• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类对异性父母面部特征的性印记。

Sexual imprinting on facial traits of opposite-sex parents in humans.

作者信息

Marcinkowska Urszula M, Rantala Markus J

机构信息

University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2012 Sep 5;10(3):621-30. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000318.

DOI:10.1177/147470491201000318
PMID:22947684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480955/
Abstract

Positive sexual imprinting is a process by which individuals use the phenotype of their opposite-sex parent as a template for acquiring mates. Recent studies in humans have concluded that an imprinting-like mechanism influences human mate choice in facial traits. However, some of the previous studies have had methodological problems or flaws which might have invalidated or led to an overgeneralization of the original interpretation of their results. In this study, 70 heterosexual adults were used to test if their partners resembled facially their opposite-sex parent as the sexual imprinting hypothesis predicts. Judges assessed the subjective facial similarity between each participant's partner and their parent. We found that there was no perceived facial similarity between women's partners and their fathers. However, men tended to pair more often with women that were perceived as resembling the men's own mothers. In contrast to previous studies, the quality of the relationship between participants and their parents did not predict the level of facial resemblance between the participant's spouse and their parent.

摘要

正向性印记是一个过程,个体以此过程将其异性父母的表型作为寻找配偶的模板。近期针对人类的研究得出结论,一种类似印记的机制会影响人类对面部特征的配偶选择。然而,之前的一些研究存在方法学问题或缺陷,这些问题可能致使其结果的原始解释无效或导致过度概括。在本研究中,70名异性恋成年人被用于测试他们的伴侣在面部特征上是否如性印记假说所预测的那样与其异性父母相似。评判者评估了每位参与者的伴侣与其父母之间的主观面部相似性。我们发现,女性的伴侣与其父亲之间不存在可察觉到的面部相似性。然而,男性倾向于更多地与被认为与自己母亲相似的女性配对。与之前的研究不同,参与者与其父母之间关系的质量并不能预测参与者配偶与其父母之间面部相似的程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d490/10480955/16a875865a36/10.1177_147470491201000318-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d490/10480955/16a875865a36/10.1177_147470491201000318-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d490/10480955/16a875865a36/10.1177_147470491201000318-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Sexual imprinting on facial traits of opposite-sex parents in humans.人类对异性父母面部特征的性印记。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Sep 5;10(3):621-30. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000318.
2
Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.面部特征相似性介导配偶选择:对异性父母的性印记。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 7;276(1654):91-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1021.
3
Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.男性的,而不是女性的,社会性别取向预测了伴侣对自身性别面孔的性二态线索的感知。
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Jul;43(5):965-71. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0202-1. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
4
Self-reported sexual desire in homosexual men and women predicts preferences for sexually dimorphic facial cues.男同性恋者和女同性恋者的自我报告的性欲望预测了他们对面部二态性线索的偏好。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jul;42(5):785-91. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0059-8. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
5
Human homogamy in facial characteristics: does a sexual-imprinting-like mechanism play a role?人类面部特征的同型婚配:性印记样机制是否发挥作用?
Hum Nat. 2012 Sep;23(3):323-40. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9146-8.
6
Sexual imprinting in human mate choice.人类配偶选择中的性印记
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 7;271(1544):1129-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2672.
7
More than re-establishing the partner relationship: Intimate aftercare for Somali parents in diaspora.超越重建伙伴关系:离散状态下的索马里父母亲密的产后护理。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):863-70. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
8
Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating.人类配偶选择的变异:同时调查遗传力、父母影响、性印记和选择性交配。
Am Nat. 2011 May;177(5):605-16. doi: 10.1086/659629.
9
Sex differences in relationship regret: the role of perceived mate characteristics.关系遗憾中的性别差异:感知到的伴侣特征的作用。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Jul 17;10(3):422-42. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000304.
10
Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.社会性行为态度和二元性欲望独立预测女性对男性嗓音阳刚特质的偏好。
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Oct;43(7):1343-53. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0298-y. Epub 2014 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
No Evidence that People Born to Older Parents Show Weaker Preferences for Younger Adult Faces.没有证据表明父母年龄较大的人对年轻成年人面孔的偏好较弱。
Adapt Human Behav Physiol. 2025;11(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s40750-025-00263-8. Epub 2025 May 20.
2
Consistency of Eye Coloration Across Different Relationship Partners.不同关系伴侣间眼睛颜色的一致性。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Jan;52(1):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02450-0. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?我们为什么会选择相似的伴侣,还是说我们会这样做?

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans.人类应激相关免疫能力低下假说的证据。
Nat Commun. 2012 Feb 21;3:694. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1696.
2
Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating.人类配偶选择的变异:同时调查遗传力、父母影响、性印记和选择性交配。
Am Nat. 2011 May;177(5):605-16. doi: 10.1086/659629.
3
Inbreeding avoidance behaviors.避免近亲繁殖的行为。
Biol Lett. 2021 Nov;17(11):20210463. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0463. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
An exploratory, cross-cultural study on perception of putative cyclical changes in facial fertility cues.探索性跨文化研究:对面部生育力线索周期性变化感知的研究
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96454-w.
5
In humans, only attractive females fulfil their sexually imprinted preferences for eye colour.在人类中,只有有吸引力的女性才能满足她们对眼睛颜色的性印记偏好。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 7;10(1):6004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62781-7.
6
Fathers' eye colour sways daughters' choice of both long- and short-term partners.父亲的眼睛颜色影响女儿对长期和短期伴侣的选择。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 3;8(1):5574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23784-7.
7
The coevolution of sexual imprinting by males and females.雄性和雌性性印记的协同进化。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 14;6(19):7113-7125. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2409. eCollection 2016 Oct.
8
Imprinting and flexibility in human face cognition.人类面部认知中的印记与灵活性
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 29;6:33545. doi: 10.1038/srep33545.
9
The association between unequal parental treatment and the sibling relationship in Finland: The difference between full and half-siblings.芬兰父母不平等对待与兄弟姐妹关系之间的关联:全同胞与半同胞之间的差异。
Evol Psychol. 2015 Jun 24;13(2):492-510. doi: 10.1177/147470491501300211.
10
Mate-choice copying in single and coupled women: the influence of mate acceptance and mate rejection decisions of other women.单身女性和情侣关系中的女性的择偶模仿:其他女性对配偶的接受与拒绝决定的影响。
Evol Psychol. 2015 Jan 26;13(1):89-105. doi: 10.1177/147470491501300106.
Trends Ecol Evol. 1988 Sep;3(9):230-3. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90164-4.
4
Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.面部特征相似性介导配偶选择:对异性父母的性印记。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 7;276(1654):91-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1021.
5
Sexual imprinting on continuous variation: do female zebra finches prefer or avoid unfamiliar sons of their foster parents?对连续变异的性印记:雌性斑胸草雀会偏爱还是避开其养父母的陌生子代?
J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1274-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01568.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
6
Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: competing strategies.配偶选择印记的进化:竞争策略
Evolution. 2008 Aug;62(8):1991-2003. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00419.x. Epub 2008 May 13.
7
Sexual imprinting can induce sexual preferences for exaggerated parental traits.性印记可以诱导对夸张的亲本特征产生性偏好。
Curr Biol. 2006 Jun 6;16(11):1128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.068.
8
Sexual imprinting in human mate choice.人类配偶选择中的性印记
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 7;271(1544):1129-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2672.
9
Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.面部吸引力判断反映了对父母年龄特征的学习。
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):873-80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1971.
10
Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review.条件作用与性行为:综述
Horm Behav. 2001 Sep;40(2):291-321. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1686.