Department of Sexuality Studies, Center for Research on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San francisco, CA 94103, USA.
J Sex Res. 2012;49(1):36-49. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.565427. Epub 2011 May 24.
Theory and research agree that connectedness to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community is an important construct to account for in understanding issues related to health and well-being among gay and bisexual men. However, the measurement of this construct among lesbian and bisexual women or racial and ethnic minority individuals has not yet been adequately investigated. This study examined the reliability and validity of an existing measure of connectedness to the LGBT Community among a diverse group of sexual minority individuals in New York City, and whether differences in connectedness existed across gender and race or ethnicity. Scores on the measure demonstrated both internal consistency and construct stability across subgroups defined by gender and race or ethnicity. The subgroups did not differ in their mean levels of connectedness, and scores on the measure demonstrated factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity, both generally and within each of the subgroups. Inconsistencies were observed with regard to which scores on the measure demonstrated predictive validity in their associations with indicators of mental health and well-being. The scale is a useful tool for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding the role of community connectedness in the lives of diverse populations of sexual minority individuals.
理论和研究都认为,与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGBT)群体的联系是理解男同性恋和双性恋男性健康和幸福相关问题的一个重要结构。然而,在女同性恋和双性恋女性或少数族裔个人中,这一结构的衡量尚未得到充分研究。本研究在纽约市的一群不同性少数群体个体中,检验了 LGBT 社区联系现有衡量标准的可靠性和有效性,以及联系程度在性别和种族或民族之间是否存在差异。该衡量标准的得分在性别和种族或民族定义的子组中均表现出内部一致性和结构稳定性。子组之间的联系程度平均值没有差异,并且该衡量标准的得分在一般情况下以及在每个子组中均表现出因子、收敛和区分效度。在该衡量标准的哪些得分与心理健康和幸福感的指标相关联方面,观察到了不一致之处。该量表是对不同性少数群体个体的社区联系在其生活中的作用感兴趣的研究人员和从业者的有用工具。