Chan Curtis, Bavinton Benjamin R, Wong Horas T H, Rule John, Nguyen Loc, Spencer Steven, Holt Martin
Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
AIDS Behav. 2025 May;29(5):1619-1628. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
Peer support from social networks of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) has been recognised as a critical driver of engagement with HIV prevention. Using data from an online cross-sectional survey of 1,032 GBMSM aged 18 or over in Australia, a latent class analysis was conducted to categorise participants based on social support, LGBTQ + community involvement, and social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people. Comparisons between classes were assessed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. Participants were allocated into four classes: 'Gay men focused' (n = 293, 28.4%) with high levels of support from gay men, 'High and diverse' (n = 75, 7.3%) with high support from people with a range of gender and sexual identities, 'Moderate overall' (n = 177, 17.2%) who reported some support from all sources, and 'Low overall' (n = 487, 47.2%) who had low support. Lifetime HIV testing was lower in the 'Low overall' (78.0%) and 'Moderate overall' (81.9%) classes compared to the 'Gay men focused' (96.9%) and 'High and diverse' (93.3%) groups. Among non-HIV-positive participants (n = 971), lifetime PrEP use was lower in the 'Low overall' (28.9%) than the 'Gay men focused' group (56.2%) but similar in the 'High and diverse' (59.7%) and 'Moderate overall' (37.5%) groups. Greater levels of social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people were associated with higher levels of HIV testing and PrEP use. Interventions are needed to reach GBM who are less engaged with GBMSM networks or LGBTQ + communities.
男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性行为的男性(GBMSM)社交网络中的同伴支持,已被视为参与艾滋病毒预防的关键驱动因素。利用对澳大利亚1032名18岁及以上GBMSM进行的在线横断面调查数据,进行了潜在类别分析,以根据社会支持、LGBTQ + 社区参与度以及与男同性恋和LGBTQ + 人群的社交参与度对参与者进行分类。使用多变量多项逻辑回归评估类别之间的差异。参与者被分为四类:“以男同性恋为中心”(n = 293,28.4%),得到男同性恋的高度支持;“高度且多样”(n = 75,7.3%),得到来自不同性别和性取向认同者的高度支持;“总体中等”(n = 177,17.2%),报告从所有来源都获得了一些支持;“总体较低”(n = 487,47.2%),支持度较低。与“以男同性恋为中心”(96.9%)和“高度且多样”(93.3%)组相比,“总体较低”(78.0%)和“总体中等”(81.9%)类别的终生艾滋病毒检测率较低。在非艾滋病毒阳性参与者(n = 971)中,“总体较低”组(28.9%)的终生暴露前预防用药率低于“以男同性恋为中心”组(56.2%),但在“高度且多样”(59.7%)和“总体中等”(37.5%)组中相似。与男同性恋和LGBTQ + 人群的更高水平社交参与度与更高的艾滋病毒检测率和暴露前预防用药率相关。需要采取干预措施来接触那些较少参与GBMSM网络或LGBTQ + 社区的GBM。