George R. Harrison Spectroscopy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, USA.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Jul;400(9):2871-80. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5004-5. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
Although several in vivo blood glucose measurement studies have been performed by different research groups using near-infrared (NIR) absorption and Raman spectroscopic techniques, prospective prediction has proven to be a challenging problem. An important issue in this case is the demonstration of causality of glucose concentration to the spectral information, especially as the intrinsic glucose signal is smaller compared with that of the other analytes in the blood-tissue matrix. Furthermore, time-dependent physiological processes make the relation between glucose concentration and spectral data more complex. In this article, chance correlations in Raman spectroscopy-based calibration model for glucose measurements are investigated for both in vitro (physical tissue models) and in vivo (animal model and human subject) cases. Different spurious glucose concentration profiles are assigned to the Raman spectra acquired from physical tissue models, where the glucose concentration is intentionally held constant. Analogous concentration profiles, in addition to the true concentration profile, are also assigned to the datasets acquired from an animal model during a glucose clamping study as well as a human subject during an oral glucose tolerance test. We demonstrate that the spurious concentration profile-based calibration models are unable to provide prospective predictions, in contrast to those based on actual concentration profiles, especially for the physical tissue models. We also show that chance correlations incorporated by the calibration models are significantly less in Raman as compared to NIR absorption spectroscopy, even for the in vivo studies. Finally, our results suggest that the incorporation of chance correlations for in vivo cases can be largely attributed to the uncontrolled physiological sources of variations. Such uncontrolled physiological variations could either be intrinsic to the subject or stem from changes in the measurement conditions.
尽管不同的研究小组已经使用近红外(NIR)吸收和拉曼光谱技术进行了多项体内血糖测量研究,但前瞻性预测已被证明是一个具有挑战性的问题。在这种情况下,一个重要的问题是证明葡萄糖浓度与光谱信息之间的因果关系,特别是因为与血液组织基质中的其他分析物相比,内在的葡萄糖信号较小。此外,时间相关的生理过程使葡萄糖浓度与光谱数据之间的关系更加复杂。本文研究了基于拉曼光谱的葡萄糖测量校准模型中的机会相关性,包括体外(物理组织模型)和体内(动物模型和人体)情况。不同的虚假葡萄糖浓度分布被分配给从物理组织模型获得的拉曼光谱,其中葡萄糖浓度被故意保持恒定。类似的浓度分布,除了真实的浓度分布外,还被分配给在葡萄糖钳夹研究中从动物模型以及在口服葡萄糖耐量测试中从人体获得的数据集。我们证明,基于虚假浓度分布的校准模型无法提供前瞻性预测,与基于实际浓度分布的模型相反,尤其是对于物理组织模型。我们还表明,即使对于体内研究,拉曼中的机会相关性也明显少于近红外吸收光谱。最后,我们的结果表明,体内情况中机会相关性的纳入在很大程度上可以归因于不受控制的生理变化源。这种不受控制的生理变化可能是受试者内在的,也可能是测量条件变化引起的。