Suppr超能文献

对选定国家和伊朗的个人健康记录进行的审查。

A review of the personal health records in selected countries and Iran.

机构信息

Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):371-82. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9482-3. Epub 2010 May 29.

Abstract

Personal Health Record (PHR) enables patients to access their health information and improves care quality by supporting self-care. The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of the concept of PHRs in selected countries and Iran in order to investigate the gaps between Iran and more advanced countries in terms of PHRs. The study was carried out in 2008-2009 using a descriptive-comparative method in Australia, the United States, England and Iran. Data was gathered from articles, books, journals and reputed websites in English and Persian published between 1995 and September 2009. After collecting the data, both advantages and disadvantages of each of concepts were analyzed. In the three countries considered in the present study the concepts of PHR, extracted from the literature, are that; a)patient/person be recognized as the owner of PHR; b)information be disclosed only to those authorized by the patient; c) and that PHR is created upon request and consent of the individual involved. Before PHRs can be profitably used in the health administration of a (developing) country, the necessary knowledge, infrastructures, and rules need to be developed.

摘要

个人健康记录(PHR)使患者能够访问他们的健康信息,并通过支持自我保健来提高护理质量。本研究的目的是对选定国家和伊朗的 PHR 概念进行比较分析,以便调查伊朗与更先进国家在 PHR 方面的差距。该研究于 2008-2009 年在澳大利亚、美国、英国和伊朗使用描述性比较方法进行。数据来自 1995 年至 2009 年 9 月期间以英语和波斯语发表的文章、书籍、期刊和知名网站。收集数据后,分析了每个概念的优点和缺点。在本研究中考虑的三个国家中,从文献中提取的 PHR 概念是:a)患者/人被视为 PHR 的所有者;b)信息仅披露给患者授权的人员;c)并且 PHR 是应个人请求并经其同意创建的。在(发展中)国家的卫生管理中有效地使用 PHR 之前,需要开发必要的知识、基础设施和规则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验