Yano Yuichiro, Briasoulis Alexandros, Bakris George L, Hoshide Satoshi, Wang Ji-Guang, Shimada Kazuyuki, Kario Kazuomi
American Society of Hypertension Comprehensive Hypertension Center, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Japan.
American Society of Hypertension Comprehensive Hypertension Center, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, USA.
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Feb;8(2):103-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
To examine the effects of antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Asian populations, we systematically evaluated prospective randomized studies carried out in Asia (1991-2013). We identified 18 trials with 23,215 and 21,986 hypertensive patients in the intervention (ie, strict blood pressure [BP] lowering or add-on treatment) and reference groups, respectively (mean age, 65 years; follow-up duration, 3.2 years). Analysis was performed through 1) first subgroup: eight trials that compared active antihypertensive treatment with placebo or intensive with less intensive BP control and 2) second subgroup: 10 trials that compared different antihypertensive treatments. In the first subgroup analysis, BP was reduced from 160.3/87.3 mm Hg to 140.2/78.4 mm Hg in the intervention group with a -6.7/-2.2 mm Hg (P < .001) greater BP reduction than the reference group. Compared with the reference group, the intervention group had a lower risk of composite CVD events (odd ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.81), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-1.0), stroke (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80), and CVD mortality (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.97; all P ≤ .05). In the second subgroup analysis, no difference was found for any outcome between renin-angiotensin blockers and calcium-channel blockers or diuretics. The meta-regression line among the 18 trials indicated that a 10 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP was associated with a reduced risk for composite CVD events (-39.5%) and stroke (-30.0%). Our meta-analysis shows a benefit when a BP target of less than 140/80 mm Hg is achieved in Asian hypertensives. BP reduction itself, regardless of BP lowering agents, is important for achieving CVD risk reduction.
为研究抗高血压治疗对亚洲人群心血管疾病(CVD)的影响,我们系统评估了1991年至2013年在亚洲开展的前瞻性随机研究。我们确定了18项试验,干预组(即严格降低血压[BP]或联合治疗)和参照组分别有23215例和21986例高血压患者(平均年龄65岁;随访时间3.2年)。分析通过1)第一个亚组进行:8项将积极抗高血压治疗与安慰剂比较或强化与非强化血压控制比较的试验,以及2)第二个亚组进行:10项比较不同抗高血压治疗的试验。在第一个亚组分析中,干预组血压从160.3/87.3 mmHg降至140.2/78.4 mmHg,收缩压和舒张压较参照组分别多降低-6.7/-2.2 mmHg(P <.001)。与参照组相比,干预组发生复合CVD事件的风险较低(比值比[OR],0.73;95%置信区间[CI],0.66 - 0.81),心肌梗死(OR,0.79;95% CI,0.63 - 1.0)、中风(OR,0.71;95% CI,0.63 - 0.80)和CVD死亡率(OR,0.81;95% CI,0.68 - 0.97;均P≤.05)。在第二个亚组分析中,肾素 - 血管紧张素阻滞剂与钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂之间在任何结局方面均未发现差异。18项试验的Meta回归直线表明,收缩压降低10 mmHg与复合CVD事件风险降低(-39.5%)和中风风险降低(-30.0%)相关。我们的Meta分析表明,亚洲高血压患者实现血压目标低于140/80 mmHg有益。无论使用何种降压药物,降低血压本身对于降低CVD风险都很重要。