• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网技能性能测试:人们是否为电子健康做好准备?

Internet skills performance tests: are people ready for eHealth?

作者信息

van Deursen Alexander J A M, van Dijk Jan A G M

机构信息

University of Twente, Department of Media, Communication and Organization, Enschede, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 29;13(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.1581
PMID:21531690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3221376/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the amount of online health information, there are several barriers that limit the Internet's adoption as a source of health information. One of these barriers is highlighted in conceptualizations of the digital divide which include the differential possession of Internet skills, or "eHealth literacy". Most measures of Internet skills among populations at large use self-assessments. The research discussed here applies a multifaceted definition of Internet skills and uses actual performance tests.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess how ready a sample of the general population is for eHealth. More specifically, four types of Internet skills were measured in a performance test in which subjects had to complete health-related assignments on the Internet.

METHODS

From November 1, 2009, through February 28, 2010, 88 subjects participated in the study. Subjects were randomly selected from a telephone directory. A selective quota sample was used divided over equal subsamples of gender, age, and education. Each subject had to accomplish assignments on the Internet. The Internet skills accounted for were categorized as operational (basic skills to use the Internet), formal (navigation and orientation), information (finding information), and strategic (using the information for personal benefits). The tests took approximately 1.5 hours and were conducted in a University office, making the setting equally new for all. Successful completion and time spent on the assignments-the two main outcomes-were directly measured by the test leader.

RESULTS

The subjects successfully completed an average of 73% (5.8/8) of the operational Internet skill tasks and an average of 73% (2.9/4) of the formal Internet skill tasks. Of the information Internet skills tasks, an average of 50% (1.5/3) was completed successfully and, of the strategic Internet skills tasks, 35% (0.7/2). Only 28% (25/88) of the subjects were able to successfully complete all operational skills tasks, 39% (34/88), all formal skills tasks, 13% (11/88), all information skills tasks, and 20% (18/88), both the strategic skill tasks. The time spent on the assignments varied substantially. Age and education were the most important contributors to the operational and formal Internet skills. Regarding the formal Internet skills, years of Internet experience also had some influence. Educational level of attainment was the most important contributor to the information and strategic Internet skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the amount of online health-related information and services is consistently growing, it appears that the general population lacks the skills to keep up. Most problematic appear to be the lack of information and strategic Internet skills, which, in the context of health, are very important. The lack of these skills is also problematic for members of younger generations, who are often considered skilled Internet users. This primarily seems to account for the operational and formal Internet skills. The results of the study strongly call for policies to increase the level of Internet skills.

摘要

背景

尽管在线健康信息数量众多,但仍存在若干障碍限制了互联网作为健康信息来源的应用。数字鸿沟的概念突出了其中一个障碍,即互联网技能(或“电子健康素养”)的差异拥有情况。大多数针对普通人群互联网技能的衡量采用自我评估。此处讨论的研究采用了多方面的互联网技能定义,并使用实际操作测试。

目的

本研究的目的是评估普通人群样本对电子健康的准备程度。更具体地说,在一项操作测试中测量了四种类型的互联网技能,受试者必须在互联网上完成与健康相关的任务。

方法

从2009年11月1日至2010年2月28日,88名受试者参与了该研究。受试者从电话簿中随机选取。采用选择性配额样本,按性别、年龄和教育程度分为相等的子样本。每个受试者都必须在互联网上完成任务。所涉及的互联网技能分为操作技能(使用互联网的基本技能)、形式技能(导航和定位)、信息技能(查找信息)和策略技能(将信息用于个人利益)。测试大约需要1.5小时,在大学办公室进行,对所有人来说环境都是同样陌生的。测试负责人直接测量了任务的成功完成情况和完成任务所花费的时间这两个主要结果。

结果

受试者平均成功完成了73%(5.8/8)的操作互联网技能任务和73%(2.9/4)的形式互联网技能任务。在信息互联网技能任务中,平均50%(1.5/3)成功完成,在策略互联网技能任务中,35%(0.7/2)成功完成。只有28%(25/88)的受试者能够成功完成所有操作技能任务,39%(34/88)能完成所有形式技能任务,13%(11/88)能完成所有信息技能任务,20%(18/88)能完成策略技能任务。完成任务所花费的时间差异很大。年龄和教育程度是操作和形式互联网技能的最重要影响因素。关于形式互联网技能,互联网使用年限也有一定影响。受教育程度是信息和策略互联网技能的最重要影响因素。

结论

尽管与健康相关的在线信息和服务数量一直在增长,但普通人群似乎缺乏跟上的技能。最成问题的似乎是缺乏信息和策略互联网技能,而在健康背景下,这些技能非常重要。这些技能的缺乏对年轻一代成员来说也存在问题,他们通常被认为是熟练的互联网用户。这主要似乎体现在操作和形式互联网技能方面。研究结果强烈呼吁制定政策提高互联网技能水平。

相似文献

1
Internet skills performance tests: are people ready for eHealth?互联网技能性能测试:人们是否为电子健康做好准备?
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 29;13(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581.
2
Internet skill-related problems in accessing online health information.上网获取健康信息的互联网技能相关问题。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jan;81(1):61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
3
Internet-of-Things Skills Among the General Population: Task-Based Performance Test Using Activity Trackers.普通人群中的物联网技能:使用活动追踪器的基于任务的性能测试。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Nov 18;7(4):e22532. doi: 10.2196/22532.
4
Development of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument: Measuring a Broad Spectrum of Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 Skills.数字健康素养工具的开发:衡量广泛的健康1.0和健康2.0技能
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 24;19(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6709.
5
The Role of Age, Education, and Digital Health Literacy in the Usability of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: Mixed Methods Study.年龄、教育程度和数字健康素养在基于互联网的慢性疼痛认知行为疗法可用性中的作用:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Nov 21;3(4):e12883. doi: 10.2196/12883.
6
Assessing Electronic Health Literacy in the State of Kuwait: Survey of Internet Users From an Arab State.科威特国电子健康素养评估:对一个阿拉伯国家互联网用户的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 24;21(5):e11174. doi: 10.2196/11174.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Measuring actual eHealth literacy among patients with rheumatic diseases: a qualitative analysis of problems encountered using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 applications.测量风湿性疾病患者的实际电子健康素养:对使用健康1.0和健康2.0应用程序时遇到的问题进行定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 11;15(2):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2428.
9
A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers.一个用于描述电子健康素养需求和障碍的框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 17;13(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1750.
10
eHealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education.大学生的电子健康素养:一项对电子健康教育有启示的系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 1;13(4):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1703.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and effectiveness evaluation of an interactive e-learning environment to enhance digital health literacy in cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开发并评估用于提高癌症患者数字健康素养的交互式电子学习环境的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 24;7:1455143. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1455143. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital health literacy and sociodemographic factors among students in western Iran: a cross-sectional study.伊朗西部学生的数字健康素养与社会人口学因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06774-y.
3
Internet-delivered emotional self-management program for the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: Usability testing.

本文引用的文献

1
Health information seeking behavior.健康信息寻求行为。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(8):1006-19. doi: 10.1177/1049732307305199.
2
Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS).美国利用互联网与医疗服务提供者进行沟通的情况:来自2003年和2005年健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的估计数据。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jul 12;9(3):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20.
3
eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.
COVID-19大流行期间面向普通人群的互联网情感自我管理项目:可用性测试
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 11;10:20552076241258419. doi: 10.1177/20552076241258419. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Digital Health Technology Use Across Socioeconomic Groups Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Panel Study.新冠大流行前后不同社会经济群体对数字健康技术的使用:面板研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 13;10:e55384. doi: 10.2196/55384.
5
Structural Validation and Measurement Invariance Testing of the Chinese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Undergraduates: Cross-Sectional Study.大学生电子健康素养量表中文版的结构验证和测量不变性测试:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e48838. doi: 10.2196/48838.
6
Performance-Based Measurement of eHealth Literacy: Systematic Scoping Review.基于绩效的电子健康素养测量:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e44602. doi: 10.2196/44602.
7
eHealth Literacy and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Resource-Limited Settings: Cross-sectional Study.资源有限环境下新冠疫情期间卫生专业人员的电子健康素养及其相关因素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 13;6(7):e36206. doi: 10.2196/36206.
8
Validation of the COVID-19 Digital Health Literacy Instrument in the Italian Language: A Cross-Sectional Study of Italian University Students.验证 COVID-19 数字健康素养工具在意大利语中的有效性:对意大利大学生的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106247.
9
Effects of a Novel Blood Glucose Forecasting Feature on Glycemic Management and Logging in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using One Drop: Retrospective Cohort Study.一项关于新型血糖预测功能对使用一滴血糖仪的2型糖尿病成人患者血糖管理及记录影响的回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 May 3;7(2):e34624. doi: 10.2196/34624.
10
Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey.参与一项基于互联网指导的认知行为疗法(CBT)干预父母的单臂可行性试验(ENGAGE)的退出率和不参与原因:一项嵌套的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e056758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758.
电子健康素养:网络世界中消费者健康的必备技能。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
4
Health information literacy and competencies of information age students: results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA).信息时代学生的健康信息素养与能力:交互式在线研究准备自我评估(RRSA)的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Apr 21;8(2):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e6.
5
Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature.为何通过互联网提供医疗保健干预措施?对已发表文献的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 23;8(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10.
6
Information preferences and practices among people living with HIV/AIDS: results from a nationwide survey.艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者的信息偏好与行为:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Oct;93(4):431-9.
7
Shortcomings of health information on the Internet.互联网上健康信息的缺点。
Health Promot Int. 2003 Dec;18(4):381-6. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dag409.
8
An assessment of the quality and usability of smoking cessation information on the Internet.互联网上戒烟信息的质量与可用性评估。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Jul;4(3):278-87. doi: 10.1177/1524839903004003012.
9
Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者随时间推移进行的信息收集。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e15. Epub 2003 Aug 27.
10
Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.评估万维网上面向消费者的健康信息质量的实证研究:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.