Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭的疼痛评估

Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: evaluation of pain.

作者信息

Atabekoğlu C S, Türkçüoğlu I, Duru B, Sönmezer M, Süer G, Uysalel A, Koç A, Söylemez F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, University School of Medicine, Turkey.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 May;31(4):307-10. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2011.560302.

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of closure or non-closure of parietal and visceral peritoneum during caesarean section (CS) on post-caesarean pain and analgesic requirement. A total of 94 primigravidas planned for elective CS were prospectively enrolled into closure (n = 46) and non-closure (n = 48) groups. Analgesia was provided by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). Total dose of analgesics administered through PCA and times of analgesia demand and additional analgesics were also assessed. VAS and VRS scores were similar between the groups. The total dose of analgesics administered were similar (p = 0.095) between groups, however the mean number of analgesic demand (p = 0.020) and the additional analgesics (p < 0.001) were higher in the closure group. As a conclusion, the closure or non-closure of the peritoneum does not have any impact on postoperative pain intensity, however the analgesia demand and additional analgesia requirement decreases with non-closure.

摘要

我们评估了剖宫产术中关闭或不关闭壁层和脏层腹膜对剖宫产术后疼痛及镇痛需求的影响。共有94例计划行择期剖宫产的初产妇被前瞻性纳入关闭腹膜组(n = 46)和不关闭腹膜组(n = 48)。术后通过患者自控镇痛泵(PCA)进行镇痛。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和语言评定量表(VRS)评估疼痛。还评估了通过PCA给予的镇痛药总剂量、镇痛需求次数及额外使用的镇痛药。两组间VAS和VRS评分相似。两组间给予的镇痛药总剂量相似(p = 0.095),然而,关闭腹膜组的平均镇痛需求次数(p = 0.020)和额外使用的镇痛药(p < 0.001)更多。结论是,腹膜的关闭或不关闭对术后疼痛强度没有任何影响,然而,不关闭腹膜时镇痛需求和额外镇痛需求会减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验