,P<0.001)。相比之下,MI 风险与 BP 降低程度无相关性(SBP:P=0.793;DBP:P=0.832)。

结论

在糖尿病患者中,降低 BP 幅度越大,对卒中的保护作用越强。而对于 MI 我们未发现这种相关性。

相似文献

1
Effects of intensive blood pressure reduction on myocardial infarction and stroke in diabetes: a meta-analysis in 73,913 patients.强化降压对糖尿病患者心肌梗死和卒中的影响:73913 例患者的荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2011 Jul;29(7):1253-69. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283469976.
2
Blood pressure targets in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose: observations from traditional and bayesian random-effects meta-analyses of randomized trials.2 型糖尿病/空腹血糖受损患者的血压目标:来自传统和贝叶斯随机效应荟萃分析的观察结果。
Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2799-810, 9 p following 810. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.016337. Epub 2011 May 31.
3
Smoking as an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction or stroke in type 2 diabetes: a report from the Swedish National Diabetes Register.吸烟作为2型糖尿病患者发生心肌梗死或中风的独立危险因素:来自瑞典国家糖尿病登记处的报告。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Aug;16(4):506-12. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832ccc50.
4
Pulse pressure and risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease: an INternational VErapamil SR-trandolapril STudy (INVEST) analysis.高血压合并冠状动脉疾病患者的脉压与心血管事件风险:一项国际维拉帕米缓释片 - 群多普利研究(INVEST)分析
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(11):1395-401. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp109. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
The Hypertension Optimal Treatment study and the importance of lowering blood pressure.高血压最佳治疗研究及降低血压的重要性。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1999 Feb;17(1):S9-13.
6
Effects of antihypertensive treatment in Asian populations: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled studies (CARdiovascular protectioN group in Asia: CARNA).抗高血压治疗对亚洲人群的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究的荟萃分析(亚洲心血管保护组:CARNA)
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Feb;8(2):103-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
7
Stroke and coronary heart disease in treated hypertension -- a prospective cohort study over three decades.经治疗的高血压患者中的中风和冠心病——一项长达三十年的前瞻性队列研究
J Intern Med. 2005 Jun;257(6):496-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01497.x.
8
Impact of blood pressure control on cardiovascular events in 26,512 Japanese hypertensive patients: the Japan Hypertension Evaluation with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Therapy (J-HEALTH) study, a prospective nationwide observational study.血压控制对26512名日本高血压患者心血管事件的影响:日本血管紧张素II拮抗剂氯沙坦治疗高血压评估(J-HEALTH)研究,一项全国性前瞻性观察研究。
Hypertens Res. 2008 Mar;31(3):469-78. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.469.
9
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
10
Reduced total mortality and death from myocardial infarction and stroke in moderate/severe hypertensives treated with "Tenormin" (atenolol).使用“Tenormin”(阿替洛尔)治疗的中重度高血压患者的总死亡率以及心肌梗死和中风所致死亡率降低。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1990;16(3):133-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline on Diabetic Kidney Disease-2025 Update.亚太肾脏病学会糖尿病肾病临床实践指南 - 2025年更新版
Nephrology (Carlton). 2025 Jul;30 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):3-56. doi: 10.1111/nep.70030.
2
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2025年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S207-S238. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S010.
3
Does dance therapy benefit the improvement of blood pressure and blood lipid in patients with hypertension? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
舞蹈疗法对高血压患者的血压和血脂改善有益吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 24;11:1421124. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1421124. eCollection 2024.
4
Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Technology for Patients With Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure Discharged From the Emergency Department: Pilot Study.急诊科出院的无症状血压升高患者的家庭血压远程监测技术:初步研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 30;8:e49592. doi: 10.2196/49592.
5
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2024年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S179-S218. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S010.
6
Enhancing Chronic-Disease Education through Integrated Medical and Social Care: Exploring the Beneficial Role of a Community Teaching Kitchen in Oregon.通过整合医疗和社会关怀来加强慢性病教育:探索俄勒冈州社区教学厨房的有益作用。
Nutrients. 2023 Oct 14;15(20):4368. doi: 10.3390/nu15204368.
7
The effects of extra virgin olive oil or butter on cardiovascular biomarkers in European and Chinese males in the UK: A pilot randomised crossover trial.特级初榨橄榄油或黄油对在英国的欧洲和中国男性心血管生物标志物的影响:一项初步随机交叉试验。
Nutr Health. 2025 Jun;31(2):485-498. doi: 10.1177/02601060231187516. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
8
Effectiveness of integrated chronic care models for cardiometabolic multimorbidity in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区针对心脏代谢性多重慢病的综合慢性照护模式的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 27;13(6):e073652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073652.
9
Low-carbohydrate diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (LoCaT): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.低碳水化合物饮食治疗 2 型糖尿病(LoCaT):一项多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 19;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07427-5.
10
Effects of inspiratory muscle training in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis.吸气肌训练对高血压患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 23;10:1113509. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1113509. eCollection 2023.