Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, New York University School of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2799-810, 9 p following 810. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.016337. Epub 2011 May 31.
Most guidelines for treatment of hypertension recommend a blood pressure (BP) goal of <140/90 mm Hg, and a more aggressive goal of <130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus. However, in the recent Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, a lower BP was not beneficial. The optimal BP target in subjects with diabetes mellitus or those with impaired fasting glucose/glucose tolerance is therefore not well defined.
We performed PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL searches for randomized clinical trials from 1965 through October 2010 of antihypertensive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance that enrolled at least 100 patients with achieved systolic BP of ≤ 135 mm Hg in the intensive BP control group and ≤ 140 mm Hg in the standard BP control group, had a follow-up of at least 1 year, and evaluated macrovascular or microvascular events. We identified 13 randomized clinical trials enrolling 37 736 participants. Intensive BP control was associated with a 10% reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.98), a 17% reduction in stroke, and a 20% increase in serious adverse effects, but with similar outcomes for other macrovascular and microvascular (cardiac, renal, and retinal) events compared with standard BP control. The results were similar in a sensitivity analysis using a bayesian random-effects model. More intensive BP control (≤ 130 mm Hg) was associated with a greater reduction in stroke, but did not reduce other events. Meta-regression analysis showed continued risk reduction for stroke to a systolic BP of <120 mm Hg. However, at levels <130 mm Hg, there was a 40% increase in serious adverse events with no benefit for other outcomes.
The present body of evidence suggests that in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance, a systolic BP treatment goal of 130 to 135 mm Hg is acceptable. However, with more aggressive goals (<130 mm Hg), we observed target organ heterogeneity in that the risk of stroke continued to fall, but there was no benefit regarding the risk of other macrovascular or microvascular (cardiac, renal and retinal) events, and the risk of serious adverse events even increased.
大多数高血压治疗指南建议血压(BP)目标<140/90mmHg,对于糖尿病患者则建议更积极的目标<130/80mmHg。然而,在最近的“行动控制心血管风险糖尿病”(ACCORD)试验中,较低的血压并没有带来益处。因此,糖尿病患者或空腹血糖受损/葡萄糖耐量受损患者的最佳血压目标尚不清楚。
我们对 1965 年至 2010 年 10 月期间在接受降压治疗的 2 型糖尿病或空腹血糖受损/葡萄糖耐量受损患者中进行了 PUBMED、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 随机临床试验搜索,这些患者的收缩压在强化降压组中达到≤135mmHg,在标准降压组中达到≤140mmHg,随访至少 1 年,并评估大血管或微血管事件。我们确定了 13 项纳入 37736 名参与者的随机临床试验。强化血压控制使全因死亡率降低 10%(比值比,0.90;95%置信区间,0.83 至 0.98),卒中降低 17%,严重不良事件增加 20%,但与标准血压控制相比,其他大血管和微血管(心脏、肾脏和视网膜)事件的结果相似。使用贝叶斯随机效应模型进行敏感性分析的结果相似。更严格的血压控制(≤130mmHg)与卒中的进一步降低相关,但没有降低其他事件的风险。Meta 回归分析显示,收缩压<120mmHg 仍可继续降低卒中风险。然而,在<130mmHg 的水平,严重不良事件的发生率增加了 40%,但其他结果没有获益。
目前的证据表明,对于 2 型糖尿病/空腹血糖受损/葡萄糖耐量受损患者,收缩压治疗目标为 130-135mmHg 是可以接受的。然而,在更积极的目标(<130mmHg)下,我们观察到目标器官的异质性,即卒中的风险继续下降,但其他大血管或微血管(心脏、肾脏和视网膜)事件的风险没有获益,严重不良事件的风险甚至增加。