Suppr超能文献

接受基于证据的治疗与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者生存的关联。

Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

JAMA. 2011 Apr 27;305(16):1677-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.522.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Only limited information is available on the speed of implementation of new evidence-based and guideline-recommended treatments and its association with survival in real life health care of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the adoption of new treatments and the related chances of short- and long-term survival in consecutive patients with STEMI in a single country over a 12-year period.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admission (RIKS-HIA) records baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcome of consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to almost all hospitals in Sweden. This study includes 61,238 patients with a first-time diagnosis of STEMI between 1996 and 2007.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Estimated and crude proportions of patients treated with different medications and invasive procedures and mortality over time.

RESULTS

Of evidence-based treatments, reperfusion increased from 66% (95%, confidence interval [CI], 52%-79%) to 79% (95% CI, 69%-89%; P < .001), primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 12% (95% CI, 11%-14%) to 61% (95% CI, 45%-77%; P < .001), and revascularization from 10% (96% CI, 6%-14%) to 84% (95% CI, 73%-95%; P < .001). The use of aspirin, clopidogrel, β-blockers, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors all increased: clopidogrel from 0% to 82% (95% CI, 69%-95%; P < .001), statins from 23% (95% CI, 12%-33%) to 83% (95% CI, 75%-91%; P < .001), and ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blockers from 39% (95% CI, 26%-52%) to 69% (95% CI, 58%-70%; P < .001). The estimated in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality decreased from 12.5% (95% CI, 4.3%-20.6%) to 7.2% (95% CI, 1.7%-12.6%; P < .001); from 15.0% (95% CI, 6.2%-23.7%) to 8.6% (95% CI, 2.7%-14.5%; P < .001); and from 21.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-30.9%) to 13.3% (95% CI, 6.0%-20.4%; P < .001), respectively. After adjustment, there was still a consistent trend with lower standardized mortality over the years. The 12-year survival analyses showed that the decrease of mortality was sustained over time.

CONCLUSION

In a Swedish registry of patients with STEMI, between 1996 and 2007, there was an increase in the prevalence of evidence-based treatments. During this same time, there was a decrease in 30-day and 1-year mortality that was sustained during long-term follow-up.

摘要

背景

关于新的循证和指南推荐治疗方法的实施速度及其与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者实际医疗保健中生存的关系,只有有限的信息可用。

目的

描述在 12 年期间,在一个单一国家的连续 STEMI 患者中采用新治疗方法的情况及其与短期和长期生存的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:瑞典心脏重症监护入院登记(RIKS-HIA)记录了急性冠状动脉综合征患者的基线特征、治疗方法和结局,这些患者几乎来自瑞典所有的医院。本研究包括 1996 年至 2007 年间首次诊断为 STEMI 的 61238 例患者。

主要观察指标

随时间推移,不同药物和介入治疗的估计和粗比例以及死亡率。

结果

在循证治疗中,再灌注治疗从 66%(95%置信区间[CI],52%-79%)增加到 79%(95%CI,69%-89%;P<.001),直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗从 12%(95%CI,11%-14%)增加到 61%(95%CI,45%-77%;P<.001),血管重建从 10%(96%CI,6%-14%)增加到 84%(95%CI,73%-95%;P<.001)。阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、β受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物和血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂的使用率均有所增加:氯吡格雷从 0%增加到 82%(95%CI,69%-95%;P<.001),他汀类药物从 23%(95%CI,12%-33%)增加到 83%(95%CI,75%-91%;P<.001),ACE 抑制剂或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂从 39%(95%CI,26%-52%)增加到 69%(95%CI,58%-70%;P<.001)。估计的院内、30 天和 1 年死亡率从 12.5%(95%CI,4.3%-20.6%)降至 7.2%(95%CI,1.7%-12.6%;P<.001);从 15.0%(95%CI,6.2%-23.7%)降至 8.6%(95%CI,2.7%-14.5%;P<.001);从 21.0%(95%CI,11.0%-30.9%)降至 13.3%(95%CI,6.0%-20.4%;P<.001)。调整后,标准化死亡率仍呈逐年下降趋势。12 年生存分析显示,死亡率的下降持续存在。

结论

在瑞典 STEMI 患者注册中,1996 年至 2007 年间,采用循证治疗的比例有所增加。在此期间,30 天和 1 年死亡率下降,且在长期随访中持续下降。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验