• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

部分国家的医疗记录信息披露法律与政策;一项比较研究。

Medical record information disclosure laws and policies among selected countries; a comparative study.

作者信息

Yarmohammadian Mohammad Hossein, Raeisi Ahmad Reza, Tavakoli Nahid, Nansa Leila Ghaderi

机构信息

Health Management and Economic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2010 May;15(3):140-9.

PMID:21526073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3082803/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals have responsibility for responding to legitimate demands for release of health information while protecting the confidentiality of the patient health records. There have always been challenges concerning medical records confidentiality and their disclosure and release type in medical record departments. This study investigated and compared laws and policies of disclosure of health information in Iran and selected countries and tried to identify the differences and the similarities between them.

METHODS

This is a descriptive and comparative study. The scope of study included related laws and policies of disclosure of health information in selected countries such as United States, Australia, England, Malaysia and Iran. Data were gathered from systematic internet search, library resources and communication with health information professionals. Data analysis was done using comparative tables and qualitative method.

RESULTS

Study results showed that legislative institutions of each country have ordained laws and policies concerning disclosure and release of health information and in turn hospitals developed policies and procedures based on these laws. In Iran, however, there are few laws and policies concerning disclosure of health information in the form of formal letters and bylaws. There are no specific written policies and procedures for disclosure of health information in the hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to develop legitimate and appropriate laws and policies in different levels for information utilization by hospitals, medical universities and others. Meanwhile in all of the selected countries there are ordained limitations for release of health information for protecting health information in regard to patient rights.

摘要

背景

医院有责任回应合法的健康信息公开需求,同时保护患者健康记录的保密性。在医疗记录部门,医疗记录的保密性及其披露和发布类型一直存在挑战。本研究调查并比较了伊朗和选定国家的健康信息披露法律和政策,试图找出它们之间的差异和相似之处。

方法

这是一项描述性比较研究。研究范围包括美国、澳大利亚、英国、马来西亚和伊朗等选定国家的健康信息披露相关法律和政策。数据通过系统的网络搜索、图书馆资源以及与健康信息专业人员的交流收集。数据分析采用比较表和定性方法进行。

结果

研究结果表明,每个国家的立法机构都制定了有关健康信息披露和发布的法律和政策,医院进而根据这些法律制定了政策和程序。然而,在伊朗,以正式信函和规章制度形式存在的有关健康信息披露的法律和政策很少。医院没有关于健康信息披露的具体书面政策和程序。

结论

有必要在不同层面制定合法且适当的法律和政策,以供医院、医科大学及其他机构利用信息。同时,在所有选定国家,为保护患者权利方面的健康信息,对健康信息的发布都规定了限制。

相似文献

1
Medical record information disclosure laws and policies among selected countries; a comparative study.部分国家的医疗记录信息披露法律与政策;一项比较研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2010 May;15(3):140-9.
2
Patient access to electronic health record: a comparative study on laws, policies and procedures in selected countries.患者获取电子健康记录:对部分国家法律、政策和程序的比较研究。
Med Arch. 2013;67(1):63-7. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.63-67.
3
Performance of Hospitals in Protecting the Confidentiality and Information Security of Patients in Health Information Departments.医院在保护健康信息部门患者的保密性和信息安全方面的表现。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;260:202-209.
4
A comparative study of laws and procedures pertaining to the medical records retention in selected countries.关于选定国家医疗记录保留相关法律和程序的比较研究。
Acta Inform Med. 2012 Sep;20(3):174-9. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.174-179.
5
Access and Disclosure of Personal Health Information: A Challenging Privacy Landscape in 2016-2018.个人健康信息的获取与披露:2016 - 2018年充满挑战的隐私格局
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):60-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667071. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
7
American Health Information Management Association. Position Statement. Issue: disclosure of health information.美国健康信息管理协会。立场声明。议题:健康信息披露。
J AHIMA. 1993 Dec;64(12):101-2.
8
A review of the personal health records in selected countries and Iran.对选定国家和伊朗的个人健康记录进行的审查。
J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):371-82. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9482-3. Epub 2010 May 29.
9
The effect of public disclosure laws on biomedical research.公开披露法律对生物医学研究的影响。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 May;51(3):306-10.
10
Impact of health disclosure laws on health information exchanges.健康信息披露法律对健康信息交换的影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:48-56. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Patients' Medical Information Disclosure and Sociodemographic Determinants: A Cross Sectional Study.牙科患者的医疗信息披露与社会人口学决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 9;16:3195-3206. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S392837. eCollection 2022.
2
Confidentiality challenges surrounding plasma therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case discussion in Iran.新冠疫情期间血浆疗法的保密挑战:伊朗的一个案例讨论
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Dec 21;13:27. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i27.5044. eCollection 2020.
3
The related factors of compliance to professional codes of ethics from midwives' perspective working in healthcare centers of Tehran-Iran.从伊朗德黑兰医疗中心工作的助产士角度看职业道德规范依从性的相关因素
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 May 17;30:40. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.40.14436. eCollection 2018.
4
Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study.关于使用社会空间数据以研究健康的社会决定因素的保密考量:性与生殖健康案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;166:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Performance improvement through proactive risk assessment: Using failure modes and effects analysis.通过主动风险评估改进绩效:运用失效模式与效应分析。
J Educ Health Promot. 2014 May 3;3:28. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.131891. eCollection 2014.
6
Health promoting Hospitals in Iran: How it is.伊朗的健康促进医院:现状如何。
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Jul 31;2:41. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.115840. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.用于研究目的的病历获取:各研究伦理委员会的不同看法
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):308-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020032.
2
Assessing the effects of the HIPAA privacy rule on release of patient information by healthcare facilities.评估《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则对医疗机构患者信息发布的影响。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2007 Mar 23;4:1.
3
Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records.患者、隐私与信任:患者允许研究人员查阅其病历的意愿。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):223-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.045. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
4
HIPAA privacy rule and public health. Guidance from CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则与公共卫生。美国疾病控制与预防中心及美国卫生与公众服务部提供的指南。
MMWR Suppl. 2003 May 2;52:1-17, 19-20.
5
Complying with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Privacy standards.遵守《健康保险流通与责任法案》。隐私标准。
AAOHN J. 2001 Nov;49(11):501-7.
6
From DNA to data privacy.从DNA到数据隐私。
J AHIMA. 2001 Mar;72(3):46-50.
7
The new privacy officer's game plan.新隐私专员的行动计划。
J AHIMA. 2001 Feb;72(2):33-7; quiz 39-40.
8
Medical records development in Malaysia.马来西亚的医疗记录发展
IHRIM. 1995 Feb;36(1):3-5.