San Diego State University, School of Social Work, College of Health and Human Services, Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Studies, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Nov 1;118(2-3):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
To identify if there are different typologies for adolescent self-reporters and recanters for alcohol, cigarette and marijuana use.
This study is a secondary data analysis and utilized four waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth child panel data. The study included adolescents aged ten and older who self-reported ever use of cigarettes (n=872), marijuana (n=854) or alcohol (n=837). Consistent responders were those who reported lifetime use of a specific substance and continued to report such use at each latter wave of data collection. Latent class analyses were utilized to investigate if there are different types of self-reporters for each substance class.
Three unique groups for each substance was identified. The first group of users, who had a late age of onset, tended to be consistent self-reporters across waves. Those who were early onset users of cigarettes and marijuana tended to recant their use while early onset alcohol users were consistent reporters. Those with moderate ages of onset had no consistent recanting patterns. The highest degree of recanting was found among the early onset marijuana users.
The results suggest that youth who begin their use at an earlier age may not be as reliable reporters as youth who initiate use at later ages. Our results suggest that the veracity of prevalence estimates for licit and illicit substances could be different depending on the age of the respondent.
确定青少年自我报告和重新报告酒精、香烟和大麻使用情况是否存在不同的类型。
本研究是一项二次数据分析,利用了全国青少年纵向调查儿童面板数据的四个波次。研究包括年龄在 10 岁及以上的青少年,他们自我报告曾经使用过香烟(n=872)、大麻(n=854)或酒精(n=837)。一致应答者是指报告终身使用特定物质并在后续数据收集的每个波次继续报告这种使用情况的人。潜在类别分析用于研究每种物质类别是否存在不同类型的自我报告者。
为每种物质确定了三个独特的群体。第一组使用者的发病年龄较晚,往往在各个波次中都是一致的自我报告者。那些香烟和大麻的早期使用者往往会否认他们的使用情况,而早期饮酒者则是一致的报告者。那些发病年龄适中的人没有一致的否认模式。最早开始使用大麻的人否认使用的程度最高。
研究结果表明,开始使用年龄较早的青少年可能不如年龄较大的青少年那样可靠地报告使用情况。我们的研究结果表明,合法和非法物质的流行率估计的真实性可能因受访者的年龄而异。