Suppr超能文献

围孕期窗口期间回顾性报告行为的有效性。

Validity of retrospectively reported behaviors during the periconception window.

作者信息

Gollenberg Audra L, Mumford Sunni L, Cooney Maureen A, Sundaram Rajeshwari, Louis Germaine M Buck

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland. USA.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(3-4):130-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of retrospectively reported maternal behaviors while attempting pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Participants in a prospective pregnancy cohort study with periconception enrollment were queried about use of cigarettes, alcohol, vitamins and caffeine and the consumption of sport fish while attempting pregnancy. Prospective longitudinal data reported in daily diaries (gold standard) were compared with data obtained a decade later using a self-administered questionnaire. Agreement was assessed by percent agreement and Kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

Among the 82 participating women, percent agreement ranged from 54-74% for the 5 behaviors. Validity was highest for smoking (Kappa = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22, 0.65) followed by fish consumption (Kappa = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.55), caffeine (Kappa = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.51) and alcohol (Kappa = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.33). There were no systematic differences in agreement by time to pregnancy or pregnancy outcome. Associations between smoking and alcohol consumption and pregnancy outcomes were highly sensitive to the levels of misclassification observed in this study.

CONCLUSION

Validity was poor to moderate for the 5 behaviors, though higher for more regular behaviors such as smoking and caffeine consumption. The potential for misreporting of periconception behaviors can affect inferences, and thus efforts to capture information prospectively should be promoted.

摘要

目的

评估回顾性报告的备孕期间母亲行为的有效性。

研究设计

对纳入围孕期的前瞻性妊娠队列研究的参与者,询问其在备孕期间香烟、酒精、维生素和咖啡因的使用情况以及食用海鱼的情况。将每日日记中报告的前瞻性纵向数据(金标准)与十年后通过自行填写问卷获得的数据进行比较。通过百分比一致性和卡帕系数评估一致性。

结果

在82名参与研究的女性中,这5种行为的百分比一致性在54%-74%之间。吸烟的有效性最高(卡帕=0.43,95%置信区间[CI]:0.22,0.65),其次是食用海鱼(卡帕=0.32,95%CI:0.09,0.55)、咖啡因(卡帕=0.21,95%CI:0.09,0.51)和酒精(卡帕=0.20,95%CI:0.08,0.33)。按怀孕时间或妊娠结局划分,一致性无系统性差异。吸烟和饮酒与妊娠结局之间的关联对本研究中观察到的错误分类水平高度敏感。

结论

这5种行为的有效性为差到中等,不过对于吸烟和咖啡因摄入等更规律的行为有效性更高。围孕期行为误报的可能性会影响推断,因此应提倡前瞻性收集信息的工作。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Fetal origins of perinatal morbidity and/or adult disease.围产期发病率和/或成人疾病的胎儿起源。
Semin Reprod Med. 2008 Sep;26(5):436-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1087109. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
8
Periconception window: advising the pregnancy-planning couple.受孕窗口期:为计划怀孕的夫妇提供建议。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Feb;89(2 Suppl):e119-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.043.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验