Elmenhorst Eva-Maria, Quehl Julia, Müller Uwe, Basner Mathias
DLR-German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51170 Cologne, Germany.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):213-22. doi: 10.1121/1.4842475.
Various studies indicate that at the same noise level and during the daytime, annoyance increases in the order of rail, road, and aircraft noise. The present study investigates if the same ranking can be found for annoyance to nocturnal exposure and next day cognitive performance. Annoyance ratings and performance change during combined noise exposure were also tested. In the laboratory 72 participants were exposed to air, road, or rail traffic noise and all combinations. The number of noise events and LAS,eq were kept constant. Each morning noise annoyance questionnaires and performance tasks were administered. Aircraft noise annoyance ranked first followed by railway and road noise. A possible explanation is the longer duration of aircraft noise events used in this study compared to road and railway noise events. In contrast to road and rail traffic, aircraft noise annoyance was higher after nights with combined exposure. Pooled noise exposure data showed small but significant impairments in reaction times (6 ms) compared to nights without noise. The noise sources did not have a differential impact on performance. Combined exposure to multiple traffic noise sources did not induce stronger impairments than a single noise source. This was reflected also in low workload ratings.
多项研究表明,在相同噪音水平且白天期间,烦恼程度按照铁路、道路和飞机噪音的顺序递增。本研究调查了在夜间暴露以及次日认知表现方面,是否也能发现相同的烦恼程度排序。同时还测试了在组合噪音暴露期间的烦恼评级和表现变化。在实验室中,72名参与者暴露于空气、道路或铁路交通噪音以及所有组合的噪音环境中。噪音事件的数量和等效连续A声级(LAS,eq)保持不变。每天早晨都会进行噪音烦恼问卷调查和表现任务测试。飞机噪音引起的烦恼程度排名第一,其次是铁路和道路噪音。一个可能的解释是,与道路和铁路噪音事件相比,本研究中使用的飞机噪音事件持续时间更长。与道路和铁路交通不同的是,在经历了组合暴露的夜晚之后,飞机噪音引起的烦恼程度更高。汇总的噪音暴露数据显示,与无噪音的夜晚相比,反应时间有微小但显著的损害(6毫秒)。噪音源对表现没有差异影响。与单一噪音源相比,多种交通噪音源的组合暴露并没有导致更强的损害。这也体现在较低的工作量评级上。