Yang Wenxing, Sun Xuehong, Zhang Yushu, Lu Zhi, Shu Zhilong, Zhang Kui
Department of Physiology, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Department of Forensic Pathology, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03919-2.
While current clinical guidelines generally advocate for beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), conflicting findings have surfaced through large-scale observational studies and meta-analyses. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies to quantify the long-term therapeutic impact of beta-blocker across heterogeneous AMI populations.
We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2000 to 2025 that examine the link between beta-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes (last search update: March 1, 2025). We used the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker therapy on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in AMI patients. Our analysis stratified these effects by study type, ejection fraction (EF), sample size, follow-up duration, and patient characteristics including primary coronary revascularization, ST-segment elevation status, and comorbidities.
This meta-analysis incorporated 34 observational studies covering 233,303 AMI patients. Our results showed beta-blockers reduced all-cause (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82) and cardiac mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.89) in post-AMI patients, with no significant effect on MACE. In these patients, post-PCI and STEMI patients, beta-blockers lowered all-cause mortality but not MACE risk. Subgroup analysis revealed that beta-blockers decreased all-cause death in post-AMI patients with diabetes and COPD, but not in those with hypertension and AF. Stratified by EF, beta-blockers were beneficial for all-cause death (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.93), cardiac death (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.92), and MACE (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.96) in post-AMI patients with reduced EF and only decreased all-cause death in those with preserved EF.
Our meta-analysis suggests beta-blockers may offer long-term clinical benefits to AMI patients, particularly those with reduced EF. However, this is not conclusive for AMI patients with comorbidities or preserved EF.
虽然目前的临床指南普遍提倡急性心肌梗死(AMI)后使用β受体阻滞剂治疗,但大规模观察性研究和荟萃分析得出了相互矛盾的结果。我们对已发表的观察性研究进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以量化β受体阻滞剂对异质性AMI人群的长期治疗效果。
我们对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库进行了全面检索,以查找2000年至2025年发表的研究β受体阻滞剂治疗与临床结局之间联系的文章(最后一次检索更新时间:2025年3月1日)。我们使用比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)来评估β受体阻滞剂治疗对AMI患者全因死亡率、心源性死亡或主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的影响。我们的分析根据研究类型、射血分数(EF)、样本量、随访时间以及患者特征(包括初次冠状动脉血运重建、ST段抬高状态和合并症)对这些影响进行了分层。
这项荟萃分析纳入了34项观察性研究,涵盖233,303例AMI患者。我们的结果显示,β受体阻滞剂降低了AMI后患者的全因死亡率(OR = 0.73,95%CI = 0.64 - 0.82)和心源性死亡率(OR = 0.79,95%CI = 0.70 - 0.89),对MACE无显著影响。在这些患者、PCI术后患者和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,β受体阻滞剂降低了全因死亡率,但未降低MACE风险。亚组分析显示,β受体阻滞剂降低了合并糖尿病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的AMI后患者的全因死亡率,但未降低合并高血压和房颤(AF)患者的全因死亡率。按EF分层,β受体阻滞剂对EF降低的AMI后患者的全因死亡(OR = 0.75,95%CI = 0.60 - 0.93)、心源性死亡(OR = 0.72,95%CI = 0.56 - 0.92)和MACE(OR = 0.85,95%CI = 0.76 - 0.96)有益,对EF保留的患者仅降低了全因死亡率。
我们的荟萃分析表明,β受体阻滞剂可能为AMI患者,尤其是EF降低的患者带来长期临床益处。然而,对于合并症患者或EF保留的AMI患者,这一结论并不确凿。