Suppr超能文献

预防性抗帕金森病药物是否必要?丙环定撤药的对照研究。

Are prophylactic antiparkinson drugs necessary? A controlled study of procyclidine withdrawal.

作者信息

Rifkin A, Quitkin F, Kane J, Struve F, Klein D F

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Apr;35(4):483-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280093010.

Abstract

Of 55 aftercare patients receiving long-term treatment with antipsychotic and antiparkinson (AP) drugs, 37 were switched to being given placebo, and 18 remained on a regimen of procyclidine hydrochloride. The dose of antipsychotic was kept constant. After three weeks extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) developed in 54% of those patients receiving placebo and in none of those receiving procyclidine (P less than .002): Twenty-seven percent of the placebo group had EPS without akinesia, and in the same percentage akinesia developed (P = .003). We believe the risk-benefit ratio favors the routine use of AP drugs for prophylaxis and maintenance so as to avoid misdiagnosing as psychopathology, unspontaneity due to akinesia, and to reduce unreliable pill-taking due to EPS.

摘要

在55名接受抗精神病药物和抗帕金森病(AP)药物长期治疗的后续护理患者中,37名患者改用安慰剂,18名患者继续服用盐酸丙环定。抗精神病药物的剂量保持不变。三周后,接受安慰剂的患者中有54%出现锥体外系副作用(EPS),而接受丙环定的患者中无一出现(P<0.002):安慰剂组中27%的患者出现无运动不能的EPS,相同比例的患者出现运动不能(P = 0.003)。我们认为,风险效益比有利于常规使用AP药物进行预防和维持治疗,以避免误诊为精神病理学、因运动不能导致的不自主以及减少因EPS导致的服药不可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验