• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个用于描述电子健康素养需求和障碍的框架。

A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers.

作者信息

Chan Connie V, Kaufman David R

机构信息

Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 17;13(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1750.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.1750
PMID:22094891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3222196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consumer eHealth interventions are of a growing importance in the individual management of health and health behaviors. However, a range of access, resources, and skills barriers prevent health care consumers from fully engaging in and benefiting from the spectrum of eHealth interventions. Consumers may engage in a range of eHealth tasks, such as participating in health discussion forums and entering information into a personal health record. eHealth literacy names a set of skills and knowledge that are essential for productive interactions with technology-based health tools, such as proficiency in information retrieval strategies, and communicating health concepts effectively.

OBJECTIVE

We propose a theoretical and methodological framework for characterizing complexity of eHealth tasks, which can be used to diagnose and describe literacy barriers and inform the development of solution strategies.

METHODS

We adapted and integrated two existing theoretical models relevant to the analysis of eHealth literacy into a single framework to systematically categorize and describe task demands and user performance on tasks needed by health care consumers in the information age. The method derived from the framework is applied to (1) code task demands using a cognitive task analysis, and (2) code user performance on tasks. The framework and method are applied to the analysis of a Web-based consumer eHealth task with information-seeking and decision-making demands. We present the results from the in-depth analysis of the task performance of a single user as well as of 20 users on the same task to illustrate both the detailed analysis and the aggregate measures obtained and potential analyses that can be performed using this method.

RESULTS

The analysis shows that the framework can be used to classify task demands as well as the barriers encountered in user performance of the tasks. Our approach can be used to (1) characterize the challenges confronted by participants in performing the tasks, (2) determine the extent to which application of the framework to the cognitive task analysis can predict and explain the problems encountered by participants, and (3) inform revisions to the framework to increase accuracy of predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this illustrative application suggest that the framework is useful for characterizing task complexity and for diagnosing and explaining barriers encountered in task completion. The framework and analytic approach can be a potentially powerful generative research platform to inform development of rigorous eHealth examination and design instruments, such as to assess eHealth competence, to design and evaluate consumer eHealth tools, and to develop an eHealth curriculum.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/e480dafbe7d7/jmir_v13i4e94_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/49bab91be13f/jmir_v13i4e94_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/7a41ce2dee7b/jmir_v13i4e94_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/23cf8b2edc49/jmir_v13i4e94_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/505661618ae2/jmir_v13i4e94_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/e480dafbe7d7/jmir_v13i4e94_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/49bab91be13f/jmir_v13i4e94_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/7a41ce2dee7b/jmir_v13i4e94_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/23cf8b2edc49/jmir_v13i4e94_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/505661618ae2/jmir_v13i4e94_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/3222196/e480dafbe7d7/jmir_v13i4e94_fig5.jpg

背景

消费者电子健康干预在个人健康及健康行为管理中日益重要。然而,一系列获取途径、资源和技能障碍阻碍了医疗保健消费者充分参与电子健康干预并从中受益。消费者可能会参与一系列电子健康任务,例如参加健康讨论论坛以及将信息录入个人健康记录。电子健康素养指的是与基于技术的健康工具进行有效互动所必需的一系列技能和知识,比如信息检索策略的熟练程度以及有效传达健康概念的能力。

目的

我们提出一个用于描述电子健康任务复杂性的理论和方法框架,该框架可用于诊断和描述素养障碍,并为解决方案策略的制定提供依据。

方法

我们对与电子健康素养分析相关的两个现有理论模型进行了改编和整合,形成一个单一框架,以系统地分类和描述信息时代医疗保健消费者所需任务的任务要求和用户表现。从该框架衍生出的方法应用于:(1)使用认知任务分析对任务要求进行编码,(2)对任务的用户表现进行编码。该框架和方法应用于对一项具有信息搜索和决策要求的基于网络的消费者电子健康任务的分析。我们展示了对单个用户以及20名用户在同一任务上的任务表现进行深入分析的结果,以说明详细分析以及所获得的汇总测量结果,以及使用此方法可进行的潜在分析。

结果

分析表明,该框架可用于对任务要求以及任务用户表现中遇到的障碍进行分类。我们的方法可用于:(1)描述参与者在执行任务时面临的挑战,(2)确定将该框架应用于认知任务分析能够预测和解释参与者遇到的问题的程度,(3)为框架的修订提供依据以提高预测的准确性。

结论

这个示例应用的结果表明,该框架对于描述任务复杂性以及诊断和解释任务完成过程中遇到的障碍很有用。该框架和分析方法可能是一个强大的生成性研究平台,可为严格的电子健康检查和设计工具的开发提供依据,例如评估电子健康能力、设计和评估消费者电子健康工具以及开发电子健康课程。

相似文献

1
A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers.一个用于描述电子健康素养需求和障碍的框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 17;13(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1750.
2
A taxonomy characterizing complexity of consumer eHealth Literacy.一种描述消费者电子健康素养复杂性的分类法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:86-90.
3
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs.通过电子健康素养提高以消费者为中心的健康信息技术系统的有效性:理解用户需求的框架
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 May 20;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.3696.
4
Identifying Health Consumers' eHealth Literacy to Decrease Disparities in Accessing eHealth Information.识别健康消费者的电子健康素养以减少获取电子健康信息方面的差距。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Feb;34(2):71-6; quiz 99. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000205.
5
Measuring actual eHealth literacy among patients with rheumatic diseases: a qualitative analysis of problems encountered using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 applications.测量风湿性疾病患者的实际电子健康素养:对使用健康1.0和健康2.0应用程序时遇到的问题进行定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 11;15(2):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2428.
6
Effects of an eHealth literacy intervention for older adults.针对老年人的电子健康素养干预措施的效果
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 3;13(4):e90. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1880.
7
Relationships Between eHealth Literacy and Health Behaviors in Korean Adults.韩国成年人的电子健康素养与健康行为之间的关系
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Feb;35(2):84-90. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000255.
8
Performance-Based Measurement of eHealth Literacy: Systematic Scoping Review.基于绩效的电子健康素养测量:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e44602. doi: 10.2196/44602.
9
The Consumer Health Information System Adoption Model.消费者健康信息系统采用模型。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;218:26-31.
10
Self-reported eHealth literacy skills among nursing students in Sri Lanka: A cross-sectional study.斯里兰卡护理专业学生自我报告的电子健康素养技能:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review.电子健康素养评估工具:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 20;27:e66965. doi: 10.2196/66965.
3
Digital health literacy-a key factor in realizing the value of digital transformation in healthcare.数字健康素养——实现医疗保健领域数字转型价值的关键因素。

本文引用的文献

1
A taxonomy characterizing complexity of consumer eHealth Literacy.一种描述消费者电子健康素养复杂性的分类法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:86-90.
2
Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population.低收入老年人群使用电子个人健康记录面临的挑战。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Oct 27;11(4):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1256.
3
The challenge of shared decision making among patients with lower literacy: a framework for research and development.低文化程度患者共同决策面临的挑战:研究与开发的框架。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 5;7:1461342. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1461342. eCollection 2025.
4
Health Care and Health Information Access by Parents With Young Children in Regional Queensland.昆士兰地区有幼儿的父母的医疗保健与健康信息获取情况
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;33(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70060.
5
Barriers and limitations to the development of a telemental health service for workers in Peru- A user-centered approach.秘鲁劳动者远程心理健康服务发展的障碍与局限——一种以用户为中心的方法
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0321401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321401. eCollection 2025.
6
Social Media and eHealth Literacy Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review.老年人的社交媒体与电子健康素养:系统文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 26;27:e66058. doi: 10.2196/66058.
7
Investigating the electronic health literacy promotion strategies in adolescent girls: A cross-sectional study in Iran.调查青春期女孩的电子健康素养提升策略:伊朗的一项横断面研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jan 31;14:27. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1980_23. eCollection 2025.
8
[Recruitment strategies for reaching adults aged fifty years and older with low socioeconomic status for participation in online physical activity interventions].针对社会经济地位较低的50岁及以上成年人参与在线体育活动干预的招募策略
TSG. 2025;103(Suppl 1):26-34. doi: 10.1007/s12508-025-00450-8. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
9
Effectiveness of eHealth literacy interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies.电子健康素养干预措施的有效性:对实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21354-x.
10
How does mHealth benefit older Chinese adults' quality of life? Examining the roles of eHealth literacy, health motivation, and patient activation.移动健康如何有益于中国老年人的生活质量?审视电子健康素养、健康动机和患者激活的作用。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 13;11:20552076241313160. doi: 10.1177/20552076241313160. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):35-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09342279. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
4
Usability testing finds problems for novice users of pediatric portals.可用性测试发现儿科门户新手用户的问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):660-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3154. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
5
Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved.老年人、慢性病患者及服务不足人群使用健康信息技术的障碍与驱动因素。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008 Nov(175):1-1422.
6
Evaluating a case study using Bloom's Taxonomy of Education.运用布鲁姆教育目标分类法评估一个案例研究。
AORN J. 2008 Sep;88(3):390-402. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.04.020.
7
Exploring social contextual correlates of computer ownership and frequency of use among urban, low-income, public housing adult residents.探索城市低收入公共住房成年居民中计算机拥有情况和使用频率的社会环境相关因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Dec 13;9(4):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.4.e35.
8
Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group.以患者为中心的应用:利用信息技术促进疾病管理与健康。美国医学信息学会知识流动工作组白皮书。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):8-13. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2492. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
9
Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.重新思考健康数字素养:一项多学科文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):713-21. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2464. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
Health disparities, communication inequalities, and eHealth.健康差异、沟通不平等与电子健康。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S131-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.012.