Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Womens Health Issues. 2011 May-Jun;21(3 Suppl):S44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.002.
Some abortion policies in the U.S. are based on the notion that abortion harms women's mental health. The American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Abortion and Mental Health concluded that first-trimester abortions do not harm women's mental health. However, the APA task force does not make conclusions regarding later abortions (second trimester or beyond) and mental health. This paper critically evaluates studies on later abortion and mental health in order to inform both policy and practice.
Using guidelines outlined by Steinberg and Russo (2009), post 1989 quantitative studies on later abortion and mental health were evaluated on the following qualities: 1) composition of comparison groups, 2) how prior mental health was assessed, and 3) whether common risk factors were controlled for in analyses if a significant relationship between abortion and mental health was found. Studies were evaluated with respect to the claim that later abortions harm women's mental health.
Eleven quantitative studies that compared the mental health of women having later abortions (for reasons of fetal anomaly) with other groups were evaluated. Findings differed depending on the comparison group. No studies considered the role of prepregnancy mental health, and one study considered whether factors common among women having later abortions and mental health problems drove the association between later abortion and mental health.
Policies based on the notion that later abortions (because of fetal anomaly) harm women's mental health are unwarranted. Because research suggests that most women who have later abortions do so for reasons other than fetal anomaly, future investigations should examine women's psychological experiences around later abortions.
美国的一些堕胎政策基于堕胎会损害女性心理健康的观点。美国心理协会(APA)堕胎与心理健康特别工作组得出结论,认为堕胎不会损害女性的心理健康。然而,该工作组并未就晚期堕胎(第二孕期及以后)和心理健康得出结论。本文批判性地评估了关于晚期堕胎与心理健康的研究,以期为政策和实践提供信息。
根据 Steinberg 和 Russo(2009)提出的指南,评估了 1989 年后关于晚期堕胎和心理健康的定量研究,主要从以下三个方面进行评估:1)对照组的构成,2)如何评估先前的心理健康状况,以及 3)如果发现堕胎与心理健康之间存在显著关系,是否对常见的风险因素进行了分析。这些研究是基于晚期堕胎会损害女性心理健康的说法进行评估的。
评估了 11 项比较因胎儿异常而进行晚期堕胎的女性心理健康状况与其他群体的定量研究。研究结果因对照组而异。没有研究考虑到孕前心理健康的作用,只有一项研究考虑了导致晚期堕胎与心理健康之间关联的常见因素,即晚期堕胎和心理健康问题是否在妇女中普遍存在。
基于晚期堕胎(因胎儿异常)会损害女性心理健康的观点制定的政策是没有根据的。由于研究表明,大多数进行晚期堕胎的女性并非因为胎儿异常,因此未来的研究应该检查女性在晚期堕胎方面的心理体验。