Lercher Peter, Botteldooren Dick, Widmann Ulrich, Uhrner Ulrich, Kammeringer Ewald
Department of Hygiene, Microbiology, and Social Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck Med Univ Innsbruck, Sonnenburgstraβe 16, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Noise Health. 2011 May-Jun;13(52):234-50. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.80160.
Cardiovascular effects of noise rank second in terms of disability-adjusted life year (DALYs) after annoyance. Although research during the past decade has consolidated the available data base, the most recent meta-analysis still shows wide confidence intervals - indicating imprecise information for public health risk assessment. The alpine area of Tyrol in the Austrian part of the Alps has experienced a massive increase in car and heavy goods traffic (road and rail) during the last 35 years. Over the past 25 years small-, middle-, and large-sized epidemiological health surveys have been conducted - mostly within the framework of environmental health impact assessments. By design, these studies have emphasized a contextually driven environmental stress perspective, where the adverse health effects on account of noise are studied in a broader framework of environmental health, susceptibility, and coping. Furthermore, innovative exposure assessment strategies have been implemented. This article reviews the existing knowledge from these studies over time, and presents the exposure-response curves, with and without interaction assessment, based on standardized re-analyses and discusses it in the light of past and current cardiovascular noise effects research. The findings support relevant moderation by age, gender, and family history in nearly all studies and suggest a strong need for consideration of non-linearity in the exposure-response analyses. On the other hand, air pollution has not played a relevant role as a moderator in the noise-hypertension or the noise-angina pectoris relationship. Finally, different noise modeling procedures can introduce variations in the exposure response curves, with substantive consequences for public health risk assessment of noise exposure.
就伤残调整生命年(DALYs)而言,噪声对心血管系统的影响仅次于烦恼。尽管过去十年的研究巩固了现有数据库,但最新的荟萃分析仍显示出较宽的置信区间,这表明在公共卫生风险评估方面信息不够精确。奥地利阿尔卑斯山地区的蒂罗尔州山区在过去35年中,汽车和重型货物运输(公路和铁路)量大幅增加。在过去25年里,开展了小型、中型和大型的流行病学健康调查,大部分是在环境卫生影响评估框架内进行的。从设计上看,这些研究强调了由环境驱动的环境应激视角,即在更广泛的环境卫生、易感性和应对框架内研究噪声对健康的不利影响。此外,还实施了创新的暴露评估策略。本文回顾了这些研究随时间积累的现有知识,并基于标准化重新分析呈现了有无交互作用评估的暴露-反应曲线,并结合过去和当前的心血管噪声影响研究进行讨论。几乎所有研究的结果都支持年龄、性别和家族史的相关调节作用,并表明在暴露-反应分析中强烈需要考虑非线性。另一方面,空气污染在噪声与高血压或噪声与心绞痛的关系中并未起到相关调节作用。最后,不同的噪声建模程序可能会导致暴露反应曲线出现差异,这对噪声暴露的公共卫生风险评估具有实质性影响。